Skip to content

Rasagiline in the Treatment of Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Rasagiline in the Treatment of Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00492336
Enrollment
84
Registered
2007-06-27
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2019-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Cognitive impairments, Negative symptoms

Brief summary

This is a study of a new medication for the treatment of cognitive impairments (thinking difficulties) and negative symptoms in people with schizophrenia. The new medication is rasagiline. Rasagiline is a drug which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. It is used to treat cognitive problems.

Detailed description

The study will consist of two phases: a 4-week continued stability phase (lead-in phase) and a 12-week double-blind treatment phase. In the lead-in phase, subjects receiving antipsychotic medication, who manifest moderate to severe and persistent negative symptoms, will remain on their maintenance regimen for at least four weeks. The treatment phase will be a 12-week, parallel groups, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive rasagiline (1 mg/day), a selective MAO-B oxidase inhibitor.

Interventions

DRUGrasagiline (Pharmacodynamics)

Rasagiline 1 mg/day for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo 1 tablet each day

Sponsors

Stanley Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. * Current treatment with one or more second generation antipsychotics, except ziprasidone * On same second generation antipsychotic(s)for at least 56 days * On same dose of second generation antipsychotic(s)for at least 30 days * 22-item SANS: Total score (i.e.all items minus global items and poverty of content of speech)greater than 20 or global Rating of Affective Flattening greater than or equal to 3 or global Rating of alogia greater than or equal to 3 * BPRS: Sum of the four positive symptom items less than or equal to 16 (items 4,11,12,15) * BPRS: Sum of the four Anxiety/Depression Factor items less than or equal to 14 (items 1,2,5,9) * Simpson-Angus Scale: Total score less than or equal to 8

Exclusion criteria

* DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder within last 6 months * Current treatment with ziprasidone * DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence within the last 6 months * DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or substance abuse within the last month * evidence of illicit substance use, as identified with urine toxicology screen * History of an organic brain disorder, mental retardation,epilepsy, or a medical condition, whose pathology or treatment could alter the presentation or treatment of schizophrenia or significantly increase the risk associated with the proposed treatment protocol. See those listed below * Uncontrolled hypertension defined as BP exceeding 145/90 on 3 consecutive readings despite adequate treatment, pheochromocytoma, melanoma, hepatic insufficiency * Pregnancy or lactation in females * Pheochromocytoma * Melanoma * Hepatic insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Negative SymptomsEvery 4 weeks over a 12 week periodThe Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) rating scale was used to assess the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores on the subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score. There are a total of 17 subscales. Each subscale ranges from 0=Not at all to 5=Severe. Every 4 weeks the summed subscale scores provide a total score for that week (0-85). Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms.
Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreBeginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test designed to evaluate neuropsychological status of adults, ages 20-89. The 12 subtests measure attention, language, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. The raw scores from the subtests are scaled together to create index scores, and these are summed for conversion to a total scale score. Higher score equals a better outcome. The total index score range for the RBANS is 40-160.
Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive TaskBeginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.
Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskBeginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)To assess reward learning, participants used performance feedback to choose the most frequently rewarded item in each of three pairs of stimuli (one pair had reward probabilities: 80% vs 20%; one pair had reward probabilities of 70% vs 30%; one pair had the probabilities of 60% vs 40 %) (PL; Frank et al, 2004). A total of 240 trials were administered so each pair was seen 80 times. Higher scores represent more frequent choices of the optimal stimulus in each pair. The frequencies with which participants repeated an item choice that was rewarded on the previous presentation (win-stay) is also presented as a percentage. Similarly, the lose-shift score is the percentage of times that participants changed their choice for unrewarded items (lose-shift). The win-stay score serves as a measure of the impact of positive feedback on subsequent choices while the lost-shift score serves as a measure of the impact of negative feedback on subsequent choices.
Cognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingBeginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)The monetary choice questionnaire for hypothetical monetary rewards was used to assess delayed discounting (Kirby et al, 1999). The measure includes 27 items in which participants choose between a smaller, immediate reward (SIR) and a larger, delayed reward (LDR). There are three LDR sizes: small ($25-35), medium ($50-60) and large ($75-85). By examining the pattern of choices that participants make across the set of 27 items it is possible to calculate their delay discounting rate, termed K. The discount rate determines the steepness of the reduction in the present value of a reward with increases in the delay to the possible receipt of that reward. Thus, higher values in K represent greater discounting of the value of future rewards. With this measure K values can range between a low of 0.00016 to a high of 0.25. Higher K values have been linked to measures of impulsivity. Shown in the table are the K values observed when the future rewards were small, medium, or large.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extrapyramidal SymptomsBaseline (Week 0) and End of Study (Week 12)The Simpson Angus Scale (SAS; Simpson and Angus, 1970) was used to assess extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The assessment consists of 11 items, each rating the severity of potential symptoms of movement disorders. Total scores are calculated by summing the scores of each of the 11 items for a potential total score of 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe EPS.
Number of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsEvery week for 12 weeksThe Side Effect Checklist (SEC) was used to assess side effects. The SEC is comprised of 22 common side effects, which are rated on a 1 (none)-4 (severe) scale. Side effects are determined to be clinically significant if there is a two or more point increase in severity from baseline, or any side effect that receives a severity rating of 4 (severe) at any point in the treatment phase of the study.
Number of Participants With AkathisiaBaseline and every two weeks throughout the double-blind phase of the study, for up to 12 weeks.The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS; Barnes, 1989) was used to assess akathisia, a type of extrapyramidal symptom. The global clinical assessment of akathisia score is rated on a scale from 0=Absent to 5=Severe Akathisia.
Change in Persistent Positive SymptomsEvery 4 weeks for 12 weeks.The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptom item total score was used to assess positive symptom change. The BPRS positive symptom items are: conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, unusual thought content, and suspiciousness. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each item. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28. A higher score indicates a more severe positive symptom rating.
Depressive SymptomsEvery 4 weeks for 12 weeks.The Calgary Depression Scale (CDS; Addington et al, 1997) total score was used to assess depressive symptoms over the course of the study. Total scores were calculated by summing the scores of each of the 9 items. Total scores can range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Global Change in Illness SeverityEvery 4 weeks for 12 weeks.The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity of illness item was used to assess global changes. Scores on this item range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited between May 2007-October 2011 from mental health clinics throughout the community.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were excluded before assignment to treatment groups if they met any of the exclusion criteria, if they became clinically unstable, or they decided that the demands of the study were too great. 84 participants were enrolled into active participation; 57 started study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rasagiline
Treatment with Rasagiline
28
Inactive Pill
Treatment with Placebo
29
Total57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInactive PillRasagilineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants28 Participants57 Participants
Age, Continuous45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
46.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants28 participants57 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants24 Participants46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 283 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 280 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Negative Symptoms

The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) rating scale was used to assess the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores on the subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score. There are a total of 17 subscales. Each subscale ranges from 0=Not at all to 5=Severe. Every 4 weeks the summed subscale scores provide a total score for that week (0-85). Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms.

Time frame: Every 4 weeks over a 12 week period

Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 032.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
RasagilineChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 431.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
RasagilineChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 831.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
RasagilineChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 1229.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Inactive PillChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 1234.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Inactive PillChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 033.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Inactive PillChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 834.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Inactive PillChange in Negative SymptomsWeek 432.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Primary

Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting

The monetary choice questionnaire for hypothetical monetary rewards was used to assess delayed discounting (Kirby et al, 1999). The measure includes 27 items in which participants choose between a smaller, immediate reward (SIR) and a larger, delayed reward (LDR). There are three LDR sizes: small ($25-35), medium ($50-60) and large ($75-85). By examining the pattern of choices that participants make across the set of 27 items it is possible to calculate their delay discounting rate, termed K. The discount rate determines the steepness of the reduction in the present value of a reward with increases in the delay to the possible receipt of that reward. Thus, higher values in K represent greater discounting of the value of future rewards. With this measure K values can range between a low of 0.00016 to a high of 0.25. Higher K values have been linked to measures of impulsivity. Shown in the table are the K values observed when the future rewards were small, medium, or large.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)

Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingMedium Reward: Week 00.003 units on a scale
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingLarge Reward: Week 120.010 units on a scale
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingMedium Reward: Week 120.008 units on a scale
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingSmall Reward: Week 00.009 units on a scale
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingSmall Reward: Week 120.016 units on a scale
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingLarge Reward: Week 00.004 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingSmall Reward: Week 120.014 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingSmall Reward: Week 00.023 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingLarge Reward: Week 120.010 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingMedium Reward: Week 00.024 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingLarge Reward: Week 00.018 units on a scale
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Delayed DiscountingMedium Reward: Week 120.011 units on a scale
Primary

Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task

The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)

Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Week 122.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Change0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Change0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Week 123.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Week 01.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Week 02.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Week 121.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Change-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
RasagilineCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Week 03.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Change0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Week 03.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Week 123.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task0-Back: Change0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Week 02.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Week 122.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task1-Back: Change0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Week 01.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task2-Back: Week 121.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Primary

Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task

To assess reward learning, participants used performance feedback to choose the most frequently rewarded item in each of three pairs of stimuli (one pair had reward probabilities: 80% vs 20%; one pair had reward probabilities of 70% vs 30%; one pair had the probabilities of 60% vs 40 %) (PL; Frank et al, 2004). A total of 240 trials were administered so each pair was seen 80 times. Higher scores represent more frequent choices of the optimal stimulus in each pair. The frequencies with which participants repeated an item choice that was rewarded on the previous presentation (win-stay) is also presented as a percentage. Similarly, the lose-shift score is the percentage of times that participants changed their choice for unrewarded items (lose-shift). The win-stay score serves as a measure of the impact of positive feedback on subsequent choices while the lost-shift score serves as a measure of the impact of negative feedback on subsequent choices.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)

Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points. Results for lose shifts are calculated for 24 Rasagiline and 22 Placebo participants, due to missing data created by participants who had zero losses (and hence no need to shift) during both the 3rd and 4th blocks of trials.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Week 1264.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 23.4
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Change4.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 43
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Week 1270.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 24.5
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Week 048.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 16.4
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Change-5.3 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 27.4
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Week 1250.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 16.9
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Week 069.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 22.3
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Change2.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 17.2
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Week 053.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 26.9
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Week 064.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 19.5
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Change-0.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 33.8
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Week 1262.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 20.5
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Week 1258.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 23.8
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Change-1.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 27.7
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Week 070.8 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 23.7
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Change2.3 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 21.9
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Week 069.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 25.1
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Week 1268.5 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 25.8
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task80 vs 20: Change-0.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 36.8
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Week 066.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 19.8
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Week 1265.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 18.8
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task70 vs 30: Change-0.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 25.6
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Week 057.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 24.9
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Week 1258.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 18.2
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task60 vs 40: Change0.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 29.8
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Week 056.5 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 12.9
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Week 1254.8 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 12
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskLose Shifts: Change-1.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 14.9
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Week 062.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 18.7
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning TaskWin Stays: Week 1264.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosenStandard Deviation 15.2
Primary

Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score

The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test designed to evaluate neuropsychological status of adults, ages 20-89. The 12 subtests measure attention, language, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. The raw scores from the subtests are scaled together to create index scores, and these are summed for conversion to a total scale score. Higher score equals a better outcome. The total index score range for the RBANS is 40-160.

Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)

Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreWeek 076.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreWeek 1278.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
RasagilineCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreChange1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreWeek 074.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreWeek 1275.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Inactive PillCognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total ScoreChange1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Secondary

Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptom item total score was used to assess positive symptom change. The BPRS positive symptom items are: conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, unusual thought content, and suspiciousness. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each item. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28. A higher score indicates a more severe positive symptom rating.

Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 08.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
RasagilineChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 49.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
RasagilineChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 89.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
RasagilineChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 128.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Inactive PillChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 128.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Inactive PillChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 09.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Inactive PillChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 89.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Inactive PillChange in Persistent Positive SymptomsWeek 49.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Secondary

Depressive Symptoms

The Calgary Depression Scale (CDS; Addington et al, 1997) total score was used to assess depressive symptoms over the course of the study. Total scores were calculated by summing the scores of each of the 9 items. Total scores can range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineDepressive SymptomsWeek 02.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
RasagilineDepressive SymptomsWeek 42.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
RasagilineDepressive SymptomsWeek 82.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
RasagilineDepressive SymptomsWeek 122.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Inactive PillDepressive SymptomsWeek 121.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Inactive PillDepressive SymptomsWeek 02.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Inactive PillDepressive SymptomsWeek 81.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Inactive PillDepressive SymptomsWeek 41.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Extrapyramidal Symptoms

The Simpson Angus Scale (SAS; Simpson and Angus, 1970) was used to assess extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The assessment consists of 11 items, each rating the severity of potential symptoms of movement disorders. Total scores are calculated by summing the scores of each of the 11 items for a potential total score of 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe EPS.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Study (Week 12)

Population: SAS scores were collected at baseline on 28 Rasagiline and 29 Placebo patients. End of study scores were collected on 27 Rasagiline and 27 Placebo patients, including 5 patients who withdrew before Week 12 (1 Rasagiline patient at Week 4, 1 Placebo participant each at Weeks 3 and 6, and two Placebo participants at Week 8).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineExtrapyramidal SymptomsWeek 01.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
RasagilineExtrapyramidal SymptomsWeek 120.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
RasagilineExtrapyramidal SymptomsChange-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Inactive PillExtrapyramidal SymptomsWeek 01.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Inactive PillExtrapyramidal SymptomsWeek 121.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Inactive PillExtrapyramidal SymptomsChange-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Global Change in Illness Severity

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity of illness item was used to assess global changes. Scores on this item range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill.

Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RasagilineGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 04.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
RasagilineGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 44.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
RasagilineGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 81.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
RasagilineGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 121.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Inactive PillGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 124.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Inactive PillGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 04.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Inactive PillGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 84.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Inactive PillGlobal Change in Illness SeverityWeek 44.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Secondary

Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects

The Side Effect Checklist (SEC) was used to assess side effects. The SEC is comprised of 22 common side effects, which are rated on a 1 (none)-4 (severe) scale. Side effects are determined to be clinically significant if there is a two or more point increase in severity from baseline, or any side effect that receives a severity rating of 4 (severe) at any point in the treatment phase of the study.

Time frame: Every week for 12 weeks

Population: One placebo patient for whom a baseline side effects checklist was excluded from these analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDizziness5 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsAbdominal Pain5 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsAnorexia7 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsBruising Easily4 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsConstipation12 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDiarrhea9 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsHeadache7 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDry Mouth7 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsEnuresis4 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsFever2 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsHypersalivation4 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsInsomnia2 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsMalaise8 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsMucosal Ulceration1 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsNausea6 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsRash3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsRestlessness4 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsSedation8 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsSore Throat3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsStiffness7 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsTremor3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsUrticaria3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsVomiting4 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsWeight Loss10 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsInsomnia7 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsNausea2 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsVomiting4 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsAbdominal Pain7 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsMalaise14 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsAnorexia10 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsSore Throat5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsBruising Easily1 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsMucosal Ulceration1 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsConstipation9 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsUrticaria5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDiarrhea6 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsStiffness5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDizziness7 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsRash5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsDry Mouth11 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsWeight Loss12 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsEnuresis3 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsRestlessness7 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsFever5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsHeadache8 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsTremor11 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsHypersalivation7 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants Exhibiting Side EffectsSedation8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Akathisia

The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS; Barnes, 1989) was used to assess akathisia, a type of extrapyramidal symptom. The global clinical assessment of akathisia score is rated on a scale from 0=Absent to 5=Severe Akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline and every two weeks throughout the double-blind phase of the study, for up to 12 weeks.

Population: Barnes Akathisia Scales at baseline and end of study were collected for 26 participants each in the rasagiline and placebo groups. End of study ratings were collected at week 12, except for 4 placebo participants (1 participant each at weeks 3 and 6, and two at week 8).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 0=Absent : Baseline20 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 2=Mild Akathisia : Baseline2 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 1=Questionable : Baseline3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 2=Mild Akathisia : End of Study3 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 0=Absent : End of Study20 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 3=Moderate Akathisia : Baseline1 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 1=Questionable : End of Study2 Participants
RasagilineNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 3=Moderate Akathisia : End of Study1 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 3=Moderate Akathisia : End of Study0 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 0=Absent : Baseline21 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 0=Absent : End of Study21 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 1=Questionable : Baseline5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 1=Questionable : End of Study5 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 2=Mild Akathisia : Baseline0 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 2=Mild Akathisia : End of Study0 Participants
Inactive PillNumber of Participants With AkathisiaScore 3=Moderate Akathisia : Baseline0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026