Skip to content

Feasibility and Practice Characteristics of FNS and Gait Robot

Feasibility and Practice Characteristics of FNS and Gait Robot

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00508755
Enrollment
6
Registered
2007-07-30
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2014-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

cerebrovascular accident, electrical stimulation, gait training, motor learning

Brief summary

Conventional therapies do not restore normal gait for many stroke survivors. The long-term goal of this work is to restore volitional lower limb motor control and gait following stroke. In our prior work, we demonstrated that it was feasible to provide a clinically operated, combined treatment of body weight supported treadmill training alone (BWSTT) + functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) using intramuscular (IM) electrodes (FNS-IM). Specific Aims and Hypothesis The purpose or Specific Aim of the study is to test the feasibility and gait training potential of combining the Lokomat and FNS-IM for stroke survivors. Given the feasibility of our clinically operated combination of BWSTT + FNS-IM, we propose to test the feasibility of the combination of Lokomat + FNS-IM. Hypothesis I. It is feasible to utilize a clinically operated combination of Lokomat + functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) with intramuscular (IM) electrodes (FNS-IM). Treatment Procedures. The subjects will be treated for three months, four sessions/week (for a total of 48 treatment visits). A given session will be 1 hrs, with the time divided into thirds as follows: 1) hr coordination exercise; 2) hr over ground gait training; and 3) hr Lokomat gait training. FNS-IM will be used in all three aspects of the protocol, unless the subject is capable of volitionally executing a given movement or gait component. Population. The subjects will be chronic stroke survivors (\>6 months after the stroke).

Interventions

DEVICEGait Robot

gait training with the use of a gait robot

DEVICEFunctional Neuromuscular stimulation with intramuscular electrodes

gait training with use of functional electrical stimulation

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Greater than or equal to 6 months after stroke * 21 years or older * Ability to follow 2 step commands * Inability to move leg normally

Exclusion criteria

* Pacemaker * Progressive medical condition (i.e. Parkinsons Disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.visit 48, following treatmentObservational Gait components during stance and swing phase, for pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle for each of the six participants was observed during the following conditions: Gait Robot-alone, FES-alone, and combined Gait Robot and FES.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited through use of advertisement and by word of mouth to enter this feasibility study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gait Training After Stroke
Subjects with chronic stroke (.5-1.5 years post stroke) received gait training with the use of functional neuromuscular stimulation with intramuscular electrodes and gait robot.
6
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGait Training After Stroke
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Observational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.

Observational Gait components during stance and swing phase, for pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle for each of the six participants was observed during the following conditions: Gait Robot-alone, FES-alone, and combined Gait Robot and FES.

Time frame: visit 48, following treatment

Population: The sample size for this feasibility study was n=6, constrained by funding limit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Gait Robot-alone TrainingObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for knee control-stance phase6 participants
Gait Robot-alone TrainingObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for lateral weight shift0 participants
Gait Robot-alone TrainingObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for ankle movement in sagittal plane6 participants
FES-AloneObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for knee control-stance phase6 participants
FES-AloneObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for lateral weight shift6 participants
FES-AloneObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for ankle movement in sagittal plane6 participants
Combined Gait Robot and FESObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for lateral weight shift6 participants
Combined Gait Robot and FESObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for ankle movement in sagittal plane6 participants
Combined Gait Robot and FESObservational Gait Components: Observational Comparison of Gait Components for: Gait Robot-alone Condition, FES-alone Condition, and Combined Gait Robot and FES.allowed for knee control-stance phase6 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026