Skip to content

Open-Label Extension Study Of Rosiglitazone XR As Adjunctive Therapy In Subjects With Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimers

An Open-label Extension to Study AVA102670 and AVA102672, to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) as Adjunctive Therapy on Cognition in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00490568
Enrollment
1461
Registered
2007-06-22
Start date
2007-08-08
Completion date
2009-06-01
Last updated
2017-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

cognition, Alzheimer's disease, Rosiglitazone extended-release (XR), safety, adjunctive therapy, BRL-049653, tolerability, open-label extension

Brief summary

This is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label extension, single-group study in male and female outpatients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who have completed either AVA102670 or AVA102672. All subjects will receive rosiglitazone extended-release (RSG XR) 4mg once daily for the first 4 weeks of the study followed by 8mg RSG XR as adjunctive therapy to their existing dose of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Subject participation will last until one of 5 conditions applies. After a 52-week open-label treatment phase, subjects will attend a final Follow-Up Visit 6 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of RSG XR in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD who have completed either AVA102670 or AVA102672. The secondary objective of this study is to explore further the long-term efficacy of RSG XR in terms of cognitive function and overall clinical response as a function of apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 allele status.

Interventions

Experimental drug

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
51 Years to 91 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Successful completion of AVA102670 or AVA102672 without safety or tolerability issues. Regular caregiver.

Exclusion criteria

* Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA 1-4), clinically significant peripheral edema, other neurological conditions that might disqualify participation. SAE, clinically significant laboratory abnormality or significant cardiovascular event during prior study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEsUp to 76 WeeksAn AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The severity of the AE'S was categorized as mild, moderate and severe. Number of participants reporting AEs during the on treatment phase of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaUp to 76 WeeksOedema was considered as adverse event of special interest (AESI). The process for AESI selection was based on RSG's pharmacologic class and relevant AEs potentially associated with RSG. The number of participants and their percentage for the adverse event of the various types of oedema were reported.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)Vital signs SBP and DBP were measured at each visit. All measurements were made on the participant non-dominant arm supported at heart level, using the same cuff size and same equipment. Blood pressure was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). If the participant was a smoker or used tobacco products, a period of 30 minutes without tobacco was allowed before taking these measurements. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)Vital sign HR was measured at each visit. HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)BW was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the body weight at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesUp to 82 Weeks (including follow up)The clinical chemistry data included non-fasting measures of lipid metabolism (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the lipids (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides) value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)The frequency of participant vital sign sitting blood pressure was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) for SBP 90-140 mmHg, DBP 50-90 mmHg or have a change from Baseline of PCC for SBP increase from Baseline (IFB) \>=40, decrease from Baseline (DFB) \>= 30 for and for DBP (IFB) \>= 30 ,DFB \>= 20. The number of participants with values of PCC at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow up were reported.
Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTUp to 70 Weeks (including follow up)HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. The frequency of participant vital sign heart rate was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) 50-100 bpm or have a change from Baseline of PCC IFB \>=30 and DFB \>=30. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.
Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and DeathsUp to 76 WeeksA SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening condition, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Number of participants with SAEs and deaths were reported for treatment duration of the study.
Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTUp to Week 82 (including follow up)The hematology data included eosinophils, haematocrit, haemoglobin, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes, platelet count, red cell distribution width (RDW), red blood cell (RBC) count, segmented neutrophils (SN), total neutrophils (TN), white blood cell (WBC) count. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTUp to Week 82 (including follow up)The clinical chemistry data included alanine amino transferase (ALT), albumin, aldolase, asparatate amino transferase (AST), BUN/creatinine ratio, carbon dioxide(CO2) content, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin (DB), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C), HDL, LDL, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), magnesium, potassium, sodium, total bilirubin (TB), triglycerides, troponin I, urea. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores ranged from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52The CDR-SB is a validated clinical assessment of global function in par. with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or box scores, were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranged from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52The MMSE consisted of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores ranged from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52DAD, assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participant's ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) \* 100. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 5212-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, motor disturbance, appetite, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions=participant has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) on a 4-point scale, their severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) on a 3-point scale, and the distress on a 5-point scale. Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOTUp to 70 Weeks (including follow up)The frequency of participant vital sign weight was obtained to check if the values have CFB of PCC IFB \>=7 percent. With the exception of Week 4, when participants were first titrated to the 8mg RSG XR dose, at every time point in the study where weight was measured the percentage of participants experienced an increase in BW of PCC was approximately 2 times greater than the percentage of participants experiencing an decrease in BW of PCC DFB \>=7 percent. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A open-label extension study to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of rosiglitazone extended-release (RSG XR) tablets in participants with mild-to moderate Alzheimer's Disease conducted in a total of 29 countries across 267 centers from 08 August 2007 to 30 May 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Approximately 1800 participants were planned to be enrolled however a total of 1461 participants (after completing parent studies AVA102670/AVA102672) were enrolled and received open-label RSG-XR tablets.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RSG XR (AVA102675)
Eligible participants who completed studies AVA102670 or AVA102672 entered in this open-label extension study. Participants received open-label RSG XR throughout the treatment period as adjunctive therapy to their existing dose of AChEI for Alzheimer's disease treatment. Participants took one tablet of study medication daily in the morning with or without food. All participants received 4 mg once daily RSG XR for the first 4 weeks of the study (only for the first 4 weeks of the study). The RSG XR dose was then increased to 8 mg once daily from Week 4 through Week 52. The dose of RSG XR was reduced to 2mg once daily if the 8 mg dose was not well tolerated. Participants were not permitted to titrate back to 8 mg RSG XR.
1,461
Total1,461

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAbnormal ECG25
Overall StudyAdverse Event116
Overall StudyCaregiver related20
Overall StudyDisease progression4
Overall StudyEfficacy related3
Overall StudyExclusion criteria met1
Overall StudyInvestigator decision3
Overall StudyLegal representative withdrew consent1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyNon-Compliance7
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyParticipant died1
Overall StudyParticipant refused follow-up9
Overall StudyParticipant withdrawal due to surgery1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation45
Overall StudyStill in the study at termination974
Overall StudyUnmet inclusion-exclusion criteria5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject135

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRSG XR (AVA102675)
Age, Continuous73.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1396 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
843 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
618 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 1,461
other
Total, other adverse events
130 / 1,461
serious
Total, serious adverse events
126 / 1,461

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The severity of the AE'S was categorized as mild, moderate and severe. Number of participants reporting AEs during the on treatment phase of the study.

Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks

Population: All Subjects (Full population), comprised of all participants who took at least one dose of open-label study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEsAny AE724 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEsMild AE345 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEsModerate AE289 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEsSevere AE88 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores ranged from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negative, positive, homozygotes, heterozygotes).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 24 (Full population)2.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 52 (Full population)5.1 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 6.82
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 negatives)2.3 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 5.28
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 negatives)4.8 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 positives)2.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 5.66
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 52(APOE4 positives)5.4 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)2.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 5.77
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)5.2 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 7.49
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)2.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)5.4 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 7.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.

The CDR-SB is a validated clinical assessment of global function in par. with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or box scores, were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranged from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52

Population: All subject population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (Full population)0.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (Full population)1.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 negatives)0.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 negatives)1.3 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 positives)0.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 positives)1.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)0.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)1.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)0.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)1.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.

DAD, assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participant's ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) \* 100. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (Full population)-5.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 12.36
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (Full population)-10.8 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15.07
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 negatives)-4.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 11.57
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 negatives)-10.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 positives)-6.2 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 12.88
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 positives)-10.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15.26
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)-5.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 12.16
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)-12.6 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 11.84
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)-6.4 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 13.08
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)-10.1 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 16.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.

The MMSE consisted of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores ranged from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (Full population)-1.2 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (Full population)-2.3 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 negatives)-0.7 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 negatives)-1.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 positives)-1.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 positives)-2.8 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.17
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)-1.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)-2.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)-1.5 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)-2.9 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.

12-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, motor disturbance, appetite, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions=participant has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) on a 4-point scale, their severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) on a 3-point scale, and the distress on a 5-point scale. Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (Full population)1.4 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (Full population)3.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 negatives)1.0 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 negatives)2.4 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 positives)1.7 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.29
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 positives)3.8 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.71
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)1.8 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 7.75
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes)4.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 14.19
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)1.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.45
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes)3.7 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides

The clinical chemistry data included non-fasting measures of lipid metabolism (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the lipids (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides) value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Up to 82 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at Week 40.076 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.6828
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at Week 160.201 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8666
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at Week 360.246 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.9649
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at Week 520.174 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 1.1437
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at Week 76-0.715 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.3041
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTC at follow up0.093 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.9377
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at Week 40.007 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.2008
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at Week 16-0.014 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.2427
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at Week 36-0.026 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.2487
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at Week 52-0.035 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.2512
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at Week 760.050 millimole per litre (mmol/l)
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesHDL at follow up-0.058 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.2605
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at Week 40.062 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.6207
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at Week 160.210 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.7782
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at Week 360.281 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8863
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at Week 520.228 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 1.0563
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at Week 76-0.200 millimole per litre (mmol/l)
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesLDL at follow up0.148 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8336
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at Week 40.004 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.7845
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at Week 16-0.025 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8053
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at Week 36-0.062 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8053
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at Week 52-0.092 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8521
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at Week 76-0.150 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.9758
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), TriglyceridesTriglycerides at follow up-0.035 millimole per litre (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 0.8295
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)

BW was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the body weight at specified visit minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 160.7 kgStandard Deviation 3.53
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 240.6 kgStandard Deviation 2.95
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 40.3 kgStandard Deviation 2.04
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 80.6 kgStandard Deviation 2.45
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 120.6 kgStandard Deviation 2.43
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 361.0 kgStandard Deviation 4.08
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 521.2 kgStandard Deviation 3.82
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Week 641.4 kgStandard Deviation 2.52
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)BW at Follow-up0.5 kgStandard Deviation 3.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)

Vital sign HR was measured at each visit. HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 41.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 8.95
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 81.8 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.6
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 121.6 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.77
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 161.6 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.66
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 240.9 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.99
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 361.3 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.86
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 520.7 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 8.54
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Week 641.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 8.02
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)HR at Follow-up0.9 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital signs SBP and DBP were measured at each visit. All measurements were made on the participant non-dominant arm supported at heart level, using the same cuff size and same equipment. Blood pressure was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). If the participant was a smoker or used tobacco products, a period of 30 minutes without tobacco was allowed before taking these measurements. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 4-1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.1
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 8-2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.73
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 12-2.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.73
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 16-3.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.02
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 24-2.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.51
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 36-1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.14
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 52-1.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 16.18
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Week 64-2.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 13.78
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP at Follow-up-1.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.6
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 4-1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.41
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 8-2.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.53
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 12-2.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.74
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 16-2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.62
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 24-2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.48
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 36-2.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.85
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 52-3.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.94
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Week 64-6.3 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 6.72
RSG XRChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP at Follow-up-0.9 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.23
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema

Oedema was considered as adverse event of special interest (AESI). The process for AESI selection was based on RSG's pharmacologic class and relevant AEs potentially associated with RSG. The number of participants and their percentage for the adverse event of the various types of oedema were reported.

Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks

Population: All subject (Full population)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaOedema peripheral130 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaFace oedema8 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaPitting oedema5 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaOedema3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaPulmonary oedema1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of OedemaEyelid oedema1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT

The frequency of participant vital sign weight was obtained to check if the values have CFB of PCC IFB \>=7 percent. With the exception of Week 4, when participants were first titrated to the 8mg RSG XR dose, at every time point in the study where weight was measured the percentage of participants experienced an increase in BW of PCC was approximately 2 times greater than the percentage of participants experiencing an decrease in BW of PCC DFB \>=7 percent. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOTATOT, BW(IFB)>=7 percent188 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOTATOT, BW(DFB)>= 7 percent83 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOTFollow up, BW(IFB)>=7 percent90 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOTFollow up, BW(DFB)>= 7 percent51 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT

The clinical chemistry data included alanine amino transferase (ALT), albumin, aldolase, asparatate amino transferase (AST), BUN/creatinine ratio, carbon dioxide(CO2) content, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin (DB), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C), HDL, LDL, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), magnesium, potassium, sodium, total bilirubin (TB), triglycerides, troponin I, urea. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 82 (including follow up)

Population: All subject population (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, ALT (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Albumin (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Aldolase (high)16 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Aldolase (low)78 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Aldolase (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Aldolase (low)14 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, AST (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, AST (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, BUN/creatinine ratio (high)87 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, BUN/creatinine ratio (high)37 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, CO2 content (low)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, CO2 content (low)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, chloride (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, cholesterol (high)175 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, cholesterol (high)50 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, CK (high)131 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, CK (high)40 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Creatinine (high)27 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, creatinine (high)10 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, DB (high)4 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, GGT (high)7 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, GGT (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Glucose (high)100 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Glucose (low)40 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, glucose (high)31 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, glucose (low)13 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, HbA1c (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, HDL (low)11 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, HDL (low)7 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, LDL (low)469 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, LDL (low)211 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, LD (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, LD (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Magnesium (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Magnesium (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Potassium (high)17 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Potassium (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Potassium (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Potassium (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Sodium (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Sodium (low)4 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Sodium (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, TB (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, TB (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Triglycerides (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Troponin I (high)13 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Troponin I (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTATOT, Urea (high)97 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOTFollow up, Urea (high)42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT

The hematology data included eosinophils, haematocrit, haemoglobin, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes, platelet count, red cell distribution width (RDW), red blood cell (RBC) count, segmented neutrophils (SN), total neutrophils (TN), white blood cell (WBC) count. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 82 (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Eosinophils (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Haematocrit (low)8 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, Haematocrit (low)6 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Haemoglobin (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Haemoglobin (low)74 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, Hemoglobin (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, Hemoglobin (low)25 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Lymphocytes (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, Lymphocytes (low)21 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, Lymphocytes (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, Lymphocytes (low)9 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, MCH (low)5 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, MCH (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, MCV (low)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, monocytes (high)1 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, monocytes (low)61 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, monocytes (low)23 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, platelet count (high)7 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, platelet count (low)5 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, RDW (high)158 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, RDW (high)45 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, RBC (low)12 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, RBC (low)4 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, SN (high)6 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, SN (low)15 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, SN (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, SN (low)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, TN (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, TN (low)15 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, TN (high)2 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, TN (low)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, WBC (high)5 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTATOT, WBC (low)22 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, WBC (high)3 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOTFollow up, WBC (low)11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT

HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. The frequency of participant vital sign heart rate was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) 50-100 bpm or have a change from Baseline of PCC IFB \>=30 and DFB \>=30. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTATOT,HR (DFB)>=3014 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTFollow up,HR (RR)>100 or <5018 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTATOT,HR (RR)>100 or <5055 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTATOT,HR (IFB)>=3025 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTFollow up,HR (IFB)>=3011 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOTFollow up,HR (DFB)>=306 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)

The frequency of participant vital sign sitting blood pressure was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) for SBP 90-140 mmHg, DBP 50-90 mmHg or have a change from Baseline of PCC for SBP increase from Baseline (IFB) \>=40, decrease from Baseline (DFB) \>= 30 for and for DBP (IFB) \>= 30 ,DFB \>= 20. The number of participants with values of PCC at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow up were reported.

Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)

Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,SBP(RR)>140 or <90520 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,SBP(IFB)>=4033 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,SBP(DFB)>=30179 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up,SBP(RR)>140 or <90240 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up,SBP(IFB)>=4013 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up,SBP(DFB)>=3063 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,DBP(RR)>90 or<50141 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,DBP(IFB)>=3020 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)ATOT,DBP(DFB)>= 20211 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up,DBP(RR)>90 or<5054 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up,DBP(IFB)>=305 Participants
RSG XRNumber of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Follow up, DBP(DFB)>= 2067 Participants
Secondary

Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths

A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening condition, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Number of participants with SAEs and deaths were reported for treatment duration of the study.

Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks

Population: All subject (Full population)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RSG XRNumber Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and DeathsAny SAE126 Participants
RSG XRNumber Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and DeathsDeaths20 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026