Skip to content

Persistence Study of GSK Biologicals' Tdap Vaccine 1, 3, 5 and 9 Years Following Administration as an Initial Single Dose in Healthy Young Adults and to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Boostrix as a Second Dose of Tdap, When Administered at Year 9

Persistence Study of GSK Biologicals' Tdap Vaccine (776423), 1, 3, 5 and 9 Years Following Administration as a Single Dose in NCT00346073 Study and to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Boostrix as a Second Dose of Tdap, When Administered at Year 9

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00489970
Enrollment
1954
Registered
2007-06-22
Start date
2007-06-01
Completion date
2016-03-01
Last updated
2020-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acellular Pertussis, Tetanus, Diphtheria

Keywords

Persistence, immunogenicity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persistence of antibodies against all the vaccine antigens 1, 3, 5 and 9 years after an initial vaccination with Tdap, and also to assess immunogenicity and safety of another dose of Boostrix, administered in this study. This protocol posting deals with objectives and outcome measures of the extension phase. The objectives and outcome measures of the primary phase are presented in a separate protocol posting (NCT number = NCT00346073).

Detailed description

Subjects were previously vaccinated with either Boostrix or a control Tdap vaccine (Sanofi Pasteurs' Adacel) in study NCT00346073. Only subjects who were part of the primary study will be invited to participate in this study. All subjects will receive a single dose of Boostrix at Visit 6 (Day 0) and subjects will be observed till Visit 7 (Day 30) for safety in terms of solicited adverse events (during 4 days post vaccination), unsolicited adverse events (during 31 days post vaccination) and serious adverse event (during the trial period). A blood sample will be collected from all subjects before vaccination (Visit 6) and one month after vaccination (Visit 7) for antibodies estimation. This summary has been updated following Protocol amendment 1 dated 09 November 2010, amendment 2 dated 18 February 2014, and amendment 3 dated 10 December 2014. The protocol was amended first due to the following reasons: 1. The maximum window period allowed for the return of subjects for the Year 5 and Year 10 follow-up visits (Visit 5 and Visit 6) was extended from ± 5 weeks to ± 8 weeks. 2. The contact details for reporting of SAEs were clarified. 3. Text pertaining to the reporting of spontaneous abortion was removed from the protocol. 4. The number of attempts to contact subjects who did not return for scheduled persistence visits was clarified. The main purpose of protocol amendment 2 is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Boostrix as a second dose of Tdap vaccine when administered 8 years after an initial dose of Tdap. The Year 10 time point for evaluation of persistence has been cancelled because it is no longer feasible to conduct after a second dose of Tdap vaccine has been administered at Year 8. The purpose of amendment 3 is to add co-primary objective to demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Boostrix group and Adacel group) is non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Tdap vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (PT, FHA and PRN) antigens, one month following vaccination according to CBER's input. Accordingly, the study start has been pushed to Year 9 and this is reflected throughout the document.

Interventions

PROCEDURETaking of blood samples

No treatment is planned to be given in this study. Blood samples will be collected at the following time points: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 9 years after the dose of vaccination.

BIOLOGICALBoostrix

A single dose of Boostrix was administered in the primary study (NCT00346073). No treatment was given in this study.

BIOLOGICALAdacel

A single dose of Adacel was administered in the primary study (NCT00346073). No treatment was given in this study.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Years to 73 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Persistence follow-up phase up to Year 9 time point: The following criteria are applicable to subjects who refuse vaccination at Year 8 time point: All subjects who received study vaccination (Boostrix or Adacel) in study NCT00346073 will be considered eligible to participate in this study. Written informed consent must be obtained from the subject prior to each study time point. Vaccination phase at Year 9 applicable for subjects in Boostrix and Adacel groups only: The following criterion is applicable to subjects willing to consent to vaccination at Year 9 time point in the Boostrix and Adacel groups: • All subjects who received study vaccination (Boostrix or Adacel) in study NCT00346073 will be considered eligible to participate in this study. Vaccination phase at Year 9 applicable for subjects in the Control group only: The following criterion is applicable to subjects willing to consent to vaccination at Year 9 time point in the Control group only: • Subjects within the age range of 28-73 years will be considered eligible to participate in this study in the Control group. Vaccination phase at Year 9 applicable for ALL subjects (Control, Boostrix and Adacel groups): The following criteria are applicable to subjects willing to consent to vaccination at Year 9 time point in the Boostrix, Adacel and Control groups: All subjects must satisfy the following criteria at study entry at Year 9 time point: Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. completion of the diary cards, return for follow-up visits). Written informed consent obtained from the subject for vaccination at Year 9 time point. Healthy subjects as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study. * Female subjects of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study. * Non-childbearing potential is defined as pre-menarche, current tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovariectomy or post-menopause. * Female subjects of child bearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the subject * has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination, and * has a negative pregnancy test on the day of vaccination, and * has agreed to continue adequate contraception for 1 month after completion of the vaccine dose

Exclusion criteria

The following criteria should be checked at the time of Year 9 vaccination time point. If any criteria is applicable, the subject must not be vaccinated in the study: For subjects in Boostrix and Adacel groups: • Administration of Tdap vaccine since the last dose received in the study NCT00346073. For subjects in the Control group: • Administration of Tdap (Boostrix or Adacel) vaccine at any time prior to the administration of Boostrix vaccine in this study. For ALL subjects (Control, Boostrix and Adacel groups): Use of any investigational or non-registered product other than the study vaccine within 30 days preceding the dose of study vaccine, or planned use during the study period, 31 days (Day 0-30). * Chronic administration (defined as more than 14 days in total) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs within six months prior to Visit 6 (pre-vacc). Inhaled and topical steroids are allowed. * Planned administration/administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol in the period starting 30 days before and ending 30 days after the dose of vaccine, with the exception of inactivated Influenza vaccine which is allowed throughout the study period, 31 days (Day 0-30). \-- Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period, in which the subject has been or will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational vaccine/product. * Hypersensitivity to latex. * History of diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis diseases. * Severe allergic reaction (e.g. anaphylaxis) after previous administration of any tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, or pertussis-antigen containing vaccines, or any component of Boostrix. * History of any neurological disorders or seizures. * Encephalopathy (e.g. coma, decreased level of consciousness, prolonged seizures) of unknown etiology occurring within seven days following previous vaccination with pertussis-containing vaccine. * Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition, based on medical history and physical examination (no laboratory testing required). * Acute disease and/or fever at the time of enrolment. * Fever is defined as temperature ≥ 100.4°F by any route. The preferred route for recording temperature in this study will be oral. * Subjects with a minor illness (such as mild diarrhea, mild upper respiratory infection) without fever may, be enrolled at the discretion of the investigator. * Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within three months preceding the dose of study vaccine or planned administration during the study period, 31 days (Day 0-30). Administration of any tetanus or diphtheria containing vaccine or any registered or investigational vaccine utilizing a diphtheria toxoid or tetanus toxoid carrier within 5 years prior to the administration of Boostrix vaccine in this study. * Acute or chronic, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by physical examination or laboratory screening tests. * Pregnant or lactating female. * Female planning to become pregnant or planning to discontinue contraceptive precautions during the 31 day (Day 0-30) follow-up period post-vaccination.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Anti-diphtheria (Anti-D) Antibody Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to (≥) Protocol Specified Cut-offAt year 1 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL) determined with Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Number of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-offAt year 3 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA
Number of Subjects With Anti-tetanus (Anti-T) Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-offAt year 1 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.
Number of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-offAt year 3 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.
Number of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAt Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.Number of subjects with anti-D and anti-T concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mL were tabulated
Anti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAt Year 9, one month before booster vaccinationAnti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody concentrations were measured by ELISA, tabulated as GMCs and expressed in IU/mL.
Booster Response to D and T AntigensAt Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.A booster response was defined as: for initially seronegative subjects (S-) (pre-vaccination concentration below cut-off: \< 0.1 IU/mL) antibody concentrations at least four times the cut-off (post vaccination concentration ≥ 0.4 IU/mL); for initially seropositive subjects (S+) (pre-vaccination concentration ≥ 0.1 IU/mL): an increase in antibody concentrations of at least four times the pre-vaccination concentration; Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative.
Booster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAt Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.Booster response was defined as: for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration \< 5 EL.U/mL (S-): antibody concentration ≥ 20 EL.U/mL; for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 5 EL.U/mL and \< 20 EL.U/mL (S+, \<4\*cut-off): antibody concentration at least four times the pre-vaccination concentration; for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 20 EL.U/mL (S+, ≥4\*cut-off): antibody concentration at least two times the pre-vaccination concentration; Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-PRN antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL
Alternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensAt Year 9, one month after booster vaccinationAlternative Booster response to D and T antigens is defined as: - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration below 0.1 IU/mL: antibody concentrations at least four times the 0.1IU/ML, one month after vaccination, and - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥0.1 IU/mL and \<1.0 IU/mL: antibody concentrations of at least four times the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥1.0 IU/mL and \<6.0 IU/mL: antibody concentrations of at least two times the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - Subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥6.0 IU/mL are not evaluable for booster response. S- = Antibody concentration \< 0.1 IU/mL S+ = Antibody concentration ≥ 0.1 IU/mL Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative
Alternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensAt Year 9, one month after booster vaccinationAlternative Booster response to PT, FHA and PRN antigens is defined as: - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration below the assay cut off: antibody concentrations at least four times the assay cut off one month after vaccination, and - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥ assay cut off and \< 60 IU/mL: antibody concentration increase of at least 30 IU/mL from the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥ 60 IU/mL : at least 1.5 fold increase of antibody concentration from the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. S- = seronegative subjects (antibody concentration below assay cut off for anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN) S+ = seropositive subjects (antibody concentration below assay cut off for anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN) Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative
Seroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationAt Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)Seroprotection status for anti-D antibody concentration \< 0.1 IU/mL were tested for neutralizing antibodies using a VERO-cell neutralization assay. Seroprotection rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with antibody concentrations greater than or equal (≥) the seroprotection cut-off value defined for that antibody.
Number of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)The cut-off for anti-PT concentrations was defined as ≥ 5 ELISA units per mililiter (EL.U/mL).
Number of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9During the 4-day (Days 0-3) post vaccination period.The solicited general symptoms assessed were Fatigue, Gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain), Headache and Fever \[defined as temperature of ≥100.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F) by any route\]. Any = Occurrence of any general symptom regardless of its intensity grade or relationship to vaccination; Grade 3 Symptom = Symptom that prevented normal activity; Grade 3 Fever \> 104.0 degrees F.
Number of Subjects With Any Large Injection Site Reaction - Year 9During the 4-day (Days 0-3) follow-up period after vaccination.Large injection site reaction = a swelling with a diameter \> 100 mm, noticeable diffuse swelling or noticeable increase in limb circumference.
Number of Subjects With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) - Year 9During the 31-day (Days 0-30) post-vaccination period.An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical oc-currence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Year 9During the 31-day (Days 0-30) post-vaccination periodSAEs assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life-threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity.
Number of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9During the 4-day (Days 0-3) post vaccination period.Solicited local symptoms assessed were pain, redness and swelling. Any was defined as any solicited local symptom reported irrespective of intensity. Grade 3 pain was defined as significant pain at rest that prevented normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness and swelling was greater than 50 millimeters (mm)
Number of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offAt Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)The cut-off for anti-PT concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 2.693 IU/mL.
Number of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)The cut-off for anti-FHA concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 5 EL.U/mL.
Number of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)The cut-off for anti-PRN concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 5 EL.U/mL.
Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-D antibody concentration is expressed as geometric mean concentration (GMC) in IU/mL.
Anti-T Antibody ConcentrationAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-T antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL.
Anti-PT Antibody ConcentrationAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-PT antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in EL.U/mL.
Anti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationAt 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)Anti-FHA antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1592 participants were enrolled in the study at Year 1 (in the Boostrix and Adacel groups). As per advice from the Centre for Biologics and Research Evaluation (CBER), an additional treatment group acting as control was also added at Year 9, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed was 1592 (Year 1) + 362 (Year 9) = 1954.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who received a single dose of Boostrix or Adacel vaccines, in the primary study (NCT00346073) were included in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Boostrix Group
Subjects received in the primary study (NCT00346073) a single dose of Boostrix vaccine \[Tdap\](GSK776423) intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant upper arm and in this study at Year 9 received a second dose of Boostrix vaccine \[Tdap\](GSK776423).
1,069
Adacel Group
Subjects received in the primary study (NCT00346073) a single dose of Adacel vaccine intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant upper arm and in this study at Year 9 received a dose of Boostrix vaccine \[Tdap\](GSK776423).
523
Control Group
Subjects received the first dose of Boostrix vaccine \[Tdap\](GSK776423) in this study at Year 9.
362
Total1,954

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Persistence Year 9Lost to Follow-up223
Persistence Year 9Other102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBoostrix GroupAdacel GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.39
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.27
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.35
Sex: Female, Male
Female
680 Participants357 Participants196 Participants1233 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
389 Participants166 Participants166 Participants721 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3090 / 1380 / 362
other
Total, other adverse events
213 / 30995 / 138172 / 362
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3090 / 1381 / 362

Outcome results

Primary

Anti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody Concentrations

Anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody concentrations were measured by ELISA, tabulated as GMCs and expressed in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before booster vaccination

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-FHA42.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PT8.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PRN63.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-FHA28.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PT7.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PRN64.7 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PT5.4 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-PRN17.8 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsAnti-FHA23.6 IU/mL
Primary

Anti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody Concentrations

Anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody concentrations were measured by ELISA, tabulated as GMCs and expressed in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination

Population: Analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated Cohort (TVC) at Year 9 which included all subjects with a study vaccine administration dose documented: a safety analysis based on the TVC included all vaccinated subjects, an immunogenicity analysis based on the TVC included all vaccinated subjects for whom immunogenicity results were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-PT64.1 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-FHA247.9 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-PRN405.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-PT70.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-FHA254.6 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT), Anti-filamentous Hemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) and Anti-pertactin (Anti-PRN) Antibody ConcentrationsANTI-PRN511.8 IU/mL
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Boostrix Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-PT one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [1.31, 1.79]GMC ratio
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Boostrix Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-FHA one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [4.62, 6.01]GMC ratio
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Boostrix Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-PRN one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [3.07, 4.25]GMC ratio
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Adacel Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-PT one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [1.33, 2.03]GMC ratio
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Adacel Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-FHA one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [4.37, 6.36]GMC ratio
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Tdap vaccine, Boostrix (Adacel Group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a three dose series of Infanrix vaccine in infants in the German household contact efficacy study APV-039, with respect to antibodies against anti-PRN one month following vaccination97.5% CI: [3.58, 5.57]GMC ratio
Primary

Booster Response to D and T Antigens

A booster response was defined as: for initially seronegative subjects (S-) (pre-vaccination concentration below cut-off: \< 0.1 IU/mL) antibody concentrations at least four times the cut-off (post vaccination concentration ≥ 0.4 IU/mL); for initially seropositive subjects (S+) (pre-vaccination concentration ≥ 0.1 IU/mL): an increase in antibody concentrations of at least four times the pre-vaccination concentration; Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S+153 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, Total169 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, S-5 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, S+121 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, Total126 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S-16 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S+68 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S-3 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, Total44 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, Total71 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, S+44 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, Total157 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, Total222 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, S-18 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-T, S+139 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S-35 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to D and T AntigensAnti-D, S+187 Participants
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against diphtheria antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-14.67, 2.85]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against tetanus antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-10.63, 7.79]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against diphtheria antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-20.33, 2.73]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against tetanus antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-22.98, 0.15]
Primary

Booster Response to PT, FHA and PRN Antigens

Booster response was defined as: for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration \< 5 EL.U/mL (S-): antibody concentration ≥ 20 EL.U/mL; for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 5 EL.U/mL and \< 20 EL.U/mL (S+, \<4\*cut-off): antibody concentration at least four times the pre-vaccination concentration; for subjects with pre-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 20 EL.U/mL (S+, ≥4\*cut-off): antibody concentration at least two times the pre-vaccination concentration; Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, < 4*cut-off16 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S-34 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, < 4*cut-off106 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off95 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, Total235 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off216 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, Total232 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S-4 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, < 4*cut-off27 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off179 Participants
Boostrix GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, Total210 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, Total98 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S-1 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, < 4*cut-off9 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off106 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S-1 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S-10 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off87 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, Total116 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, < 4*cut-off53 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, Total106 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, < 4*cut-off10 Participants
Adacel GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off43 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off175 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S+, < 4*cut-off75 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, Total292 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S-5 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off228 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, Total303 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, ≥ 4*cut-off97 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-FHA, S+, < 4*cut-off70 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, S-31 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S-101 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PRN, Total281 Participants
Control GroupBooster Response to PT, FHA and PRN AntigensAnti-PT, S+, < 4*cut-off94 Participants
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against PT antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-9.09, 3.08]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against FHA antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-13.16, -1.4]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against PRN antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-17.5, -3.38]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against PT antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-10.03, 5.57]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against FHA antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-2.38, 8.66]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to booster response against PRN antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-14.53, 3.18]
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mL

Number of subjects with anti-D and anti-T concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mL were tabulated

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after the booster vaccination.

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML245 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML263 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 1 IU/ML114 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 1 IU/ML211 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 1 IU/ML101 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML113 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 1 IU/ML54 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML120 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 1 IU/ML231 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-T, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML304 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 1 IU/ML92 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D and Anti-T Concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and 1 IU/mLAnti-D, ≥ 0.1 IU/ML265 Participants
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group and Control group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to seroprotection rate against diphtheria antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-1.16, 4.17]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Boostrix group and Control group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to seroprotection rate against tetanus antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-1.52, 2.07]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group and Control group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to seroprotection rate against diphtheria antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-3.41, 4.15]
Comparison: To demonstrate that the immune response elicited by a second dose of Boostrix vaccine (Adacel group and Control group) was non-inferior to the immune response elicited by a first dose of Boostrix vaccine (Control group), with respect to seroprotection rate against tetanus antigen, one month following vaccination.97.5% CI: [-3.69, 2.07]
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ to 0.1IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before the booster vaccination.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off245 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off113 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At year 5 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off735 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off359 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA

Time frame: At year 3 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off857 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-D Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off425 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-diphtheria (Anti-D) Antibody Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to (≥) Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-D cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL) determined with Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Time frame: At year 1 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-diphtheria (Anti-D) Antibody Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to (≥) Protocol Specified Cut-off967 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-diphtheria (Anti-D) Antibody Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to (≥) Protocol Specified Cut-off489 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before the booster vaccination.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off263 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off120 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At year 5 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off772 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off370 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At year 3 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off899 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-T Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off440 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Anti-tetanus (Anti-T) Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off

Anti-T cut-off was defined as ≥ 0.1 IU/mL as assessed by ELISA.

Time frame: At year 1 after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-tetanus (Anti-T) Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off1000 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-tetanus (Anti-T) Antibody Concentrations ≥ Protocol Specified Cut-off504 Participants
Secondary

Alternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN Antigens

Alternative Booster response to PT, FHA and PRN antigens is defined as: - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration below the assay cut off: antibody concentrations at least four times the assay cut off one month after vaccination, and - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥ assay cut off and \< 60 IU/mL: antibody concentration increase of at least 30 IU/mL from the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥ 60 IU/mL : at least 1.5 fold increase of antibody concentration from the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. S- = seronegative subjects (antibody concentration below assay cut off for anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN) S+ = seropositive subjects (antibody concentration below assay cut off for anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN) Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after booster vaccination

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, S-4 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ 60 IU/mL7 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, Total230 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL115 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ 60 IU/mL82 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ 60 IU/mL111 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL171 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL169 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, Total253 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, Total210 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, S-34 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, S-1 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL91 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ 60 IU/mL27 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, Total119 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, S-1 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL52 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ 60 IU/mL53 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, Total106 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, S-10 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL83 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ 60 IU/mL3 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, Total96 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, Total310 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ 60 IU/mL10 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, S-101 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ 60 IU/mL64 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, S-5 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL166 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL185 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-FHA, ≥ assay Cut-off and < 60 IU/mL241 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, ≥ 60 IU/mL62 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, S-31 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PT, Total277 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Responses to Anti-PT, Anti-FHA and Anti-PRN AntigensANTI-PRN, Total278 Participants
Secondary

Alternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T Antigens

Alternative Booster response to D and T antigens is defined as: - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration below 0.1 IU/mL: antibody concentrations at least four times the 0.1IU/ML, one month after vaccination, and - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥0.1 IU/mL and \<1.0 IU/mL: antibody concentrations of at least four times the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - For subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥1.0 IU/mL and \<6.0 IU/mL: antibody concentrations of at least two times the pre-booster antibody concentration, one month after vaccination. - Subjects with pre-booster antibody concentration ≥6.0 IU/mL are not evaluable for booster response. S- = Antibody concentration \< 0.1 IU/mL S+ = Antibody concentration ≥ 0.1 IU/mL Total = subjects either seropositive or seronegative

Time frame: At Year 9, one month after booster vaccination

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (<1 IU/ML)46 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)84 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)151 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, Total202 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S-16 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (<1 IU/ML)103 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, Total203 Participants
Boostrix GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S-5 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (<1 IU/ML)14 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S-3 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)74 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)40 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, Total88 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, Total88 Participants
Adacel GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (<1 IU/ML)45 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, Total242 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S-35 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (<1 IU/ML)148 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)65 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-D, Total248 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S-18 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (<1 IU/ML)65 Participants
Control GroupAlternative Booster Response to Anti-D and Anti-T AntigensANTI-T, S+ (≥1 IU/ML)159 Participants
Secondary

Anti-D Antibody Concentration

Anti-D antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster0.7 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster4.1 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster0.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster4.7 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster0.4 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster4.0 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-D Antibody Concentration

Anti-D antibody concentration is expressed as geometric mean concentration (GMC) in IU/mL.

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 11.4 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 30.9 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 50.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 11.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 31.0 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-D Antibody ConcentrationYear 50.9 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-FHA Antibody Concentration

Anti-FHA antibody concentration was expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster42.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster247.9 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster28.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster254.6 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster23.6 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster373.6 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-FHA Antibody Concentration

Anti-FHA antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 1190.1 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 3114.1 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 5110.0 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 1118.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 381.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-FHA Antibody ConcentrationYear 580.8 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-PRN Antibody Concentration

Anti-PRN antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 1152.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 382.5 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 585.3 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 1132.5 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 370.6 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationYear 577.4 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-PRN Antibody Concentration

Anti-PRN antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster63.8 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster405.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster64.7 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster511.8 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster17.8 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-PRN Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster336.4 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-PT Antibody Concentration

Anti-PT antibody concentration was expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster8.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster64.1 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster7.8 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster70.4 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster5.4 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster66.2 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-PT Antibody Concentration

Anti-PT antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in EL.U/mL.

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 122.4 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 314.1 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 514.6 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 115.6 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 310.0 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-PT Antibody ConcentrationYear 511.6 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-T Antibody Concentration

Anti-T antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 13.4 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 32.2 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 52.0 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 14.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 32.9 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationYear 52.5 IU/mL
Secondary

Anti-T Antibody Concentration

Anti-T antibody concentration is expressed as GMC in IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Boostrix GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster1.8 IU/mL
Boostrix GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster8.4 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster2.3 IU/mL
Adacel GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster8.6 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster1.5 IU/mL
Control GroupAnti-T Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster8.8 IU/mL
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-FHA concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 2.046 IU/mL

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster271 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster271 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster119 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster121 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster322 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster327 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-FHA concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 5 EL.U/mL.

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 11012 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3913 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5788 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 1501 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3437 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5368 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-PT concentrations was defined as ≥ 5 ELISA units per mililiter (EL.U/mL).

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 1917 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3751 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5670 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 1435 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3316 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (PT) Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5285 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-PRN concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 2.187 IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster267 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster271 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster117 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster121 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster284 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster326 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-PRN concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 5 EL.U/mL.

Time frame: At 1, 3, and 5 years after the vaccination in primary study (NCT00346073)

Population: The analysis was performed on the Adapted ATP cohort for immunogenicity, which included all evaluable subjects who met all eligibility criteria and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures obtained from the ATP cohort for immunogenicity corresponding to each time point were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 1971 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3862 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5755 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 1489 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 3426 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PRN Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offYear 5362 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-off

The cut-off for anti-PT concentrations was defined as equal to or greater than 2.693 IU/mL.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster230 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster268 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster106 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster120 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPre-booster209 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above Protocol Specified Cut-offPost-booster322 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9

Solicited local symptoms assessed were pain, redness and swelling. Any was defined as any solicited local symptom reported irrespective of intensity. Grade 3 pain was defined as significant pain at rest that prevented normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness and swelling was greater than 50 millimeters (mm)

Time frame: During the 4-day (Days 0-3) post vaccination period.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort at Year 9, which included all subjects with study vaccine administration dose documented, who returned at Year 9 and had their diary cards completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Pain180 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Pain3 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Redness74 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Redness5 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Swelling57 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Swelling4 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Swelling2 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Pain84 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Redness2 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Swelling26 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Pain1 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Redness32 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Pain4 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Redness53 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Swelling2 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Redness0 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Pain132 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms - Year 9Any Swelling41 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9

The solicited general symptoms assessed were Fatigue, Gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain), Headache and Fever \[defined as temperature of ≥100.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F) by any route\]. Any = Occurrence of any general symptom regardless of its intensity grade or relationship to vaccination; Grade 3 Symptom = Symptom that prevented normal activity; Grade 3 Fever \> 104.0 degrees F.

Time frame: During the 4-day (Days 0-3) post vaccination period.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort at Year 9, which included all subjects with study vaccine administration dose documented, who returned at Year 9 and had their diary cards completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fatigue71 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fatigue3 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Gastrointestinal symptoms27 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Gastrointestinal symptoms0 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Headache52 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Headache0 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fever2 Participants
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fever0 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Gastrointestinal symptoms4 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fever0 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Gastrointestinal symptoms0 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Headache25 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Headache1 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fatigue23 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fatigue1 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fever0 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Gastrointestinal symptoms29 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fatigue0 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fatigue51 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Gastrointestinal symptoms0 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Fever2 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Headache1 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Any Headache53 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any, Grade 3 and Related Solicited General Symptoms - Year 9Grade 3 Fever0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Any Large Injection Site Reaction - Year 9

Large injection site reaction = a swelling with a diameter \> 100 mm, noticeable diffuse swelling or noticeable increase in limb circumference.

Time frame: During the 4-day (Days 0-3) follow-up period after vaccination.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort at Year 9, which included all subjects with study vaccine administration dose documented, who returned at Year 9.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Large Injection Site Reaction - Year 90 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Large Injection Site Reaction - Year 90 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Large Injection Site Reaction - Year 90 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) - Year 9

An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical oc-currence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.

Time frame: During the 31-day (Days 0-30) post-vaccination period.

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort at Year 9, which included all subjects with study vaccine administration dose documented, who returned at Year 9.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) - Year 942 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) - Year 923 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) - Year 937 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Year 9

SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life-threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity.

Time frame: During the 31-day (Days 0-30) post-vaccination period

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort at Year 9, which included all subjects with study vaccine administration dose documented, who returned at Year 9.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Boostrix GroupNumber of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Year 90 Participants
Adacel GroupNumber of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Year 90 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Year 91 Participants
Secondary

Seroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody Concentration

Seroprotection status for anti-D antibody concentration \< 0.1 IU/mL were tested for neutralizing antibodies using a VERO-cell neutralization assay. Seroprotection rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with antibody concentrations greater than or equal (≥) the seroprotection cut-off value defined for that antibody.

Time frame: At Year 9, one month before(pre booster) and after the booster vaccination(post booster)

Population: Analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) Cohort for analysis of immunogenicity at Year 9, which included all subjects who received the dose of study vaccine and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen component after Year 9 vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Boostrix GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster8.3 Percentage of subjects
Boostrix GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster50.0 Percentage of subjects
Adacel GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster40.0 Percentage of subjects
Adacel GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster0.0 Percentage of subjects
Control GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPre-booster27.6 Percentage of subjects
Control GroupSeroprotection Status for Anti-D Antibody ConcentrationPost-booster14.3 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026