Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rivastigmine 10 and 15 cm^2 Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Showing Cognitive Decline

A 48-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Evaluation of the Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Exelon® 10 and 15 cm^2 Patch in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Showing Functional and Cognitive Decline

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00506415
Enrollment
1584
Registered
2007-07-25
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2012-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's, Patch, Cognitive, Decline

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to support the optimal use of rivastigmine patch in long-term treatment of Alzheimer's Disease in patients demonstrating functional and cognitive decline at the target maintenance dose of rivastigmine patch 10 cm\^2.

Interventions

DRUGRivastigmine 5 cm^2

5 cm\^2 transdermal patch

DRUGRivastigmine 10 cm^2

10 cm\^2 transdermal patch.

DRUGRivastigmine 15 cm^2

15 cm\^2 transdermal patch.

DRUGPlacebo to 15 cm^2 patch

Placebo of rivastigmine transdermal patch 15 cm\^2.

DRUGPlacebo to 10 cm^2 patch

Placebo of rivastigmine transdermal patch 10 cm\^2.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients between 50 and 85 years of age with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimers Disease, * Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 10-24 inclusive, * A primary caregiver willing to accept responsibility for supervising treatment, assessing the patient's condition throughout the study, and for providing input into efficacy assessments. * For double blind only: Meet the decline criteria of functional (as assessed by the investigator) and cognitive (assessed by a 1 point reduction in Mini-Mental State Examination) score between visits or a 3 point reduction from baseline) decline at weeks 23, 36 or 48.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of an advanced, severe, progressive, or unstable disease of any type that could interfere with efficacy and safety assessments or put the patient at particular risk, * Any medical or neurological condition other than Alzheimers Disease that could explain the patient's dementia, * A diagnosis of probable or possible vascular dementia, * A current diagnosis of unsuccessfully-treated depression, or any other mental disorder that may interfere with the evaluation of the patient's response to study medication, * A history or current diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (e.g. stroke), * A current diagnosis of severe or unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g. unstable coronary artery disease). Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Subscale at Week 48 of Double Blind PeriodBaseline and week 48 of double blind periodThe Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-cog) subscale comprises 11 items summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale Score From Baseline to Week 48 of Double Blind PeriodBaseline and week 48 of double blind periodThe Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) is a 16 item subscale of the caregiver-based ADCS-IADL scale, developed for the use in dementia studies. The ADCS-IADL total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating less severe impairment. A positive change indicates an improvement from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part B) at Week 48 of Double Blind PeriodBaseline and week 48 of double blind periodChange from baseline to week 48 in total time to perform Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. This test provides information on visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions. TMT has two parts: Part A requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for TMT-Part B except the person must alternate between numbers and letters. Total values for TMT part B range between 0 and 420 seconds. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in condition.
Time to Functional Decline as Measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale During the Double Blind Period390 days was the maximumFunctional decline was defined by either an at least 1 point decrease in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) subscale score in a visit and confirmed by the following visit/assessment or at least 2 points decrease from the double blind randomization baseline.
Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events30 days after a maximum of 96 weeks treatment
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 Score at Week 48 of Double Blind PeriodBaseline and week 48 of double blind periodChange from baseline to week 48 as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 total score. The scale consists of 10 domains that are rated for both frequency (range 1-4) and severity (range 1-3). A composite score for each domain is calculated (frequency x severity) which ranges from 1 to 12. There is a leading question for each item. If the symptom is not present then the frequency, severity and distress scores are not completed. In this case the score is 0 for the item. The sum of the composite scores yields the NPI-10 total score (range 0-120). A negative change in score indicates an improvement from baseline (symptom reduction).
Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part A) at Week 48 of the Double Blind PeriodBaseline and week 48 of double blind periodChange from baseline to week 48 in total time to perform Trail Making Test (TMT) part A. This test provides information on visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions. The TMT part A requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. The score represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Total values for TMT part A range between 0 and 300 seconds. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1,584 participants were enrolled, 1582 received study drug during the initial open label period; of these, 567 were qualified to enter a double blind randomized period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Patients
Total number of patients enrolled in the initial open label period that may have been randomized in the double blind period or may have continued in the extended open label period.
1,584
Total1,584

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Administrative problems0320
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Adverse Event033280
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Condition no longer requires study drug0010
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Death0530
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Lost to Follow-up0460
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Protocol Violation0530
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect013130
Double Blind (Maximum 48 Weeks )Withdrawal by Subject020170
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Administrative problems0004
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Adverse Event00018
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Death0007
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up0008
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Protocol Violation0005
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect0006
Extended Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject00014
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Abnormal laboratory value1000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Abnormal test procedure results1000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Administrative problem7000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Adverse Event272000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Death22000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up22000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Protocol Violation28000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect58000
Initial Open Label (Maximum 48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject88000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Patients
Age Continuous74.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.131
Sex: Female, Male
Female
992 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
592 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
732 / 1,582110 / 283151 / 280112 / 457
serious
Total, serious adverse events
227 / 1,58244 / 28344 / 28059 / 457

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Subscale at Week 48 of Double Blind Period

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-cog) subscale comprises 11 items summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 48 of double blind period

Population: Intent to treat population double blind (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive and Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Subscale at Week 48 of Double Blind Period4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.49
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Subscale at Week 48 of Double Blind Period4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Primary

Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale Score From Baseline to Week 48 of Double Blind Period

The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) is a 16 item subscale of the caregiver-based ADCS-IADL scale, developed for the use in dementia studies. The ADCS-IADL total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating less severe impairment. A positive change indicates an improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 48 of double blind period

Population: Intent to treat population double blind (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive and Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale Score From Baseline to Week 48 of Double Blind Period-6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale Score From Baseline to Week 48 of Double Blind Period-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 Score at Week 48 of Double Blind Period

Change from baseline to week 48 as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 total score. The scale consists of 10 domains that are rated for both frequency (range 1-4) and severity (range 1-3). A composite score for each domain is calculated (frequency x severity) which ranges from 1 to 12. There is a leading question for each item. If the symptom is not present then the frequency, severity and distress scores are not completed. In this case the score is 0 for the item. The sum of the composite scores yields the NPI-10 total score (range 0-120). A negative change in score indicates an improvement from baseline (symptom reduction).

Time frame: Baseline and week 48 of double blind period

Population: Intent to treat population double blind (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients with an assessment at baseline and week 48, who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables (ADAS-cog, ADCS-IADL).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 Score at Week 48 of Double Blind Period0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.98
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-10 Score at Week 48 of Double Blind Period1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51
Secondary

Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part A) at Week 48 of the Double Blind Period

Change from baseline to week 48 in total time to perform Trail Making Test (TMT) part A. This test provides information on visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions. The TMT part A requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. The score represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Total values for TMT part A range between 0 and 300 seconds. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 48 of double blind period

Population: Intent to treat population (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients with an assessment at baseline and week 48 who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables (ADAS-cog and ADCS-IADL).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part A) at Week 48 of the Double Blind Period18.2 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 62.57
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part A) at Week 48 of the Double Blind Period16.3 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 66.09
Secondary

Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part B) at Week 48 of Double Blind Period

Change from baseline to week 48 in total time to perform Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. This test provides information on visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions. TMT has two parts: Part A requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for TMT-Part B except the person must alternate between numbers and letters. Total values for TMT part B range between 0 and 420 seconds. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in condition.

Time frame: Baseline and week 48 of double blind period

Population: Intent to treat population (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients with an assessment at baseline and week 48 who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables (ADAS-cog, ADCS-IADL).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part B) at Week 48 of Double Blind Period9.3 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 68.8
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Change in Attention and Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test (Part B) at Week 48 of Double Blind Period5.8 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 65.38
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events

Time frame: 30 days after a maximum of 96 weeks treatment

Population: The safety set included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events1135 Participants
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events193 Participants
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events210 Participants
Extended Open Label (10 cm^2)Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events263 Participants
Secondary

Time to Functional Decline as Measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale During the Double Blind Period

Functional decline was defined by either an at least 1 point decrease in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) subscale score in a visit and confirmed by the following visit/assessment or at least 2 points decrease from the double blind randomization baseline.

Time frame: 390 days was the maximum

Population: Intent to treat population double blind (ITT-DB): included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of double blind study drug, and had at least 1 post-randomization assessment for both co-primary efficacy variables: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive and Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (10 cm^2)Time to Functional Decline as Measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale During the Double Blind Period90 Time in days
Double Blind: Rivastigmine (15 cm^2)Time to Functional Decline as Measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) Subscale During the Double Blind Period91 Time in days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026