Skip to content

A Phase II, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma

A Phase II, Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAY 43-9006 Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00492297
Enrollment
83
Registered
2007-06-27
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2014-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether a new type of anti-cancer drug, known as BAY 43-9006, can be given safely and with good effect in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC). DTIC is the current standard chemotherapy drug given for melanoma that has spread through the body. Although this drug can be effective on its own and is generally well tolerated, not all patients will benefit, so there is a need to test new drugs and drug combinations for treating melanoma.

Detailed description

Issues on Safety outcomes are addressed in the Adverse Event section.

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)

Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m\^2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid)

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with advanced, metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma, for whom treatment with dacarbazine is considered medically acceptable * Age \>= 18 years * Subject has measurable and evaluable disease defined as at least one metastatic lesion that can be accurately and serially measured by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Cutaneous lesions measuring at least 20mm in longest diameter can be considered measurable (and therefore target lesions) via color photography including a ruler * Subject has biopsiable disease at baseline and is willing to provide biopsy samples, or does not have biopsiable disease at baseline * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1

Exclusion criteria

* Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma (cutaneous vulval melanoma is permitted) * Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors \[Ta, Tis & T1\] or any cancer curatively treated \> 3 years prior to study entry * (Active coronary artery disease or ischemia (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed) * Uncontrolled hypertension (\> grade 2 National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0) * Active, clinically serious infections (\> grade 2 NCI-CTCAE version 3.0) * Subjects with seizure disorder requiring medication are excluded * History of or suspected Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, or chronic hepatitis B or C * Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the subject is \> 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks prior to study entry and is clinically stable with respect to the tumor at the time of study entry. Also the subject must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies) * Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Best Responseduring or within 30 days after active therapyBest Overall Response (BOR): Best tumor response achieved during or within 30 days after active therapy confirmed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR): The disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survivalfrom start of treatment until progression or death before progression (median 259 days)Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-pointsfrom start of treatment until progression or death before progression after 3, 6 and 12 monthsProgression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
Overall Survivalfrom start of treatment until death (median 259 days)Overall Survival was the number of days from the date that combination treatment started until the date of death.
Duration of Responsefrom confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) until Progressive Disease (PD) (median 259 days)Duration of Response was assessed in subjects who showed a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR). It was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to Progressive Disease (PD), or death if before documented progression. Duration of response for subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Duration of Complete Responsefrom confirmed CR until PD (median 259 days)Duration of complete response was the number of days from the date that a complete response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).
Duration of Partial Responsefrom confirmed PR until PD (median 259 days)Duration of partial response was the number of days from the date that a partial response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).
Disease Control (DC)after start of treatment, at 6 months and 12 monthsDC was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not progressive disease (PD) (total number of CRs + total number of PRs + total number of Stable Diseases (SD)). The DC at specific time points could also be calculated as the total number of subjects whose response was not PD at that time point.
Duration of Stable Diseasefrom start of therapy to PD, only in non-responders (median 259 days)Duration of Stable Disease (DSD), defined as the time from the first documented objective evidence of Stable Disease (SD) to disease progression (DP) or death if death occurred before DP, was assessed in subjects who showed SD as best response. DSD for subjects who had not progressed or died was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Time to Responsestart of therapy to confirmed CR or PR (median 259 days)Time to Response in subjects who achieved an objective response (PR or CR with confirmation) was measured from the date of starting study combination treatment until the earliest date that the response was first documented.
Time to ProgressionFrom start of treatment until progression (median 259 days)Time to Progression was the number of days from the start of therapy to progression (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to the last observation at which the patient was known to have not progressed, that is, the last observation with a best response of CR, PR, or SD.

Countries

France, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study had a 2-stage Simon optimal design consisting of 30 subjects in the first stage and 52 subjects in the second stage for a planned total of 82 subjects. Actually a total of 96 subjects were enrolled and 83 were treated; 32 in the 1st stage and 51 in the second stage. The study was conducted at 8 centers in the UK and 4 centers in France.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 96 enrolled subjects, 13 were screening failures. The reasons for screening failure were violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria (12) and death due to Progressive Disease (PD) (1). The remaining 83 subjects all received at least one dose of sorafenib and dacarbazine.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine
Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid)
83
Total83

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Active Follow-up 30(+4) Days DurationDeath17
Active Follow-up 30(+4) Days DurationStudy terminated by sponsor2
Survival Only Follow-upDeath46
Survival Only Follow-upLack of Efficacy1
Survival Only Follow-upStudy terminated by sponsor12
TreatmentDeath2
TreatmentStudy terminated by sponsor3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSorafenib + Dacarbazine
Age, Continuous53.5 years
Clinical disease status
Missing
6 participants
Clinical disease status
Progressive disease
74 participants
Clinical disease status
Stable disease
3 participants
Disease stage (AJCC)
M1a Distant subcutaneous or lymphnode metastases
4 participants
Disease stage (AJCC)
M1b Lung metastases
12 participants
Disease stage (AJCC)
M1c All other visceral metastases
66 participants
Disease stage (AJCC)
Missing
1 participants
ECOG status
0
52 participants
ECOG status
1
28 participants
ECOG status
Missing
3 participants
Histology
Acral lentiginous
2 participants
Histology
Malignant melanoma
4 participants
Histology
Missing
24 participants
Histology
Nodular
29 participants
Histology
Superfical spreading
24 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase
>= 10 percent above the ULN
26 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase
Missing
3 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase
>= ULN but < 10 percent above ULN
11 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase
< Upper Limit of Normal (ULN=325 U/L)
43 participants
Mean time from diagnosis1280 days
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 83
serious
Total, serious adverse events
40 / 83

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Best Response

Best Overall Response (BOR): Best tumor response achieved during or within 30 days after active therapy confirmed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR): The disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: during or within 30 days after active therapy

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Of these, 75 were evaluable for Best Response; 8 were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Best ResponseOverall response (CR+PR)10 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Best ResponseComplete response (CR)1 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Best ResponsePartial response (PR)9 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Best ResponseStable disease (SD)31 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Best ResponseProgressive disease (PD)34 participants
Secondary

Disease Control (DC)

DC was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not progressive disease (PD) (total number of CRs + total number of PRs + total number of Stable Diseases (SD)). The DC at specific time points could also be calculated as the total number of subjects whose response was not PD at that time point.

Time frame: after start of treatment, at 6 months and 12 months

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. All 83 were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDisease Control (DC)DC at 6 months38 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDisease Control (DC)DC based on overall best response41 participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDisease Control (DC)DC at 12 months38 participants
Secondary

Duration of Complete Response

Duration of complete response was the number of days from the date that a complete response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).

Time frame: from confirmed CR until PD (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Only the 1 subject who had a CR was included in this analysis (duration 420 days, censored).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDuration of Complete Response420 days
Secondary

Duration of Partial Response

Duration of partial response was the number of days from the date that a partial response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).

Time frame: from confirmed PR until PD (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Only the 9 subjects who had a PR were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDuration of Partial Response255 days
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of Response was assessed in subjects who showed a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR). It was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to Progressive Disease (PD), or death if before documented progression. Duration of response for subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.

Time frame: from confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) until Progressive Disease (PD) (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Only the 10 subjects who had a PR or CR were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDuration of Response327 days
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease

Duration of Stable Disease (DSD), defined as the time from the first documented objective evidence of Stable Disease (SD) to disease progression (DP) or death if death occurred before DP, was assessed in subjects who showed SD as best response. DSD for subjects who had not progressed or died was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.

Time frame: from start of therapy to PD, only in non-responders (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Only the 70 subjects who had a Best Response of Stable Disease, ie, those who failed to achieve a Best Response of CR or PR, were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineDuration of Stable Disease93 days
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival was the number of days from the date that combination treatment started until the date of death.

Time frame: from start of treatment until death (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. All 83 were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineOverall Survival259 days
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-points

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.

Time frame: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression after 3, 6 and 12 months

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. All 83 were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib + DacarbazinePercentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-pointsPFS at month 356.63 percentage of participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazinePercentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-pointsPFS at month 633.73 percentage of participants
Sorafenib + DacarbazinePercentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-pointsPFS at month 1210.84 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.

Time frame: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. All 83 were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineProgression-free Survival102 days
Secondary

Time to Progression

Time to Progression was the number of days from the start of therapy to progression (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to the last observation at which the patient was known to have not progressed, that is, the last observation with a best response of CR, PR, or SD.

Time frame: From start of treatment until progression (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Of these 83, 78 were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineTime to Progression102 days
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to Response in subjects who achieved an objective response (PR or CR with confirmation) was measured from the date of starting study combination treatment until the earliest date that the response was first documented.

Time frame: start of therapy to confirmed CR or PR (median 259 days)

Population: There were 83 subjects in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Only the 10 subjects who had a PR or CR were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib + DacarbazineTime to Response48 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026