Skip to content

Comparison of Activator Manipulation Versus Manual Side Posture Manipulation in Patients With Low Back Pain

Comparison of Mechanical Force, Manually Assisted Activator Manipulation Versus Manual Side Posture Manipulation in Patients With Low Back Pain: a Randomized Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00497861
Enrollment
40
Registered
2007-07-09
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2007-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

Low back pain, Chiropractic, Spinal manipulation, Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique

Brief summary

This study compared the treatment effect of Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique (AMCT) and manual Diversified type spinal manipulative therapy in a sample of patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of (MFMA) Activator instrument adjusting to manual side posture (HVL) adjustments in patients with acute low back pain. Primary outcomes measured include pain measurement with a VAS scale, the use of the Oswestry pain scale questionnaire, and the Bournemouth back pain scale questionnaire. An additional aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility of recruitment, data collection, and other procedures which can lead to additional studies with larger number of subjects including a control group.

Interventions

PROCEDUREActivator Methods Chiropractic Technique

Sponsors

Cleveland Chiropractic College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Being 18 years or older; 2. Having current acute or sub-acute low back pain defined as pain that has not lasted more than 16 weeks; 3. Minimum score of 30mm on a 100mm visual analog pain scale.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Revised OswestryDecember 2008

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026