Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
Cognitive impairments, Negative symptoms
Brief summary
This is a study of a new medication for the treatment of cognitive impairments (thinking difficulties) and negative symptoms in people with schizophrenia. The new medication is rasagiline. Rasagiline is a drug which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. It is used to treat cognitive problems.
Detailed description
The study will consist of two phases: a 4-week continued stability phase (lead-in phase) and a 12-week double-blind treatment phase. In the lead-in phase, subjects receiving antipsychotic medication, who manifest moderate to severe and persistent negative symptoms, will remain on their maintenance regimen for at least four weeks. The treatment phase will be a 12-week, parallel groups, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive rasagiline (1 mg/day), a selective MAO-B oxidase inhibitor.
Interventions
Rasagiline 1 mg/day for 12 weeks
Placebo 1 tablet each day
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. * Current treatment with one or more second generation antipsychotics, except ziprasidone * On same second generation antipsychotic(s)for at least 56 days * On same dose of second generation antipsychotic(s)for at least 30 days * 22-item SANS: Total score (i.e.all items minus global items and poverty of content of speech)greater than 20 or global Rating of Affective Flattening greater than or equal to 3 or global Rating of alogia greater than or equal to 3 * BPRS: Sum of the four positive symptom items less than or equal to 16 (items 4,11,12,15) * BPRS: Sum of the four Anxiety/Depression Factor items less than or equal to 14 (items 1,2,5,9) * Simpson-Angus Scale: Total score less than or equal to 8
Exclusion criteria
* DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder within last 6 months * Current treatment with ziprasidone * DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence within the last 6 months * DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or substance abuse within the last month * evidence of illicit substance use, as identified with urine toxicology screen * History of an organic brain disorder, mental retardation,epilepsy, or a medical condition, whose pathology or treatment could alter the presentation or treatment of schizophrenia or significantly increase the risk associated with the proposed treatment protocol. See those listed below * Uncontrolled hypertension defined as BP exceeding 145/90 on 3 consecutive readings despite adequate treatment, pheochromocytoma, melanoma, hepatic insufficiency * Pregnancy or lactation in females * Pheochromocytoma * Melanoma * Hepatic insufficiency
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Negative Symptoms | Every 4 weeks over a 12 week period | The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) rating scale was used to assess the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores on the subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score. There are a total of 17 subscales. Each subscale ranges from 0=Not at all to 5=Severe. Every 4 weeks the summed subscale scores provide a total score for that week (0-85). Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms. |
| Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12) | The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test designed to evaluate neuropsychological status of adults, ages 20-89. The 12 subtests measure attention, language, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. The raw scores from the subtests are scaled together to create index scores, and these are summed for conversion to a total scale score. Higher score equals a better outcome. The total index score range for the RBANS is 40-160. |
| Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12) | The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower. |
| Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12) | To assess reward learning, participants used performance feedback to choose the most frequently rewarded item in each of three pairs of stimuli (one pair had reward probabilities: 80% vs 20%; one pair had reward probabilities of 70% vs 30%; one pair had the probabilities of 60% vs 40 %) (PL; Frank et al, 2004). A total of 240 trials were administered so each pair was seen 80 times. Higher scores represent more frequent choices of the optimal stimulus in each pair. The frequencies with which participants repeated an item choice that was rewarded on the previous presentation (win-stay) is also presented as a percentage. Similarly, the lose-shift score is the percentage of times that participants changed their choice for unrewarded items (lose-shift). The win-stay score serves as a measure of the impact of positive feedback on subsequent choices while the lost-shift score serves as a measure of the impact of negative feedback on subsequent choices. |
| Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12) | The monetary choice questionnaire for hypothetical monetary rewards was used to assess delayed discounting (Kirby et al, 1999). The measure includes 27 items in which participants choose between a smaller, immediate reward (SIR) and a larger, delayed reward (LDR). There are three LDR sizes: small ($25-35), medium ($50-60) and large ($75-85). By examining the pattern of choices that participants make across the set of 27 items it is possible to calculate their delay discounting rate, termed K. The discount rate determines the steepness of the reduction in the present value of a reward with increases in the delay to the possible receipt of that reward. Thus, higher values in K represent greater discounting of the value of future rewards. With this measure K values can range between a low of 0.00016 to a high of 0.25. Higher K values have been linked to measures of impulsivity. Shown in the table are the K values observed when the future rewards were small, medium, or large. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Baseline (Week 0) and End of Study (Week 12) | The Simpson Angus Scale (SAS; Simpson and Angus, 1970) was used to assess extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The assessment consists of 11 items, each rating the severity of potential symptoms of movement disorders. Total scores are calculated by summing the scores of each of the 11 items for a potential total score of 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe EPS. |
| Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Every week for 12 weeks | The Side Effect Checklist (SEC) was used to assess side effects. The SEC is comprised of 22 common side effects, which are rated on a 1 (none)-4 (severe) scale. Side effects are determined to be clinically significant if there is a two or more point increase in severity from baseline, or any side effect that receives a severity rating of 4 (severe) at any point in the treatment phase of the study. |
| Number of Participants With Akathisia | Baseline and every two weeks throughout the double-blind phase of the study, for up to 12 weeks. | The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS; Barnes, 1989) was used to assess akathisia, a type of extrapyramidal symptom. The global clinical assessment of akathisia score is rated on a scale from 0=Absent to 5=Severe Akathisia. |
| Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. | The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptom item total score was used to assess positive symptom change. The BPRS positive symptom items are: conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, unusual thought content, and suspiciousness. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each item. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28. A higher score indicates a more severe positive symptom rating. |
| Depressive Symptoms | Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. | The Calgary Depression Scale (CDS; Addington et al, 1997) total score was used to assess depressive symptoms over the course of the study. Total scores were calculated by summing the scores of each of the 9 items. Total scores can range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. |
| Global Change in Illness Severity | Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity of illness item was used to assess global changes. Scores on this item range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited between May 2007-October 2011 from mental health clinics throughout the community.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were excluded before assignment to treatment groups if they met any of the exclusion criteria, if they became clinically unstable, or they decided that the demands of the study were too great. 84 participants were enrolled into active participation; 57 started study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rasagiline Treatment with Rasagiline | 28 |
| Inactive Pill Treatment with Placebo | 29 |
| Total | 57 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Inactive Pill | Rasagiline | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 29 Participants | 28 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 45.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 | 46.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 46.09 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 29 participants | 28 participants | 57 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 22 Participants | 24 Participants | 46 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 28 | 0 / 29 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 28 | 3 / 29 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 28 | 0 / 29 |
Outcome results
Change in Negative Symptoms
The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) rating scale was used to assess the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores on the subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score. There are a total of 17 subscales. Each subscale ranges from 0=Not at all to 5=Severe. Every 4 weeks the summed subscale scores provide a total score for that week (0-85). Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks over a 12 week period
Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 0 | 32.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 4 | 31.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 8 | 31.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 12 | 29.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 12 | 34.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 0 | 33.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 8 | 34.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Negative Symptoms | Week 4 | 32.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting
The monetary choice questionnaire for hypothetical monetary rewards was used to assess delayed discounting (Kirby et al, 1999). The measure includes 27 items in which participants choose between a smaller, immediate reward (SIR) and a larger, delayed reward (LDR). There are three LDR sizes: small ($25-35), medium ($50-60) and large ($75-85). By examining the pattern of choices that participants make across the set of 27 items it is possible to calculate their delay discounting rate, termed K. The discount rate determines the steepness of the reduction in the present value of a reward with increases in the delay to the possible receipt of that reward. Thus, higher values in K represent greater discounting of the value of future rewards. With this measure K values can range between a low of 0.00016 to a high of 0.25. Higher K values have been linked to measures of impulsivity. Shown in the table are the K values observed when the future rewards were small, medium, or large.
Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)
Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Medium Reward: Week 0 | 0.003 units on a scale |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Large Reward: Week 12 | 0.010 units on a scale |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Medium Reward: Week 12 | 0.008 units on a scale |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Small Reward: Week 0 | 0.009 units on a scale |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Small Reward: Week 12 | 0.016 units on a scale |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Large Reward: Week 0 | 0.004 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Small Reward: Week 12 | 0.014 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Small Reward: Week 0 | 0.023 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Large Reward: Week 12 | 0.010 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Medium Reward: Week 0 | 0.024 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Large Reward: Week 0 | 0.018 units on a scale |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Delayed Discounting | Medium Reward: Week 12 | 0.011 units on a scale |
Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task
The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.
Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)
Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Week 12 | 2.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Change | 0.32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Change | 0.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Week 12 | 3.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Week 0 | 1.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Week 0 | 2.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Week 12 | 1.59 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Change | -0.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Week 0 | 3.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Change | 0.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Week 0 | 3.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Week 12 | 3.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 0-Back: Change | 0.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Week 0 | 2.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Week 12 | 2.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 1-Back: Change | 0.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Week 0 | 1.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - N-Back Neurocognitive Task | 2-Back: Week 12 | 1.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task
To assess reward learning, participants used performance feedback to choose the most frequently rewarded item in each of three pairs of stimuli (one pair had reward probabilities: 80% vs 20%; one pair had reward probabilities of 70% vs 30%; one pair had the probabilities of 60% vs 40 %) (PL; Frank et al, 2004). A total of 240 trials were administered so each pair was seen 80 times. Higher scores represent more frequent choices of the optimal stimulus in each pair. The frequencies with which participants repeated an item choice that was rewarded on the previous presentation (win-stay) is also presented as a percentage. Similarly, the lose-shift score is the percentage of times that participants changed their choice for unrewarded items (lose-shift). The win-stay score serves as a measure of the impact of positive feedback on subsequent choices while the lost-shift score serves as a measure of the impact of negative feedback on subsequent choices.
Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)
Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points. Results for lose shifts are calculated for 24 Rasagiline and 22 Placebo participants, due to missing data created by participants who had zero losses (and hence no need to shift) during both the 3rd and 4th blocks of trials.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Week 12 | 64.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 23.4 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Change | 4.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 43 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Week 12 | 70.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Week 0 | 48.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Change | -5.3 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Week 12 | 50.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Week 0 | 69.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Change | 2.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Week 0 | 53.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 26.9 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Week 0 | 64.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Change | -0.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 33.8 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Week 12 | 62.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Week 12 | 58.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Change | -1.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Week 0 | 70.8 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Change | 2.3 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Week 0 | 69.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Week 12 | 68.5 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 80 vs 20: Change | -0.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 36.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Week 0 | 66.1 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Week 12 | 65.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 70 vs 30: Change | -0.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Week 0 | 57.9 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Week 12 | 58.6 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | 60 vs 40: Change | 0.7 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Week 0 | 56.5 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Week 12 | 54.8 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Lose Shifts: Change | -1.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Week 0 | 62.2 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Probabilistic Learning Task | Win Stays: Week 12 | 64.4 percentage of optimal stimuli chosen | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score
The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test designed to evaluate neuropsychological status of adults, ages 20-89. The 12 subtests measure attention, language, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. The raw scores from the subtests are scaled together to create index scores, and these are summed for conversion to a total scale score. Higher score equals a better outcome. The total index score range for the RBANS is 40-160.
Time frame: Beginning of treatment phase (week 0) and end of treatment phase (week 12)
Population: Subjects completing the cognitive testing at both time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Week 0 | 76.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Week 12 | 78.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Rasagiline | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Change | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Week 0 | 74.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Week 12 | 75.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Inactive Pill | Cognitive Testing - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score | Change | 1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptom item total score was used to assess positive symptom change. The BPRS positive symptom items are: conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, unusual thought content, and suspiciousness. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each item. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28. A higher score indicates a more severe positive symptom rating.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.
Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 0 | 8.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 4 | 9.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 8 | 9.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Rasagiline | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 12 | 8.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 12 | 8.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 0 | 9.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 8 | 9.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Inactive Pill | Change in Persistent Positive Symptoms | Week 4 | 9.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
Depressive Symptoms
The Calgary Depression Scale (CDS; Addington et al, 1997) total score was used to assess depressive symptoms over the course of the study. Total scores were calculated by summing the scores of each of the 9 items. Total scores can range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.
Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Depressive Symptoms | Week 0 | 2.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Rasagiline | Depressive Symptoms | Week 4 | 2.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Rasagiline | Depressive Symptoms | Week 8 | 2.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| Rasagiline | Depressive Symptoms | Week 12 | 2.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Inactive Pill | Depressive Symptoms | Week 12 | 1.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.25 |
| Inactive Pill | Depressive Symptoms | Week 0 | 2.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.37 |
| Inactive Pill | Depressive Symptoms | Week 8 | 1.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.94 |
| Inactive Pill | Depressive Symptoms | Week 4 | 1.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Extrapyramidal Symptoms
The Simpson Angus Scale (SAS; Simpson and Angus, 1970) was used to assess extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The assessment consists of 11 items, each rating the severity of potential symptoms of movement disorders. Total scores are calculated by summing the scores of each of the 11 items for a potential total score of 0-44, with higher scores indicating more severe EPS.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Study (Week 12)
Population: SAS scores were collected at baseline on 28 Rasagiline and 29 Placebo patients. End of study scores were collected on 27 Rasagiline and 27 Placebo patients, including 5 patients who withdrew before Week 12 (1 Rasagiline patient at Week 4, 1 Placebo participant each at Weeks 3 and 6, and two Placebo participants at Week 8).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Week 0 | 1.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Rasagiline | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Week 12 | 0.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
| Rasagiline | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Change | -0.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.94 |
| Inactive Pill | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Week 0 | 1.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Inactive Pill | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Week 12 | 1.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Inactive Pill | Extrapyramidal Symptoms | Change | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
Global Change in Illness Severity
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity of illness item was used to assess global changes. Scores on this item range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.
Population: Number of participants available for symptom efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 0 | 4.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Rasagiline | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 4 | 4.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Rasagiline | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 8 | 1.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Rasagiline | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 12 | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Inactive Pill | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 12 | 4.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Inactive Pill | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 0 | 4.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Inactive Pill | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 8 | 4.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Inactive Pill | Global Change in Illness Severity | Week 4 | 4.32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects
The Side Effect Checklist (SEC) was used to assess side effects. The SEC is comprised of 22 common side effects, which are rated on a 1 (none)-4 (severe) scale. Side effects are determined to be clinically significant if there is a two or more point increase in severity from baseline, or any side effect that receives a severity rating of 4 (severe) at any point in the treatment phase of the study.
Time frame: Every week for 12 weeks
Population: One placebo patient for whom a baseline side effects checklist was excluded from these analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Dizziness | 5 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Abdominal Pain | 5 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Anorexia | 7 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Bruising Easily | 4 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Constipation | 12 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Diarrhea | 9 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Headache | 7 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Dry Mouth | 7 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Enuresis | 4 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Fever | 2 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Hypersalivation | 4 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Insomnia | 2 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Malaise | 8 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Mucosal Ulceration | 1 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Nausea | 6 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Rash | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Restlessness | 4 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Sedation | 8 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Sore Throat | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Stiffness | 7 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Tremor | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Urticaria | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Vomiting | 4 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Weight Loss | 10 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Insomnia | 7 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Nausea | 2 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Vomiting | 4 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Abdominal Pain | 7 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Malaise | 14 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Anorexia | 10 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Sore Throat | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Bruising Easily | 1 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Mucosal Ulceration | 1 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Constipation | 9 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Urticaria | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Diarrhea | 6 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Stiffness | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Dizziness | 7 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Rash | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Dry Mouth | 11 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Weight Loss | 12 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Enuresis | 3 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Restlessness | 7 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Fever | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Headache | 8 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Tremor | 11 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Hypersalivation | 7 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants Exhibiting Side Effects | Sedation | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With Akathisia
The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS; Barnes, 1989) was used to assess akathisia, a type of extrapyramidal symptom. The global clinical assessment of akathisia score is rated on a scale from 0=Absent to 5=Severe Akathisia.
Time frame: Baseline and every two weeks throughout the double-blind phase of the study, for up to 12 weeks.
Population: Barnes Akathisia Scales at baseline and end of study were collected for 26 participants each in the rasagiline and placebo groups. End of study ratings were collected at week 12, except for 4 placebo participants (1 participant each at weeks 3 and 6, and two at week 8).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 0=Absent : Baseline | 20 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 2=Mild Akathisia : Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 1=Questionable : Baseline | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 2=Mild Akathisia : End of Study | 3 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 0=Absent : End of Study | 20 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 3=Moderate Akathisia : Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 1=Questionable : End of Study | 2 Participants |
| Rasagiline | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 3=Moderate Akathisia : End of Study | 1 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 3=Moderate Akathisia : End of Study | 0 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 0=Absent : Baseline | 21 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 0=Absent : End of Study | 21 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 1=Questionable : Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 1=Questionable : End of Study | 5 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 2=Mild Akathisia : Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 2=Mild Akathisia : End of Study | 0 Participants |
| Inactive Pill | Number of Participants With Akathisia | Score 3=Moderate Akathisia : Baseline | 0 Participants |