Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Anti-Adhesion Product in the Prevention of Intraperitoneal Adhesions

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Adhesion Product in the Prevention of Intraperitoneal Adhesions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00512356
Enrollment
46
Registered
2007-08-07
Start date
2000-12-31
Completion date
2003-04-30
Last updated
2017-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraperitoneal Adhesions

Brief summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Anti-Adhesion Product (AAP) in preventing or reducing post-operative adhesion formation and re-formation in a subject population having abdominal surgery and being left with a rectal stump and a temporary stoma from a first procedure and scheduled for a laparoscopy/ laparotomy as a second procedure in the normal treatment of the subjects' disease. In both study groups, surgical measures to prevent adhesions were taken, e.g. using minimum traumatizing surgical technique, using powder-free gloves. In the investigational product group, AAP was applied to the rectal stump and the incision line while no specific additional treatment was applied in the control group. The surgeon assessed preexisting adhesions during the first surgery. Newly developed and re-formed adhesions were evaluated during the second surgery by a surgeon or assistant who did not know the result of randomization. The safety of the study drug was also monitored.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAnti-Adhesion Product

Anti-Adhesion Product (AAP) is a biological two-component product of human origin. The components of AAP are lyophilized Anti-Adhesion Protein Concentrate (AAPC), containing fibrinogen, lyophilized Thrombin Concentrate (TC) and the respective diluents for the reconstitution of the components.

Sponsors

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent obtained from the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative prior to study entry * Male or female subjects \> 18 years of age * Subjects undergoing abdominal surgery with the possibility that a rectal stump would remain due to one or more of the following reasons: inflammatory bowel diseases, neoplasm, colon diverticulitis, colonic obstruction, colon polyposis, peritoneal trauma, fistula, incontinence, or other reasons * Subjects for whom a second abdominal surgery is planned within approximately eight months of the first surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Pre operative: * Pregnancy and lactation period * Subjects concurrently participating in another clinical trial with a drug or a device * Subjects who have participated in a clinical trial with a drug or a device within 30 days prior to this study * Subjects who have had abdominal/pelvic surgery within six months prior to this study * Subjects who have received or will receive (approximately within the next eight months) abdominal/pelvic irradiation Intra operative: * Subjects with peritonitis * Subjects with gastrointestinal metastatic cancer, or cancer growing per continuitatem into surrounding tissues * Subjects treated with hemostatic agents (e.g. fibrin sealant, collagen, oxidized cellulose) during the first surgery * Subjects treated with adhesion prevention agents other than the Anti-Adhesion Product (AAP) (e.g. Intergel® Adhesion Prevention Solution, Seprafilm® Membrane) during the first surgery * Subjects with major fecal contamination needing an abdominal lavage during the first surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of adhesions around the rectal stump and/or incision line

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Extent and severity of adhesions around the rectal stump
Extent and severity of adhesions at the incision line
Number of subjects with no adhesions
Time to reach and free the rectal stump
Safety (laboratory evaluation, recording of adverse experiences)
Incidence, extent and severity of adhesions at sites other than the rectal stump and incision line

Countries

Denmark, Poland, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026