Alzheimer's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
cognition, Alzheimer's disease, Rosiglitazone extended-release (XR), safety, adjunctive therapy, BRL-049653, tolerability, open-label extension
Brief summary
This is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label extension, single-group study in male and female outpatients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who have completed either AVA102670 or AVA102672. All subjects will receive rosiglitazone extended-release (RSG XR) 4mg once daily for the first 4 weeks of the study followed by 8mg RSG XR as adjunctive therapy to their existing dose of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Subject participation will last until one of 5 conditions applies. After a 52-week open-label treatment phase, subjects will attend a final Follow-Up Visit 6 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of RSG XR in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD who have completed either AVA102670 or AVA102672. The secondary objective of this study is to explore further the long-term efficacy of RSG XR in terms of cognitive function and overall clinical response as a function of apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 allele status.
Interventions
Experimental drug
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Successful completion of AVA102670 or AVA102672 without safety or tolerability issues. Regular caregiver.
Exclusion criteria
* Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA 1-4), clinically significant peripheral edema, other neurological conditions that might disqualify participation. SAE, clinically significant laboratory abnormality or significant cardiovascular event during prior study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs | Up to 76 Weeks | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The severity of the AE'S was categorized as mild, moderate and severe. Number of participants reporting AEs during the on treatment phase of the study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Up to 76 Weeks | Oedema was considered as adverse event of special interest (AESI). The process for AESI selection was based on RSG's pharmacologic class and relevant AEs potentially associated with RSG. The number of participants and their percentage for the adverse event of the various types of oedema were reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | Vital signs SBP and DBP were measured at each visit. All measurements were made on the participant non-dominant arm supported at heart level, using the same cuff size and same equipment. Blood pressure was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). If the participant was a smoker or used tobacco products, a period of 30 minutes without tobacco was allowed before taking these measurements. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | Vital sign HR was measured at each visit. HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | BW was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the body weight at specified visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Up to 82 Weeks (including follow up) | The clinical chemistry data included non-fasting measures of lipid metabolism (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the lipids (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides) value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | The frequency of participant vital sign sitting blood pressure was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) for SBP 90-140 mmHg, DBP 50-90 mmHg or have a change from Baseline of PCC for SBP increase from Baseline (IFB) \>=40, decrease from Baseline (DFB) \>= 30 for and for DBP (IFB) \>= 30 ,DFB \>= 20. The number of participants with values of PCC at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow up were reported. |
| Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. The frequency of participant vital sign heart rate was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) 50-100 bpm or have a change from Baseline of PCC IFB \>=30 and DFB \>=30. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported. |
| Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths | Up to 76 Weeks | A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening condition, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Number of participants with SAEs and deaths were reported for treatment duration of the study. |
| Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Up to Week 82 (including follow up) | The hematology data included eosinophils, haematocrit, haemoglobin, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes, platelet count, red cell distribution width (RDW), red blood cell (RBC) count, segmented neutrophils (SN), total neutrophils (TN), white blood cell (WBC) count. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported. |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Up to Week 82 (including follow up) | The clinical chemistry data included alanine amino transferase (ALT), albumin, aldolase, asparatate amino transferase (AST), BUN/creatinine ratio, carbon dioxide(CO2) content, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin (DB), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C), HDL, LDL, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), magnesium, potassium, sodium, total bilirubin (TB), triglycerides, troponin I, urea. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52 | The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores ranged from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52 | The CDR-SB is a validated clinical assessment of global function in par. with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or box scores, were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranged from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52 | The MMSE consisted of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores ranged from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52 | DAD, assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participant's ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) \* 100. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52 | 12-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, motor disturbance, appetite, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions=participant has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) on a 4-point scale, their severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) on a 3-point scale, and the distress on a 5-point scale. Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point. |
| Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT | Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up) | The frequency of participant vital sign weight was obtained to check if the values have CFB of PCC IFB \>=7 percent. With the exception of Week 4, when participants were first titrated to the 8mg RSG XR dose, at every time point in the study where weight was measured the percentage of participants experienced an increase in BW of PCC was approximately 2 times greater than the percentage of participants experiencing an decrease in BW of PCC DFB \>=7 percent. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A open-label extension study to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of rosiglitazone extended-release (RSG XR) tablets in participants with mild-to moderate Alzheimer's Disease conducted in a total of 29 countries across 267 centers from 08 August 2007 to 30 May 2009.
Pre-assignment details
Approximately 1800 participants were planned to be enrolled however a total of 1461 participants (after completing parent studies AVA102670/AVA102672) were enrolled and received open-label RSG-XR tablets.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| RSG XR (AVA102675) Eligible participants who completed studies AVA102670 or AVA102672 entered in this open-label extension study. Participants received open-label RSG XR throughout the treatment period as adjunctive therapy to their existing dose of AChEI for Alzheimer's disease treatment. Participants took one tablet of study medication daily in the morning with or without food. All participants received 4 mg once daily RSG XR for the first 4 weeks of the study (only for the first 4 weeks of the study). The RSG XR dose was then increased to 8 mg once daily from Week 4 through Week 52. The dose of RSG XR was reduced to 2mg once daily if the 8 mg dose was not well tolerated. Participants were not permitted to titrate back to 8 mg RSG XR. | 1,461 |
| Total | 1,461 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Abnormal ECG | 25 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 116 |
| Overall Study | Caregiver related | 20 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression | 4 |
| Overall Study | Efficacy related | 3 |
| Overall Study | Exclusion criteria met | 1 |
| Overall Study | Investigator decision | 3 |
| Overall Study | Legal representative withdrew consent | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 13 |
| Overall Study | Non-Compliance | 7 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant died | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant refused follow-up | 9 |
| Overall Study | Participant withdrawal due to surgery | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 45 |
| Overall Study | Still in the study at termination | 974 |
| Overall Study | Unmet inclusion-exclusion criteria | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 135 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | RSG XR (AVA102675) |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 73.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 52 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 1396 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 843 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 618 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 20 / 1,461 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 130 / 1,461 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 126 / 1,461 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The severity of the AE'S was categorized as mild, moderate and severe. Number of participants reporting AEs during the on treatment phase of the study.
Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks
Population: All Subjects (Full population), comprised of all participants who took at least one dose of open-label study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs | Any AE | 724 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs | Mild AE | 345 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs | Moderate AE | 289 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs | Severe AE | 88 Participants |
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status.
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores ranged from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negative, positive, homozygotes, heterozygotes).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 24 (Full population) | 2.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 52 (Full population) | 5.1 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 6.82 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 negatives) | 2.3 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 5.28 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 negatives) | 4.8 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 6.44 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 positives) | 2.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 5.66 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 52(APOE4 positives) | 5.4 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 7.11 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 2.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 5.77 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 5.2 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 7.49 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 2.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 5.63 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 5.4 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 7.02 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.
The CDR-SB is a validated clinical assessment of global function in par. with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or box scores, were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranged from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52
Population: All subject population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (Full population) | 0.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (Full population) | 1.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.26 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 negatives) | 0.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 negatives) | 1.3 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 positives) | 0.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 positives) | 1.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 0.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 1.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 0.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 1.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.
DAD, assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participant's ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) \* 100. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (Full population) | -5.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 12.36 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (Full population) | -10.8 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 15.07 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 negatives) | -4.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 11.57 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 negatives) | -10.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 positives) | -6.2 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 12.88 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 positives) | -10.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 15.26 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | -5.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 12.16 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | -12.6 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 11.84 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | -6.4 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 13.08 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | -10.1 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 16.14 |
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.
The MMSE consisted of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores ranged from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (Full population) | -1.2 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (Full population) | -2.3 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 negatives) | -0.7 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 negatives) | -1.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.56 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 positives) | -1.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 positives) | -2.8 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.17 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | -1.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | -2.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.16 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | -1.5 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | -2.9 Scores on scale | Standard Deviation 3.18 |
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status.
12-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, motor disturbance, appetite, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions=participant has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) on a 4-point scale, their severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) on a 3-point scale, and the distress on a 5-point scale. Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication (Week 0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the Baseline value minus the value at the specified time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24, 52
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.The analysis was done on the full population and was repeated for APOE subgroups (negatives, positives, homozygotes, heterozygotes).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (Full population) | 1.4 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 7.87 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (Full population) | 3.2 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 negatives) | 1.0 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 negatives) | 2.4 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 7.74 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 positives) | 1.7 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 8.29 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 positives) | 3.8 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 12.71 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 1.8 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 7.75 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 homozygotes) | 4.2 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 14.19 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 24 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 1.6 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 8.45 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE ε4 Status. | Week 52 (APOE4 E4 heterozygotes) | 3.7 Score on scale | Standard Deviation 12.34 |
Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides
The clinical chemistry data included non-fasting measures of lipid metabolism (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides). Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the lipids (TC,HDL,LDL,triglycerides) value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to 82 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at Week 4 | 0.076 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.6828 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at Week 16 | 0.201 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8666 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at Week 36 | 0.246 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.9649 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at Week 52 | 0.174 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 1.1437 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at Week 76 | -0.715 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.3041 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | TC at follow up | 0.093 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.9377 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at Week 4 | 0.007 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.2008 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at Week 16 | -0.014 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.2427 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at Week 36 | -0.026 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.2487 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at Week 52 | -0.035 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.2512 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at Week 76 | 0.050 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | — |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | HDL at follow up | -0.058 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.2605 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at Week 4 | 0.062 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.6207 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at Week 16 | 0.210 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.7782 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at Week 36 | 0.281 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8863 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at Week 52 | 0.228 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 1.0563 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at Week 76 | -0.200 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | — |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | LDL at follow up | 0.148 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8336 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at Week 4 | 0.004 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.7845 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at Week 16 | -0.025 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8053 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at Week 36 | -0.062 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8053 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at Week 52 | -0.092 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8521 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at Week 76 | -0.150 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.9758 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Namely Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides | Triglycerides at follow up | -0.035 millimole per litre (mmol/l) | Standard Deviation 0.8295 |
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW)
BW was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the body weight at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 16 | 0.7 kg | Standard Deviation 3.53 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 24 | 0.6 kg | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 4 | 0.3 kg | Standard Deviation 2.04 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 8 | 0.6 kg | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 12 | 0.6 kg | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 36 | 1.0 kg | Standard Deviation 4.08 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 52 | 1.2 kg | Standard Deviation 3.82 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Week 64 | 1.4 kg | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Body Weight (BW) | BW at Follow-up | 0.5 kg | Standard Deviation 3.15 |
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR)
Vital sign HR was measured at each visit. HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 4 | 1.0 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 8.95 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 8 | 1.8 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 12 | 1.6 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.77 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 16 | 1.6 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.66 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 24 | 0.9 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.99 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 36 | 1.3 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.86 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 52 | 0.7 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 8.54 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Week 64 | 1.0 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 8.02 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Heart Rate (HR) | HR at Follow-up | 0.9 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 10.03 |
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Vital signs SBP and DBP were measured at each visit. All measurements were made on the participant non-dominant arm supported at heart level, using the same cuff size and same equipment. Blood pressure was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). If the participant was a smoker or used tobacco products, a period of 30 minutes without tobacco was allowed before taking these measurements. Baseline for the open-label study was the latest assessment from Week 48 of parent studies to the first dose of open-label medication. Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 4 | -1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 8 | -2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 14.73 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 12 | -2.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 14.73 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 16 | -3.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 15.02 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 24 | -2.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 15.51 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 36 | -1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 15.14 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 52 | -1.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 16.18 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Week 64 | -2.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 13.78 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP at Follow-up | -1.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 4 | -1.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.41 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 8 | -2.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.53 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 12 | -2.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.74 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 16 | -2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.62 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 24 | -2.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.48 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 36 | -2.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.85 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 52 | -3.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.94 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Week 64 | -6.3 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 6.72 |
| RSG XR | Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP at Follow-up | -0.9 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 10.23 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema
Oedema was considered as adverse event of special interest (AESI). The process for AESI selection was based on RSG's pharmacologic class and relevant AEs potentially associated with RSG. The number of participants and their percentage for the adverse event of the various types of oedema were reported.
Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks
Population: All subject (Full population)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Oedema peripheral | 130 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Face oedema | 8 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Pitting oedema | 5 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Oedema | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Pulmonary oedema | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Oedema | Eyelid oedema | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT
The frequency of participant vital sign weight was obtained to check if the values have CFB of PCC IFB \>=7 percent. With the exception of Week 4, when participants were first titrated to the 8mg RSG XR dose, at every time point in the study where weight was measured the percentage of participants experienced an increase in BW of PCC was approximately 2 times greater than the percentage of participants experiencing an decrease in BW of PCC DFB \>=7 percent. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT | ATOT, BW(IFB)>=7 percent | 188 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT | ATOT, BW(DFB)>= 7 percent | 83 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT | Follow up, BW(IFB)>=7 percent | 90 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With BW Values of PCC ATOT | Follow up, BW(DFB)>= 7 percent | 51 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT
The clinical chemistry data included alanine amino transferase (ALT), albumin, aldolase, asparatate amino transferase (AST), BUN/creatinine ratio, carbon dioxide(CO2) content, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine, direct bilirubin (DB), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C), HDL, LDL, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), magnesium, potassium, sodium, total bilirubin (TB), triglycerides, troponin I, urea. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 82 (including follow up)
Population: All subject population (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, ALT (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Albumin (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Aldolase (high) | 16 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Aldolase (low) | 78 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Aldolase (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Aldolase (low) | 14 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, AST (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, AST (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, BUN/creatinine ratio (high) | 87 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, BUN/creatinine ratio (high) | 37 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, CO2 content (low) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, CO2 content (low) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, chloride (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, cholesterol (high) | 175 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, cholesterol (high) | 50 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, CK (high) | 131 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, CK (high) | 40 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Creatinine (high) | 27 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, creatinine (high) | 10 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, DB (high) | 4 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, GGT (high) | 7 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, GGT (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Glucose (high) | 100 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Glucose (low) | 40 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, glucose (high) | 31 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, glucose (low) | 13 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, HbA1c (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, HDL (low) | 11 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, HDL (low) | 7 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, LDL (low) | 469 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, LDL (low) | 211 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, LD (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, LD (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Magnesium (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Magnesium (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Potassium (high) | 17 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Potassium (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Potassium (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Potassium (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Sodium (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Sodium (low) | 4 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Sodium (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, TB (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, TB (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Triglycerides (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Troponin I (high) | 13 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Troponin I (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Urea (high) | 97 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters (Including Lipids) of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Urea (high) | 42 Participants |
Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT
The hematology data included eosinophils, haematocrit, haemoglobin, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes, platelet count, red cell distribution width (RDW), red blood cell (RBC) count, segmented neutrophils (SN), total neutrophils (TN), white blood cell (WBC) count. The number of participants with values of PCC (defined as high and low) ATOT were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 82 (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Eosinophils (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Haematocrit (low) | 8 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Haematocrit (low) | 6 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Haemoglobin (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Haemoglobin (low) | 74 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Hemoglobin (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Hemoglobin (low) | 25 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Lymphocytes (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, Lymphocytes (low) | 21 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Lymphocytes (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, Lymphocytes (low) | 9 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, MCH (low) | 5 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, MCH (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, MCV (low) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, monocytes (high) | 1 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, monocytes (low) | 61 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, monocytes (low) | 23 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, platelet count (high) | 7 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, platelet count (low) | 5 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, RDW (high) | 158 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, RDW (high) | 45 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, RBC (low) | 12 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, RBC (low) | 4 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, SN (high) | 6 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, SN (low) | 15 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, SN (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, SN (low) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, TN (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, TN (low) | 15 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, TN (high) | 2 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, TN (low) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, WBC (high) | 5 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | ATOT, WBC (low) | 22 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, WBC (high) | 3 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC ATOT | Follow up, WBC (low) | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT
HR was measured once, after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes. The frequency of participant vital sign heart rate was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) 50-100 bpm or have a change from Baseline of PCC IFB \>=30 and DFB \>=30. The number of participants with values of PCC including follow up were reported.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | ATOT,HR (DFB)>=30 | 14 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | Follow up,HR (RR)>100 or <50 | 18 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | ATOT,HR (RR)>100 or <50 | 55 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | ATOT,HR (IFB)>=30 | 25 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | Follow up,HR (IFB)>=30 | 11 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With HR Values of PCC ATOT | Follow up,HR (DFB)>=30 | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)
The frequency of participant vital sign sitting blood pressure was obtained to check if the values lie outside of a pre-determined reference range (RR) for SBP 90-140 mmHg, DBP 50-90 mmHg or have a change from Baseline of PCC for SBP increase from Baseline (IFB) \>=40, decrease from Baseline (DFB) \>= 30 for and for DBP (IFB) \>= 30 ,DFB \>= 20. The number of participants with values of PCC at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow up were reported.
Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks (including follow up)
Population: All subject (Full population). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,SBP(RR)>140 or <90 | 520 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,SBP(IFB)>=40 | 33 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,SBP(DFB)>=30 | 179 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up,SBP(RR)>140 or <90 | 240 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up,SBP(IFB)>=40 | 13 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up,SBP(DFB)>=30 | 63 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,DBP(RR)>90 or<50 | 141 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,DBP(IFB)>=30 | 20 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | ATOT,DBP(DFB)>= 20 | 211 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up,DBP(RR)>90 or<50 | 54 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up,DBP(IFB)>=30 | 5 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number of Participants With SBP and DBP Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) | Follow up, DBP(DFB)>= 20 | 67 Participants |
Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths
A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening condition, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Number of participants with SAEs and deaths were reported for treatment duration of the study.
Time frame: Up to 76 Weeks
Population: All subject (Full population)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG XR | Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths | Any SAE | 126 Participants |
| RSG XR | Number Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths | Deaths | 20 Participants |