Skip to content

LAP-BAND AP Early Experience Trial (APEX)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00501085
Enrollment
521
Registered
2007-07-13
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2015-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LAP-BAND AP System in severely obese patients.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study was to collect additional information about the safety and effectiveness of the LAP-BAND AP System in a real-life clinical setting. Effectiveness was assessed through the collection of weight loss data, as well as other secondary effectiveness measurements. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) related to treatment.

Interventions

DEVICELAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System

Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.

Sponsors

Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is scheduled to receive the LAP-BAND AP System * Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including: the Informed Consent Form (ICF), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) forms, follow-up schedule, completion of patient questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Per the LAP-BAND AP System Directions For Use (DFU)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percent Excess WeightBaseline to 5 YearsSubjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBaseline to 5 yearsSubjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.
Subject Reported SatietyBaseline to 5 YearsSubjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.
Subject Reported Quality of LifeBaseline to 5 YearsQuality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).
Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)Baseline to 5 yearsThe Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

521 Subjects were enrolled (defined as signing the informed consent). 515 Subjects started treatment and underwent LAP-BAND implantation. 6 Subjects did not have the LAP-BAND implanted after enrolling and signing the informed consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LAP-BAND
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
515
Total515

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event4
Overall StudyExplantation Surgery26
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up195
Overall StudyNon-Compliance24
Overall StudyOther loss to follow-up32
Overall StudyRevision Surgery7
Overall StudyStudy closed by sponsor109
Overall StudySubject Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLAP-BAND
Age, Continuous42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.89
Age, Customized
Median Age
42.7 years
Baseline Excess Weight118.7 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.46
Baseline Weight273.9 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.37
Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline44.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
52 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
443 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
16 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other (Native American or unspecified)
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
422 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
93 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
158 / 515
serious
Total, serious adverse events
38 / 515

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Percent Excess Weight

Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAP-BANDChange in Percent Excess Weight%EWL from baseline 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)-45.7 percentage of excess weight lostStandard Deviation 21.26
LAP-BANDChange in Percent Excess Weight%EWL from baseline 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)-50.8 percentage of excess weight lostStandard Deviation 26.7
LAP-BANDChange in Percent Excess Weight%EWL from baseline 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)-47.7 percentage of excess weight lostStandard Deviation 30.21
LAP-BANDChange in Percent Excess Weight%EWL from baseline 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)-46.5 percentage of excess weight lostStandard Deviation 27.23
LAP-BANDChange in Percent Excess Weight%EWL from baseline 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)-45.9 percentage of excess weight lostStandard Deviation 26.8
Secondary

Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation

Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.

Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAP-BANDSubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBMI at 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)35.9 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.39
LAP-BANDSubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBMI at 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)34.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.49
LAP-BANDSubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBMI at 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)35.2 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.98
LAP-BANDSubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBMI at 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)35.1 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.2
LAP-BANDSubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBMI at 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)35.2 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.49
Secondary

Subject Reported Quality of Life

Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).

Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAP-BANDSubject Reported Quality of LifeOWL-QOL-17 Score at Baseline (n=496)69.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.98
LAP-BANDSubject Reported Quality of LifeOWL-QOL-17 Score at Month 60 (n=74)34.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Secondary

Subject Reported Satiety

Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.

Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Hunger at Baseline (n=487)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Hunger at Month 60 (n=81)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Fullness at Baseline (n=488)3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Fullness at Month 60 (n=81)3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Desire to Eat at Baseline (n=488)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
LAP-BANDSubject Reported SatietyLevel of Desire to Eat at Month 60 (n=81)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Secondary

Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAP-BANDSubject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)Reported Sleepiness at Baseline (n=498)8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
LAP-BANDSubject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)Reported Sleepiness at Month 60 (n=79)5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026