Skip to content

Hyper- and Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis Study

Dichlorphenamide vs. Placebo for Periodic Paralysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00494507
Acronym
HYP-HOP
Enrollment
71
Registered
2007-06-29
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis, Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis

Keywords

periodic paralysis, dichlorphenamide

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Dichlorphenamide with placebo (an inactive substance) for prevention of episodes and for improvement of strength in hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis. This study will also look at the long-term effects of Dichlorphenamide in periodic paralysis.

Detailed description

Periodic paralysis is a relatively rare, life-long disorder characterized by intermittent bouts of paralysis, progressive weakness, and diminished quality of life. Two drugs, acetazolamide (ACZ) and dichlorphenamide, have been prescribed to treat the disorder, however, dichlorphenamide is no longer available. In this multi-center, parallel, randomized trial researchers will compare the effects of dichlorphenamide vs. placebo in patients with hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis. The trial consists of two 9-week studies-one study will enroll persons with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and the other study will enroll persons with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: dichlorphenamide or placebo (an inactive substance). During the studies, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record the time, length, and severity of each episode of weakness (attack). The study coordinator will contact participants weekly to review the diary information. The 9-week phase will be followed by a 1-year open-label dichlorphenamide extension without placebo to determine the long-term effects of dichlorphenamide on the course of the disease and on inter-attack weakness. Duration of the trial for participants is approximately 65 weeks, including a screening phase to determine eligibility, the first 9-week treatment phase, and the one-year open-label extension phase.

Interventions

DRUGDichlorphenamide (double-blind)

50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day

Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet

DRUGDichlorphenamide (open-label)

50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Genetically definite, clinically definite or clinically probable Hyperkalemic or Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis as outlined in the protocol * Male and female participants, age 18 and older who are able to comply with the study conditions. * Participants who have distinct regular episodes of weakness with an average frequency of \> or = to 1 a week and \< or = to 3 a day either on or off treatment, whichever is higher * Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (any one of the following 3 criteria) 1. Prolonged QT interval or complex ventricular ectopy between attacks 2. Distinctive physical features (2 of the following 5) 1. Low set ears 2. Short stature 3. Hypo-/micrognathia 4. Clinodactyly 5. Hypo-/hypertelorism 3. KIR 2.1 gene mutation * Coincidental renal, hepatic, active thyroid disease, restrictive or obstructive lung disease, other neuromuscular disease, or heart disease * Chronic, non-congestive, angle-closure glaucoma * Use of any of the following medications for reasons other than treatment of periodic paralysis: diuretics, antiarrhythmics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics, magnesium * History of life-threatening episodes of respiratory muscle weakness or cardiac arrhythmias during attacks * Pregnancy * Known mutation in the alpha subunit of the sodium channel gene in hypokalemic periodic paralysis patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HYP Attack Rate8 weeksThe number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.
HOP Attack Rate8 weeksThe number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate8 weeksHYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate8 weeksHOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
HYP Attack Duration8 weeksHYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
HOP Attack Duration8 weeksHOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening0-9 weeksIncrease in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening0-9 weeksIncrease in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) ScoresBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) ScoresBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted NormalBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted NormalBaseline and 9 weeksThe strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body MassBaseline and 9 weeksLean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body MassBaseline and 9 weeksLean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary ScoreBaseline and 9 weeksThe Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Countries

Italy, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The original trial design included an Acetazolamide (ACZ) drug arm which was subsequently removed. Five participants randomized to ACZ and one ineligible participant are not included in the trial results reported here.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HYP Dichlorphenamide
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. Dichlorphenamide (double-blind): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day Dichlorphenamide (open-label): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
12
HYP Placebo
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. Placebo (double-blind): Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet Dichlorphenamide (open-label): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
9
HOP Dichlorphenamide
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. Dichlorphenamide (double-blind): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day Dichlorphenamide (open-label): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
24
HOP Placebo
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. Placebo (double-blind): Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet Dichlorphenamide (open-label): 50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
20
Total65

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind PhaseAdverse Event2010
Double-Blind PhaseNegative DNA test0001
Double-Blind PhaseSubject Non-compliance0010
Double-Blind PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1000
Open-Label PhaseAdverse Event0153
Open-Label PhaseWorsening Disease0002

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHYP DichlorphenamideHYP PlaceboHOP DichlorphenamideHOP PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.7
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
44.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants8 Participants4 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants3 Participants16 Participants16 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 123 / 912 / 1720 / 2411 / 2032 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 120 / 90 / 170 / 241 / 203 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

HOP Attack Rate

The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Attack Rate0.3 attacks per week
HYP PlaceboHOP Attack Rate2.4 attacks per week
Primary

HYP Attack Rate

The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Attack Rate0.9 attacks per week
HYP PlaceboHYP Attack Rate4.8 attacks per week
Secondary

HOP Attack Duration

HOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Attack Duration2.7 hours per week
HYP PlaceboHOP Attack Duration26.2 hours per week
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score

The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores-0.08 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.92
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores-0.27 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal-0.81 average percent of predicted normalStandard Deviation 11.27
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal-2.94 average percent of predicted normalStandard Deviation 7.2
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass

Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants who had lean body mass data available at baseline and week 9.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass-0.78 kgStandard Deviation 1.65
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass0.44 kgStandard Deviation 2.39
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score-1.10 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.93
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score-5.65 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.58
Secondary

HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score4.83 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.23
HYP PlaceboHOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score-3.75 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.61
Secondary

HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening

Increase in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.

Time frame: 0-9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening0 participants
HYP PlaceboHOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening5 participants
Secondary

HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate

HOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate0.6 severity-weighted attacks per week
HYP PlaceboHOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate5.7 severity-weighted attacks per week
Secondary

HYP Attack Duration

HYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Attack Duration10.5 hours per week
HYP PlaceboHYP Attack Duration39.4 hours per week
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score

The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores0.78 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.52
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores0.55 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal10.84 average percent of predicted normalStandard Deviation 8.27
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal10.17 average percent of predicted normalStandard Deviation 14.54
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass

Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants who had lean body mass data available at baseline and week 9.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass-1.31 kgStandard Deviation 1.94
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass-1.52 kgStandard Deviation 1.47
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score-3.77 T-scoreStandard Deviation 14.09
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score2.65 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.64
Secondary

HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score3.16 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.84
HYP PlaceboHYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score-0.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.82
Secondary

HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening

Increase in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.

Time frame: 0-9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening0 participants
HYP PlaceboHYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening2 participants
Secondary

HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate

HYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HYP DichlorphenamideHYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate1.0 severity-weighted attacks per week
HYP PlaceboHYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate5.8 severity-weighted attacks per week

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026