Depression
Conditions
Keywords
MST, Magnetic Seizure Therapy, ECT, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Depression, Magnetic
Brief summary
This study will compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in patients currently experiencing a major depressive episode in the context of either unipolar or bipolar depression. The investigators will conduct a number of clinical and neuropsychological tests to assess clinical and cognitive response to treatment. The investigators hypothesize that: 1. MST and ECT will have similar antidepressant efficacy. 2. MST will have less post-treatment amnesia than ECT as reflected in primary measures of anterograde and retrograde amnesia following the acute treatment phase. 3. At follow up, MST will show a lesser degree of persisting deficit in measures of retrograde amnesia than ECT.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in patients currently experiencing a major depressive episode in the context of either unipolar or bipolar depression. ECT is known to be highly effective in treating depression, but it can have some adverse cognitive side effects. MST is a new form of convulsive therapy that is being developed as a means of improving the side effect profile of ECT so that more patients may benefit without suffering significant detrimental effects on cognition. Both ECT and MST cause a seizure, but they do so in different ways. In ECT, an electrical stimulator is used to pass an electrical current between two electrodes placed on the person's head, which causes some electricity to go through the brain and cause a seizure. In MST, a magnetic stimulator is used to pass a magnetic field to the brain, which then creates a small electrical field in the brain that causes a seizure. In addition to the treatment sessions, this study will involve a number of assessments at different timepoints that are used to evaluate the person's antidepressant response and the physical and cognitive side effects of treatment.
Interventions
DEVICEThymatron
Right unilateral placement, 6x seizure threshold, 3 times per week until clinically appropriate to stop (approximately 2-6 weeks)
DEVICEMagstim Theta
100% power, vertex placement, 3 times per week, until clinically appropriate to stop (approximately 2-6 weeks)
Sponsors
Duke University
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Stanley Medical Research Institute
Sarah Lisanby
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18-90 * Clinical diagnosis of major depressive episode, in the context of unipolar or bipolar disorder * Use of effective method of birth control for women of child-bearing capacity * Willing and capable to provide informed consent * Convulsive therapy clinically indicated * Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD24) ≥ 20
Exclusion criteria
* Current unstable or serious medical condition, or any comorbid medical condition that substantially increases the risks of ECT (such as acute myocardial infarction, space occupying brain lesion or other cause of increased intracranial pressure, unstable aneurysm or vascular malformation, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, carcinoma, renal failure, hepatic failure) * Pregnancy * History of neurological disorder, epilepsy, stroke, brain surgery, metal in the head, history of known structural brain lesion * Presence of devices that may be affected by MST (pacemaker, medication pump, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator) * Breast-feeding * History of head trauma with loss of consciousness for greater than 5 minutes * History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or rapid cycling bipolar disorder * Vagus nerve stimulator implanted * History of substance abuse or dependence in past 3 months * Failure to respond to an adequate course of ECT in the current depressive episode * History of ECT in the past 6 months and/or failure to respond to an adequate trial of ECT lifetime * Presence of intracardiac lines
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical improvement (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) | After each treatment and at follow-ups up to 6 months after the treatment course |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical improvement (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician-Rated) | Before and after treatment course, and at follow-ups up to 6 months after the treatment course |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed