Skip to content

High Versus Low Dose Supplemental External Radiation With Pd-103 for Prostate Cancer

High Versus Low Dose Supplemental External Radiation With Pd-103 for Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00494546
Enrollment
568
Registered
2007-06-29
Start date
1999-01-31
Completion date
2007-06-30
Last updated
2007-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

prostate, brachytherapy

Brief summary

Objective: The objective of this study is test the hypothesis that delivering a higher percentage of the radiation dose as external radiation versus implant will lead to higher tumor control rates. Research design A total of 600 patients with AJC clinical stage T1-T2 prostatic carcinoma (Gleason grade 7 to 10 and/or PSA 10 to 20 ng/ml) will be randomized to treatment with 44 Gy versus 20 Gy external radiation plus a Pd-103 implant boost (90 Gy versus 105 Gy, respectively).

Detailed description

Objective: The objective of this study is test the hypothesis that delivering a higher percentage of the radiation dose as external radiation versus implant will lead to higher tumor control rates. Research design A total of 600 patients with AJC clinical stage T1-T2 prostatic carcinoma (Gleason grade 7 to 10 and/or PSA 10 to 20 ng/ml) will be randomized to treatment with 44 Gy versus 20 Gy external radiation plus a Pd-103 implant boost (90 Gy versus 105 Gy, respectively). Methodology: Patients will be randomized by the method of random permuted blocks. Cancer status will be monitored by serial serum PSA at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and yearly thereafter. Treatment-related morbidity will be monitored by personal interview, using standard American Urologic Association and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary endpoint will be based on serum PSA. A value above 1.0 ng/ml two years after treatment will be considered to have residual or recurrent cancer and to have failed therapy. Findings: 566 patients have been randomized and the study was closed due to slowing accrual. A preliminary analysis shows similar morbidity between the treatment arms, and nearly identical cancer control rates between randomization arms.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPd-103 with 20 vs 44 Gy supplemental beam XRT

Sponsors

Schiffler Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males * Prostate cancer * PSA 10-20 * Gleason score 7-10

Exclusion criteria

* Lymph nodes positive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
cancer control5-year post treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
rectal and urinary morbidity2- and 5-year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026