Skip to content

Prevalence and Treatment of Anemia in Rehabilitation Patients

Prevalence and Treatment of Anemia in Patients Admitted to Subacute Rehabilitation Hospital

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00511901
Enrollment
22
Registered
2007-08-06
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2014-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Keywords

anemia, function, rehabilitation

Brief summary

Patients who are admitted to subacute rehabilitation facilities following hospitalization are frequently anemic. The purpose of this study is to see if anemic patients treated with epoetin alfa will have higher hemoglobin levels and better functional recovery at 3, 8, and 12 weeks after study entry compared to patients who do not receive epoetin alfa.

Detailed description

Anemia is associated with loss of function in some studies. However, it is unknown if more rapid correction of anemia in patients who enter a rehabilitation setting after surgery or from hospitalization for acute medical problems leads to shorter rehabilitation stays and improved functional status. Patients aged 60 and older who have hemoglobin levels of less than 10.5 g/dL will be randomized to receive 8 weekly doses of either erythropoietin alfa or placebo. Functional status will be measured at baseline and then at 3, 8 and 12 weeks. The following specific aims will be tested in this study: * Determine the prevalence of anemia in patients admitted to a subacute rehabilitation facility with potential for recovery. * Determine the baseline functional status of patients admitted to a subacute rehabilitation facility with potential for recovery using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), an assessment tool used in acute rehabilitation settings. * Determine if administration of epoetin alfa will result in higher hemoglobin concentrations in patients receiving the drug than in patients given placebo at 3, 8 and 12 weeks after entry into the study. * Perform a study that establishes the feasibility of a trial to test whether epoetin alfa produces improvements in the FIM, grip strength, the time it takes for patients to reach rehabilitation goals, activity monitor, fatigue, mood, functional recovery and reduces length of rehabilitation stay.

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

Sponsors

Ortho Biotech Clinical Affairs, L.L.C.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 60 years of age or older * Admission hemoglobin concentration of \< 10.5 g/dL. * Able to read and understand English. * Consent signed by subjects.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to randomize within 7 days of admission to rehabilitation center. * Folstein min-mental status score of \< 21. * Neuromuscular disease and/or disability; in clinical judgment of the investigators that do not have rehabilitation potential. * Diagnosis or evidence of carcinoma (excluding skin cancer other than melanoma) within the past five years * Admission for stroke with residual deficit * Wheelchair bound prior to acute event. * Dialysis dependent chronic renal failure * Home more than 1 hour drive from hospital. * Admitted to long term nursing or hospice care. * Active blood loss. * Known history of severe iron deficiency. * Hematological disease that results in anemia that may not respond to erythropoietin (including, but not limited to, myelodysplastic syndrome, hematological malignancy, hemolytic syndromes, hemoglobinopathy). * Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP \>200 mmHg or diastolic BP \>110 mmHg) after adequate antihypertensive therapy. * New onset seizures (within three months) or seizures not controlled by medication. * Objective diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis within the past 10 years. * Patients with a condition (e.g. psychiatric illness) or in a situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's compliance with study procedures. * Acute burns. * Treatment with any recombinant human erythropoietin within 30 days prior to enrollment. * Known hypersensitivity to human albumin or mammalian cell-derived products or recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). * Received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 30 days prior to the planned start of treatment. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Employees of the investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Hemoglobin Concentration at 8 Weeks After Entry Into the Study8 weeks following randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Stay in Subacute Rehabilitation Facility12 weeks following randomizationDays from randomization to discharge
Grip Strength3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomizationkilograms measured by hand held dynamometer
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomizationMeasure physical function scored 0 - 12 (better)
Motor-FIM Score3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomizationFIM Motor score ranges from 13 to 91 (most independent)
Activity Counts3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomizationActivity counts as measured by the Actigraph monitor. Higher counts indicate more activity.
POMS Depression-Dejection Scale3,8,12 weeksProfile of Mood States (POMS) Depression-Dejection Scale 15 item questionnaire to measure the degree of depressive thoughts. The scale ranges from 0 to 60 (most depressed).
FACIT Measurement System Fatigue Scale3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomizationFatigue score ranges from 0 to 72. Lower score represents less fatigue

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects recruited at two subacute rehabilitation facilities in Central New Jersey between October 2005 and March 2008

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo & Niferex
Placebo (for epoetin alpha) subcutaneous injection weekly for 8 weeks and Niferex 150 mg twice a day for 8 weeks
11
Epoetin Alpha & Niferex
40,000 IU (initial dose) epoetin alpha subcutaneous injection weekly for 8 weeks and Niferex 150 mg twice a day for 8 weeks
11
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo & NiferexEpoetin Alpha & NiferexTotal
Age, Continuous74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
75.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
75.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Days From Admit to Randomization5.5 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
5.3 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
5.4 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
FACIT Fatigue Scale31.6 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
29.2 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
30.4 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
FIM Motor Scale74.2 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
68.8 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
71.5 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Hemoglobin Level9.8 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
9.8 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
9.8 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
POMS Depression-Dejection Scale3 Scores on a Scale3 Scores on a Scale3 Scores on a Scale
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 111 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Hemoglobin Concentration at 8 Weeks After Entry Into the Study

Time frame: 8 weeks following randomization

Population: Intention to treat; of the subjects not lost to follow-up, 3 subjects in the placebo arm \& 2 subjects in the epoetin alpha arm were not available for 8 week hemoglobin draw

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexMean Hemoglobin Concentration at 8 Weeks After Entry Into the Study11.9 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.2
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexMean Hemoglobin Concentration at 8 Weeks After Entry Into the Study13.6 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Activity Counts

Activity counts as measured by the Actigraph monitor. Higher counts indicate more activity.

Time frame: 3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 3 weeks (n=8; n=9)51.13 CountsStandard Deviation 27
Placebo & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 8 weeks (n=9; n=6)58.78 CountsStandard Deviation 32.8
Placebo & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)61.60 CountsStandard Deviation 27.2
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 3 weeks (n=8; n=9)41.56 CountsStandard Deviation 28.1
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 8 weeks (n=9; n=6)70.17 CountsStandard Deviation 27.3
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexActivity CountsActivity Counts at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)77.75 CountsStandard Deviation 44.6
Comparison: Activity Counts at 3 weeksp-value: 0.37Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Activity Counts at 8 weeksp-value: 0.69Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Activity Counts at 12 weeksp-value: 0.36Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

FACIT Measurement System Fatigue Scale

Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 72. Lower score represents less fatigue

Time frame: 3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 3 weeks (n=8; n=9)38.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Placebo & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)39.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Placebo & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)42.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 3 weeks (n=8; n=9)35.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)42.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexFACIT Measurement System Fatigue ScaleFACIT at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)38.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Comparison: FACIT at 3 weeksp-value: 0.64Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: FACIT at 8 weeksp-value: 0.83Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: FACIT at 12 weeksp-value: 0.46Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Grip Strength

kilograms measured by hand held dynamometer

Time frame: 3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 3 weeks (n=9; n=10)19.0 kgStandard Deviation 4
Placebo & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)19.4 kgStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)17.4 kgStandard Deviation 3.5
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 3 weeks (n=9; n=10)18.4 kgStandard Deviation 3.1
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)19.6 kgStandard Deviation 4.2
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexGrip StrengthGrip Strength at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)19.0 kgStandard Deviation 3.6
Comparison: Grip strength at 3 weeksp-value: 0.66Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Grip strength at 8 weeksp-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Grip strength at 12 weeksp-value: 0.53Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Length of Stay in Subacute Rehabilitation Facility

Days from randomization to discharge

Time frame: 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexLength of Stay in Subacute Rehabilitation Facility13.1 DaysStandard Deviation 5.2
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexLength of Stay in Subacute Rehabilitation Facility17.4 DaysStandard Deviation 9
p-value: 0.21Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Motor-FIM Score

FIM Motor score ranges from 13 to 91 (most independent)

Time frame: 3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 3 weeks (n=9; n=9)76.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Placebo & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)81.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Placebo & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)85.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 3 weeks (n=9; n=9)77.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)85.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexMotor-FIM ScoreFIM at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)85.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Comparison: FIM at 3 weeksp-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: FIM at 8 weeksp-value: 0.17Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: FIM at 12 weeksp-value: 0.59Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

POMS Depression-Dejection Scale

Profile of Mood States (POMS) Depression-Dejection Scale 15 item questionnaire to measure the degree of depressive thoughts. The scale ranges from 0 to 60 (most depressed).

Time frame: 3,8,12 weeks

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 3 weeks (n=9; n=10)1 Scores on a Scale
Placebo & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)1 Scores on a Scale
Placebo & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 12 weeks (n=10; n=7)1 Scores on a Scale
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 3 weeks (n=9; n=10)3.5 Scores on a Scale
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)0 Scores on a Scale
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexPOMS Depression-Dejection ScalePOMS at 12 weeks (n=10; n=7)0 Scores on a Scale
Comparison: POMS at 3 weeksp-value: 0.97Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: POMS at 8 weeksp-value: 0.46Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: POMS at 12 weeksp-value: 0.68Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score

Measure physical function scored 0 - 12 (better)

Time frame: 3, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization

Population: exact numbers of subjects analyzed at each time point vary based on time of study withdrawal for those who withdrew and availability of subject for those who were under active follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 3 weeks (n=9; n=9)3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)7.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)8.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 3 weeks (n=9; n=9)3.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 8 weeks (n=9; n=7)7.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Epoetin Alpha & NiferexShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ScoreSPPB at 12 weeks (n=10; n=8)7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Comparison: SPPB at 3 weeksp-value: 0.96Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: SPPB at 8 weeksp-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: SPPB at 12 weeksp-value: 0.66Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026