Skip to content

Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Mild to Moderate Hypertension

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 300/25 mg Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 160/25 mg Using Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00500604
Acronym
COSIMA2
Enrollment
1617
Registered
2007-07-12
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2010-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Brief summary

The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 300/25mg against valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/25mg in reducing mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) as measured by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after 24 weeks compared with baseline. The secondary objectives are: * To compare the percentage of patients with normal blood pressure as measured by HBPM and at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24 * To compare the differences in mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), mean morning and evening SBP and DBP evaluated by HBPM at weeks 16 and 24 * To compare the difference in mean SBP evaluated by HBPM at week 16 * To compare the differences in mean SBP and DBP evaluated at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24 * To determine the incidence and severity of adverse events

Interventions

150/12.5mg tablet and 300/12.5mg tablet

80/12.5mg tablet and 160/12.5mg tablet

DRUGHydrochlorothiazide

12.5 mg administered orally, once daily in the morning

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Established essential hypertension, untreated or treated but uncontrolled with treatment: * Office SBP ≥ 160 mmHg for untreated patients * Office SBP ≥ 140 mmHg for patients already treated with an antihypertensive drug. * Previous antihypertensive therapy must have been implemented for a minimum of 4 weeks and must be either monotherapy or one of the following permitted combination drugs: * ACE inhibitor / calcium channel blocker * Beta blocker / calcium channel blocker * Beta blocker / low dose diuretic * ACE inhibitor / low dose diuretic

Exclusion criteria

* SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg evaluated at doctor's office at Visit 1 * Known or suspected causes of secondary hypertension * Patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, a renal transplant or only has one functioning kidney * Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Significant cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, renal, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disease, a malignancy or any other diseases considered by the Investigator to make participation in the study not in the best interest of the subject * Known hypersensitivity to diuretics or sulphonamides or history of angioedema or cough related to the administration of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist or any combination of the drugs used * Known contraindications to any of the study drugs * Concomitant use of any other antihypertensive treatment * Use of any of the investigational products for this study within the 3 months prior to the study * Inability to obtain a valid HBPM recording i.e., obesity, arm circumference \> 32 cm or arrhythmia * Administration of any other investigational drug in the last 30 days before enrolment and during the course of the study * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Women of childbearing potential not protected by effective contraceptive method of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in mean DBP as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean morning and evening SBP as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean morning and evening DBP as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Adverse events, vital signs, laboratory testsFrom visit 1 to end of study
Number of normalised patients as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Number of normalised patients evaluated at the doctor's officeFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPMFrom week 0 to week 16
Reduction in mean SBP and mean DBP evaluated at the doctor's officeFrom week 0 to weeks 16 and 24

Countries

Egypt, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026