Skip to content

Pilot Study: Does Chiropractic Care Decrease Fall Risk in Older Adults

Pilot Study: Does Chiropractic Care Decrease Fall Risk in Older Adults?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00497965
Enrollment
30
Registered
2007-07-09
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2010-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Equilibrium

Keywords

Balance, Chiropractic, Older Adults

Brief summary

The purpose is to study the effect of chiropractic care on balance in older adults.

Detailed description

The specific aims of this pilot study are to: 1) build a recruitment pool of older adults within the local community; 2) establish a protocol for long-term surveillance of falls for older adult chiropractic patients; 3) explore dose-response patterns to chiropractic care by comparing Berg Balance Scale scores at 12 months from baseline in three groups of older adults with impaired balance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBalance Exercises

Sponsors

Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER)
CollaboratorOTHER
Cleveland Chiropractic College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 65 or older 2. Able to stand steadily without assistance on one leg for an average of \<5 seconds (determined by averaging the time for both legs) 3. Able to attend all scheduled sessions (by self-report)

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-ambulatory (wheelchair-bound); this precludes required balance testing; however, volunteers requiring assistive devices such as canes and walkers are not excluded 2. received chiropractic care or other manual care within the past three months (by self-report) 3. initiated exercise program for balance / lower body strength within the past month (by self-report) 4. contraindications to SMT or mild-exertion exercise, as determined by the clinician through physical exam and x-rays (if indicated). Contraindications include but are not limited to: signs and symptoms associated with vertebrobasilar insufficiency (including facial numbness, diplopia, drop attacks, dysphagia, and ataxia which are not fatiguable or habituable with repeated provocative head positioning); unstable or severe medical condition; severe osteoporosis, fracture or other osseous abnormalities; high cardiovascular risk, i.e. persons with known severe cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic disease, or one or more major signs/symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease 5. absence of indications for SMT, as determined by the clinician through history, physical exam, orthopedic tests, and static and motion palpation. Indications for SMT include identification of decreased or increased spinal joint mobility usually accompanied by tenderness and muscle tension and spasm; 6. unable to understand English adequately to complete study forms and questionnaires, because we do not have study personnel fluent in other languages; 7. central causes of vertigo, including arteriovenous malformations, cerebral hemorrhage, brainstem vascular disease, tumors and demyelenating diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean change scores for the BBS from baseline to 8 weeks will be compared with a one-factor analysis of variance. Post-hoc comparisons of means and associated confidence intervals will be evaluated using the Tukey test.Through December 2008

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026