Obesity, Morbid
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LAP-BAND AP System in severely obese patients.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study was to collect additional information about the safety and effectiveness of the LAP-BAND AP System in a real-life clinical setting. Effectiveness was assessed through the collection of weight loss data, as well as other secondary effectiveness measurements. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) related to treatment.
Interventions
Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient is scheduled to receive the LAP-BAND AP System * Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including: the Informed Consent Form (ICF), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) forms, follow-up schedule, completion of patient questionnaires.
Exclusion criteria
* Per the LAP-BAND AP System Directions For Use (DFU)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Percent Excess Weight | Baseline to 5 Years | Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | Baseline to 5 years | Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation. |
| Subject Reported Satiety | Baseline to 5 Years | Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire. |
| Subject Reported Quality of Life | Baseline to 5 Years | Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower). |
| Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) | Baseline to 5 years | The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
521 Subjects were enrolled (defined as signing the informed consent). 515 Subjects started treatment and underwent LAP-BAND implantation. 6 Subjects did not have the LAP-BAND implanted after enrolling and signing the informed consent.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| LAP-BAND Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System.
LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch. | 515 |
| Total | 515 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 |
| Overall Study | Explantation Surgery | 26 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 195 |
| Overall Study | Non-Compliance | 24 |
| Overall Study | Other loss to follow-up | 32 |
| Overall Study | Revision Surgery | 7 |
| Overall Study | Study closed by sponsor | 109 |
| Overall Study | Subject Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 34 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | LAP-BAND |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.89 |
| Age, Customized Median Age | 42.7 years |
| Baseline Excess Weight | 118.7 pounds (lbs) STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.46 |
| Baseline Weight | 273.9 pounds (lbs) STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.37 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline | 44.0 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 52 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 443 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 16 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other (Native American or unspecified) | 3 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 422 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 93 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 158 / 515 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 38 / 515 |
Outcome results
Change in Percent Excess Weight
Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years
Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP-BAND | Change in Percent Excess Weight | %EWL from baseline 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402) | -45.7 percentage of excess weight lost | Standard Deviation 21.26 |
| LAP-BAND | Change in Percent Excess Weight | %EWL from baseline 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304) | -50.8 percentage of excess weight lost | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
| LAP-BAND | Change in Percent Excess Weight | %EWL from baseline 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226) | -47.7 percentage of excess weight lost | Standard Deviation 30.21 |
| LAP-BAND | Change in Percent Excess Weight | %EWL from baseline 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156) | -46.5 percentage of excess weight lost | Standard Deviation 27.23 |
| LAP-BAND | Change in Percent Excess Weight | %EWL from baseline 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84) | -45.9 percentage of excess weight lost | Standard Deviation 26.8 |
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP-BAND | Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | BMI at 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402) | 35.9 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.39 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | BMI at 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304) | 34.8 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.49 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | BMI at 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226) | 35.2 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.98 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | BMI at 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156) | 35.1 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation | BMI at 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84) | 35.2 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.49 |
Subject Reported Quality of Life
Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).
Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years
Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Quality of Life | OWL-QOL-17 Score at Baseline (n=496) | 69.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.98 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Quality of Life | OWL-QOL-17 Score at Month 60 (n=74) | 34.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
Subject Reported Satiety
Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years
Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Hunger at Baseline (n=487) | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Hunger at Month 60 (n=81) | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Fullness at Baseline (n=488) | 3.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Fullness at Month 60 (n=81) | 3.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Desire to Eat at Baseline (n=488) | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Satiety | Level of Desire to Eat at Month 60 (n=81) | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) | Reported Sleepiness at Baseline (n=498) | 8.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.23 |
| LAP-BAND | Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) | Reported Sleepiness at Month 60 (n=79) | 5.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.21 |