Skip to content

A Prospective Comparative Study of Induction of Labor With a Cervical Ripening Double Balloon vs Foley Catheter

A Prospective Comparative Study of Induction of Labor With a Cervical Ripening Double Balloon vs Foley Catheter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00501033
Enrollment
200
Registered
2007-07-13
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2008-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean, Endometritis, Induction of Labor

Keywords

Induction of labor, Cesarean, Endometritis, Foley, Infections

Brief summary

Hypothesis: The induction of labor in patients with unfavorable Bishop score is a challenging obstetrical process, and may be influenced or complicated by the cervical ripening method used. We will conduct a comparative study of the foley catheter vs the cervical ripening double balloon (Cook medical, GPN: G48149). We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infections and postpartum complications, especially endometritis.

Detailed description

We will conduct a comparative study of the foley catheter vs the cervical ripening double balloon (Cook medical, GPN: G48149). We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infections and postpartum complications, especially endometritis. The study will include 200 parturients, 100 primiparous and 100 multiparous women. We will randomize each group to induction with the foley catheter or the cervical ripening double balloon. We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infectious and other postpartum complications, especially endometritis.

Interventions

DEVICEMechanical induction of labor
DEVICEFoley Catheter

Sponsors

Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Term pregnancy * Parturients candidates for mechanical induction of labor

Exclusion criteria

* Suspected amnionitis * Vaginal discharge * Pre induction pyrexia * Immunocompromised parturients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success of labor inductionPostpartum period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postpartum endometritis rateThe postpartum period
Cesarean section rateDelivery

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026