Skip to content

Comparison of Nevirapine and Efavirenz for the Treatment of HIV-TB Co-infected Patients (ANRS 12146 CARINEMO)

Randomized Non-inferiority Trial Comparing the Nevirapine-based Antiretroviral Therapy Versus the Standard Efavirenz-based ART for the Treatment of HIV-TB Co-infected Patients on Rifampicin-based Therapy (ANRS 12146 CARINEMO)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00495326
Acronym
CARINEMO
Enrollment
570
Registered
2007-07-03
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2012-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tuberculosis, Aids, Hiv Infections

Keywords

drug interactions, Treatment Naive

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of Nevirapine in HIV patients already treated against tuberculosis by Rifampicin is as efficient and as well tolerated as Efavirenz.

Detailed description

Anti Retroviral Therapy (ART) reduces tuberculosis (TB) incidence in HIV-infected patients and reduces mortality among TB patients with deep immune suppression. The Fixed Drug Combination (FDC) nevirapine (NVP)-lamivudine-stavudine is the first line ART available for low-income countries. Rifampicin (RMP), due to its liver induction effect, reduces significantly NVP plasma concentration, raising concerns regarding the risk of resistance and subsequent treatment failure. Therefore, in co-infected patients, WHO recommends delaying ART or using efavirenz (EFV)-based ART. Although EFV is also reduced at lower level, longitudinal studies report good efficacy and safety when given concomitantly with RMP. In low-income countries, poor access to EFV, contradiction during pregnancy and absence of FDC containing EFV lead to difficulties in HIV-TB treatment. Despite 2 limited retrospective studies and a non-randomised prospective study, which report good virological response at 6 months in co-infected patients receiving NVP and RMP co-administration, existing data are too limited to change the recommendation. The aim of the study is to compare, in terms of therapeutic efficacy and clinical safety, the nevirapine-based HAART to the standard efavirenz-based HAART, in HIV/TB co-infected patients receiving a rifampicin-based TB treatment. The study will evaluate one year after TB treatment initiation, whether the HAART efficacy (virological outcome, death or lost of follow-up) induced by NVP-based HAART is non-inferior to those induced by EFV based HAART, in patients receiving concomitantly HAART and RMP-based TB treatment.

Interventions

DRUGNevirapine based therapy

* Patients below 60 kg: 1 tablet twice a day of Triomune30®, including NVP 200 mg, 3TC 150 mg and D4T 30mg * Patients above 60kg: 1 tablet twice a day of Triomune40®, including NVP 200 mg, 3TC 150 mg and D4T 40 mg)

DRUGEfavirenz based therapy

Efavirenz EFV 200 mg (3 tablets/d) Lamivudine 3TC 300mg (2 tablets of 150mg/d) D4T generic 30mg or 40mg (2 tablets/d)

* Intensive phase: 2 months daily E(RMP)HZ. PTB smear positive patients at month 2 will receive 1 more month intensive phase. * Continuation phase: 4 months daily H(RMP). * Patients with meningitis will receive Streptomycin instead of E during intensive phase.

Sponsors

Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands
CollaboratorOTHER
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Person HIV infected * Aged of 18 years or more * Signed informed consent * New case of tuberculosis: patient who never received TB treatment or for less than 1 month * Patients receiving rifampicin based TB regimen since 4 to 6 weeks * CD4 cell count \< 250 cell/mm3 in the 4 weeks following the TB diagnosis * Naïve of HAART * For women of childbearing age, to have a negative plasmatic test for pregnancy and to accept to take a contraception or declare no wish of pregnancy in the coming year.

Exclusion criteria

* To have a positive plasmatic test for pregnancy * Karnofsky score \<60% * ALAT \> 4N (Hepatitis grade 3 or 4) * Ongoing psychiatric pathology * Refuse to participate in the study Amendment : * bilirubin \> grade 3 * any grade 4 clinical sign or biological result at time of inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Viral load measure (Virological failure will be defined after 2 consecutive measures as : More than 1 log10 increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration for patients with detectable viral load (> 50 copies/mL) at the previous dosage.)3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Increase of CD4 cell count induced by HAARTat 6 months and 1 year
Pharmacokinetic profile of nevirapine when combined with rifampicin2 months
Rifampicin plasma concentration dosage2 months
Immune Reconstitution Syndrome(IRIS)12 months
Deaths after one year12 months
Severe drugs side effects12 months
New or recurrent stage 3 or 4 HIV/AIDS related events12 months

Countries

Mozambique

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026