Skip to content

Two Approaches to Routine HIV Testing in a Hospital Emergency Department

Optimizing Strategies for Universal HIV Testing (The USHER Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00502944
Enrollment
4855
Registered
2007-07-18
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2012-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

HIV, Testing, HIV Seronegativity

Brief summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting.

Detailed description

About 25% of HIV infected people do not know that they are infected. These people lack medical care that could prolong their lives and access to counseling services that could prevent further spread of HIV. With so many people unaware of their HIV status, there is a clear need for more readily available HIV counseling, testing, and referral services throughout the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HIV testing in U.S. hospitals in which HIV infected patients make up at least 1% of the total patient population for that hospital. However, routine HIV testing in such hospitals is rarely carried out, which might be because the CDC has not specified who should perform routine HIV testing. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting. One approach will be led by an HIV counselor, and the other approach will be led by an emergency department staff member. For both approaches, the study will evaluate to what extent patients accept HIV testing, how well follow-up care is established, and the cost-effectiveness of the approach. Participants in this study will include adults who visit Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants will be randomly assigned to a counselor versus provider and will be asked to fill out a questionnaire while waiting in the emergency room. The questionnaire will be anonymous. Participants will then be offered an oral rapid HIV test. Test results will be available in about 20 minutes and will be provided to participants by either their assigned HIV counselor. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered a more definitive blood test to confirm HIV infection. The blood test results will be available 2 weeks from testing, and participants must return to the hospital to get their test results. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered counseling support and referral services by either their assigned HIV counselor or emergency department staff member. Follow-up care appointments will also be initiated at this time. For participants who test positive for HIV, the study will last about 6 months. There will be no follow-up visits for participants who do not test positive for HIV during their emergency room visit.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCounselor-based HIV screening

Participants will undergo oral HIV screening by HIV counselor and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

BEHAVIORALEmergency staff member-based HIV screening

Participants will undergo oral HIV screening by emergency staff member and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Waiting to receive care in the Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency room * English- or Spanish-speaking * Enters the emergency room when an HIV counselor is available

Exclusion criteria

* An estimated severity index score of 1 or 2 who have mechanical ventilation or are not deemed alert, awake, and oriented to person, place and time by the triage nurse * HIV infected

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Linkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected ParticipantsAssessed within 8 weeks after receipt of reactive rapid HIV test resultsWe define linkage to care as attendance at a first HIV clinic appointment where the following 3 events occur: 1) introduction to an HIV care primary provider; 2) receipt of confirmatory Western Blot HIV test results; and 3) phlebotomy for CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Rapid HIV Testing RateAssess on day subject enrolled into the studyWe defined the overall rapid HIV testing rate as the number of participants tested for HIV using the rapid test among those randomized to potentially be tested in each arm.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test Offer RateAssess on day subject enrolled into the studyThe offer rate of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of enrolled study participants who were actually offered a test.
Test Acceptance RateAssess on day subject enrolled into the studyAcceptance of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of study participants who received the HIV test among those offered the test.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place from February 7, 2007 to July 9, 2008 at Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department. Oral HIV testing was offered to eligible patients by either HIV counselors or emergency service assistants (existing members of emergency department personnel).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Counselor
Counselor-based HIV screening intervention where a dedicated HIV counselor does all the screening.
2,446
Provider
Emergency staff member-based HIV screening intervention where an emergency staff member does all the screening.
2,409
Total4,855

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCounselorProvider
Age Continuous37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Education
College Degree
955 participants517 participants438 participants
Education
High School Degree
1141 participants566 participants575 participants
Education
Less than High School
620 participants310 participants310 participants
Education
Missing
41 participants15 participants26 participants
Education
Some College
1409 participants696 participants713 participants
Education
Some Post-College/Graduate Degree
689 participants342 participants347 participants
Gender
Female
3139 participants1585 participants1554 participants
Gender
Male
1681 participants849 participants832 participants
Primary Language
English
3595 participants1788 participants1807 participants
Primary Language
Missing
38 participants21 participants17 participants
Primary Language
Other
291 participants154 participants137 participants
Primary Language
Spanish
931 participants483 participants448 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Asian-American
125 participants66 participants59 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1377 participants707 participants670 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
55 participants21 participants34 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-racial/Other
340 participants176 participants164 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American/Alaskan Native
20 participants12 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
1072 participants526 participants546 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
1866 participants938 participants928 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 1,38214 / 643
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,3820 / 643

Outcome results

Primary

Linkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected Participants

We define linkage to care as attendance at a first HIV clinic appointment where the following 3 events occur: 1) introduction to an HIV care primary provider; 2) receipt of confirmatory Western Blot HIV test results; and 3) phlebotomy for CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level.

Time frame: Assessed within 8 weeks after receipt of reactive rapid HIV test results

Population: DSMB recommended the trial be ended early for likely inability to obtain this primary outcome. Thus the outcomes reported in paper are the secondary and other pre-specified outcomes listed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CounselorLinkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected ParticipantsLinked to Care0 participants
CounselorLinkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected ParticipantsPositive HIV Test0 participants
ProviderLinkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected ParticipantsPositive HIV Test7 participants
ProviderLinkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected ParticipantsLinked to Care4 participants
Secondary

Overall Rapid HIV Testing Rate

We defined the overall rapid HIV testing rate as the number of participants tested for HIV using the rapid test among those randomized to potentially be tested in each arm.

Time frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CounselorOverall Rapid HIV Testing Rate1382 participants
ProviderOverall Rapid HIV Testing Rate643 participants
Comparison: HIV test completed among patients randomizedp-value: <0.00195% CI: [27, 32]Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Test Acceptance Rate

Acceptance of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of study participants who received the HIV test among those offered the test.

Time frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study

Population: Number of participants analyzed equals the number of participants offered a rapid HIV test. Many participants left the ED before the opportunity was available to offer the test.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CounselorTest Acceptance Rate1382 participants
ProviderTest Acceptance Rate643 participants
Comparison: HIV test accepted among patients offeredp-value: 0.0295% CI: [-8, -1]Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Test Offer Rate

The offer rate of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of enrolled study participants who were actually offered a test.

Time frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CounselorTest Offer Rate1959 participants
ProviderTest Offer Rate861 participants
Comparison: HIV test offeredp-value: <0.00195% CI: [42, 47]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026