Skip to content

Uterine Artery Occlusion for Fibroid Related Bleeding

An Evaluation of a Doppler-Guided Uterine Artery Occlusion Device as Treatment for the Reduction of Fibroid-Associated Bleeding

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00496067
Enrollment
91
Registered
2007-07-04
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2011-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Menorrhagia, Uterine Fibroids

Keywords

Fibroids, Menorrhagia, Menorrhagia associated with uterine fibroids

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Doppler guided Uterine Artery Occlusion (D-UAO) as treatment for the reduction of fibroid-associated symptoms.

Detailed description

DUAO is intended for bilateral occlusion of the uterine arteries

Interventions

DEVICEDoppler-Guided Uterine Artery Occlusion Device

For bilateral occlusion of the uterine arteries

Sponsors

Ethicon, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 25 to 50 years of age * Subject has a negative urine or blood pregnancy test prior to the procedure. At the time of enrollment to the study, the subject has no intent of further childbearing and intends to use appropriate contraception throughout the first 12 months of the study period (unless sterilized) * Normal pap smear within 36 months of study procedure (most recent) * Cervix suitable for tenaculum placement as determined by pelvic exam (adequate length of cervix, absence of cervical fibroid/lower fibroid to prevent clamp placement) * At least one intra-mural or sub-serosal or sub-mucosal uterine fibroid with a minimum diameter of greater than or equal to 3 cm, and all fibroids with a diameter less than or equal to 8cm with a prevailing pathology (e.g., as opposed to adenomyosis) of fibroids determined through ultrasound * Symptomatic subject presenting with at least one of the following fibroid symptoms: pelvic pressure, menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, pelvic pain, increasing abdominal girth or dyspareunia due to fibroids. * Subject has evidence of bilateral ureteric flow * Subject agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures and evaluations, and documents this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee-approved informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy as confirmed by positive urine or blood pregnancy test * Menopausal as defined by elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and decreased oestradiol hormone levels as determined by the hospital local laboratory reference range criteria * Presence of any pedunculated sub-mucosal or pedunculated sub-serosal fibroid(s) as determined by MRI, ultrasound or hysteroscopy * Presence of an intra-uterine device (IUD) * Any hydronephrosis as determined on renal ultrasound prior to the procedure * Clinical history of any thrombo-embolic disease or known thrombophilia * Blood Urine Nitrogen (BUN) greater than 7.2mmol/L\* and/or serum creatinine greater than 106μmol/L\* unresolved with change in diet or hydration * History or current evidence of gynecologic malignancy (confirmed by hysteroscopy or endometrial biopsy), atypical endometrial hyperplasia, or chronic pelvic inflammatory disease * Pelvic mass outside the uterus other than uterine fibroids * Any current acute or chronic systemic infection or localized pelvic infection, including a urinary tract infection * Use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist, danozol or mifepristone within 6-months prior to the start of the study procedure * Using anticoagulation therapy (except over the counter treatments (e.g. aspirin)), or have an underlying bleeding disorder * Unsuitable for MRI examination (e.g. severe claustrophobia, non-MRI-compatible implanted metalloid devices) * Prior endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, or uterine artery ligation * Poor procedural candidate due to medical conditions as determined by the investigator (e.g. anesthesia class, renal insufficiency, heart disease);

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lack of surgical re-interventionPost-op through end of study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean improvement in UFS-QOL Symptom Severity and HRQL transformed scores.6, 12 and 24 months
Mean HRQL subscales.6, 12 and 24 months
Percentage of subjects with reduction of 50% or greater in Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) score.6 and 12 months
Mean change in PBLAC scores.Baseline to 6 and 12 months
Percentage of subjects with decrease in fibroid load based on independent MRI review.6 months
Percentage of subjects with maintenance of menses as defined by continuation of menstrual cycles without an interruption of three consecutive months12 months
Percentage of subjects with improvement in Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) Symptom Severity and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) scores.6, 12 and 24 months
Lack of surgical re-intervention.24 months
Pain scoreDischarge or 24-hour post clamp removal, whichever is earlier
Days to normal activities (household, work and sexual intercourse)Post procedure
Euro-QOL expressed as change from baseline for each of the 6 domains and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Nights in hospitalTotal and post procedure
Percentage of subjects with procedural satisfaction as defined by responses of either satisfied or very satisfied.12 months

Countries

Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026