Skip to content

Comparison of Warfarin Dosing Using Decision Model Versus Pharmacogenetic Algorithm

Warfarin Dosing: Pharmacogenetic Algorithm Compared to Pharmacist's Dosing

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00511173
Enrollment
102
Registered
2007-08-03
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2012-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

mechanical valve

Brief summary

This is a prospective comparison of clinician dosing and a pharmacogenetic algorithm in diagnosed patients requiring warfarin therapy.

Detailed description

Diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, or deep venous thrombosis requiring warfarin therapy will be consented and a tube of blood for DNA analysis will be drawn. The clinician dosing group will not be eligible to obtain the pharmacogenetic results and the algorithm group will have their warfarin pharmacogenetic SNPs performed and integrated into the algorithm and the warfarin dose will be calculated. Outcomes of patients receiving both methods will be gathered and statistically analyzed.

Interventions

GENETICWarfarin Dose based on pharmacogenetics

Warfarin dose adjustment will be based on the standard clinician dosing compared to the use of the pharmacogenetic base algorithm

Sponsors

Creighton University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism requiring warfarin therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, or pullmonary embolism requiring warfarin therapy who do not consent to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In Patients Receiving Warfarin, a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm Dose Was Compared to Clinician Dosing (mg/wk).six monthsWarfarin pharmacogenetic algorithm dosing (mg/wk) was compared to clinician warfarin dosing (mg/wk).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects will be recruited from the warfarin clinic at the Creighton Cardiac Center from 7/06-6/07.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pharmacist Dosing
Warfarin dose based on pharmacist dosing
102
Total102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPharmacist Dosing
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
36 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
66 Participants
Age Continuous70 years
Baseline INR2.6 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
warfarin dose35.4 mg/wk
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

In Patients Receiving Warfarin, a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm Dose Was Compared to Clinician Dosing (mg/wk).

Warfarin pharmacogenetic algorithm dosing (mg/wk) was compared to clinician warfarin dosing (mg/wk).

Time frame: six months

Population: power analysis based on data from Sconce, et al.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Algorithm DosingIn Patients Receiving Warfarin, a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm Dose Was Compared to Clinician Dosing (mg/wk).46.9 mg/wkStandard Deviation 7.5
Pharmacist DosingIn Patients Receiving Warfarin, a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm Dose Was Compared to Clinician Dosing (mg/wk).35.4 mg/wkStandard Deviation 16.4
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in warfarin dose (mg/wk) between pharmacist dosing and algorithm dosing. In order to gather all SNP groups, the power analysis resulted in \> 100 patients enrolled into each group.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026