Skip to content

Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Ceftriaxone in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00509106
Acronym
CAP
Enrollment
622
Registered
2007-07-31
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2017-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Pneumonia

Keywords

ceftaroline, Community-acquired pneumonia, CAP, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila spp, Legionella ssp, multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), antimicrobial resistance, pneumococci, beta-lactam, ceftaroline fosamil, ceftriaxone, antibiotic

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if the antibiotic ceftaroline is safe and effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Detailed description

Clinical trials is being held in different countries. The purpose of the study is to determine if the antibiotic ceftaroline is safe and effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Interventions

2 consecutive, 300 mg dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 12 hours for 5 to 7 days

DRUGCeftriaxone

1 g dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours for 5 to 7 days

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects randomized to receive ceftriaxone will receive ceftriaxone at a dose of 1 g infused over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h). Twelve hours after each dose of ceftriaxone and saline placebo (ie, between ceftriaxone doses), subjects in this group will receive two consecutive saline placebo infusions, each infused over 30 minutes q24h. The ceftriaxone and saline placebo infusions will correspond to the q12h infusions of ceftaroline, thereby maintaining the blind

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects with community-acquired pneumonia requiring: * initial hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting * infection requiring initial treatment with IV antimicrobial

Exclusion criteria

* Community-acquired pneumonia suitable for outpatient therapy with an oral antimicrobial agent * Respiratory tract infections not due to community-acquired bacterial pathogens * Infections resistant to ceftriaxone * Any condition requiring concomitant systemic corticosteroids * History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any ß-lactam antimicrobial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) Population8-15 days after last dose of study drugCure:Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of pneumonia (ie,CABP), or improvement to such an extent that further antimicrobial therapy was not necessary Failure: Any of the following: * Persistence, incomplete clinical resolution, or worsening in signs and symptoms of CABP that required alternative antimicrobial therapy * Treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) leading to discontinuation of study drug therapy, when subject required alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat the pneumonia * Death wherein pneumonia (ie,CABP) was considered causative Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared With That for Ceftriaxone at TOC in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Microbiological Success Rate at TOC8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Overall Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate at TOC8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Evaluate Safetyfirst dose, throughout the treatment period, and up to the TOC visit
Clinical Relapse at Late Follow Up (LFU) Visit21-35 days after last dose of study drug
Microbiological Reinfection/Recurrence at LFU21 to 35 days after last dose of study drug
Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at TOC8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)Last day of study drug administration

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Bulgaria, Chile, Germany, Hungary, India, Latvia, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited worldwide from July 2007 to August 2008

Pre-assignment details

Patients were screened for up to 24 hours

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
Ceftaroline fosamil was administered in two consecutive 300 mg IV infusions over 30 minutes, every 12 hours (q12h).
315
IV Ceftriaxone
Ceftriaxone was administered as a 1-g IV infusion over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h).
307
Total622

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event32
Overall StudyAt the request of sponsor/investigator12
Overall StudyDeath66
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1610
Overall StudyNoncompliance01
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyWithdrew consent48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalIV CeftriaxoneCeftaroline Fosamil for Injection
Age, Continuous59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Age, Customized
<65 years
356 participants173 participants183 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
266 participants134 participants132 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
231 Participants105 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
391 Participants202 Participants189 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
67 / 31549 / 307
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 31539 / 307

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) Population

Cure:Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of pneumonia (ie,CABP), or improvement to such an extent that further antimicrobial therapy was not necessary Failure: Any of the following: * Persistence, incomplete clinical resolution, or worsening in signs and symptoms of CABP that required alternative antimicrobial therapy * Treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) leading to discontinuation of study drug therapy, when subject required alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat the pneumonia * Death wherein pneumonia (ie,CABP) was considered causative Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome

Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Population: The MITTE Population consisted of all subjects in the MITT Population (all randomized subjects who received any amount of the study drug) in PORT Risk Class III or IV. The Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) scale of CAP severity in which Risk Class I is associated with the lowest risk for mortality and Risk Class V represents the highest risk.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ceftaroline Fosamil for InjectionClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationClinical cure235 participants
Ceftaroline Fosamil for InjectionClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationClinical failure47 participants
Ceftaroline Fosamil for InjectionClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationIndeterminate7 participants
IV CeftriaxoneClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationClinical cure206 participants
IV CeftriaxoneClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationClinical failure56 participants
IV CeftriaxoneClinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at the Test of Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent to Treat Efficacy (MITTE) PopulationIndeterminate11 participants
Comparison: The primary objective of this study was to determine the noninferiority in the clinical cure rate for ceftaroline compared with that for ceftriaxone at TOC in the MITTE Population in adult subjects with CABP.95% CI: [-1, 12.7]
Primary

Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared With That for Ceftriaxone at TOC in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population

Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at TOC

Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

Clinical Relapse at Late Follow Up (LFU) Visit

Time frame: 21-35 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)

Time frame: Last day of study drug administration

Secondary

Evaluate Safety

Time frame: first dose, throughout the treatment period, and up to the TOC visit

Secondary

Microbiological Reinfection/Recurrence at LFU

Time frame: 21 to 35 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

Microbiological Success Rate at TOC

Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary

Overall Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate at TOC

Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026