Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Schizophrenic Adults With Cognitive Deficits

A 4-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Cognitive Deficits Associated With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00487942
Enrollment
60
Registered
2007-06-19
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2013-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if adjunctive armodafinil treatment can improve the cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia

Interventions

DRUGarmodafinil

50 mg/day armodafinil

DRUGplacebo

placebo

Sponsors

Cephalon
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * The patient has a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria as determined by the SCID and has been clinically stable in a nonacute phase of their illness for at least 8 weeks prior to the baseline visit. * The patient has received treatment with olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for schizophrenia for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening visit and has been on a stable dose of olanzapine, oral risperidone, or paliperidone for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. The patient is prepared to remain at these stable dosages for the duration of the study. * The patient is a man or woman 18 through 60 years of age. * The patient is in good health (except for the diagnosis of schizophrenia) as judged by the investigator on the basis of medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. * Women of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. * The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions, to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol. Key

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has any Axis I disorder, including schizoaffective disorder and sleep disorders, apart from schizophrenia, and nicotine dependence. * The patient has tardive dyskinesia or any other clinically significant movement disorder. * The patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic systems) or surgical condition. * The patient has previously received modafinil or armodafinil, or the patient has a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the study drug tablets. * The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represents the change from baseline to last observation after baseline in Composite T-Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Baseline and 1 weekThe CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or last observation following baseline) in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoresBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1 in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoresBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the ESS total score.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Baseline and 2 weeksThe CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 2.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeksThe CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 4.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Week 1The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 1 is presented here.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Week 2The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 2 is presented here.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Week 4The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 is presented here.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineBaselineThe CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite ScoreBaseline and 4 weeksThe MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in composite T-score from baseline to 4 weeks.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Processing Speed Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Attention/Vigilance Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Working Memory Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Verbal Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Visual Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Social Cognition Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Trail Making Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Trail Making Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The BASC SC Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in BASC SC Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Fluency Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Fluency Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The WMS-III SS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in WMS-III SS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive BatteryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The LNS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in LNS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. The change from baseline in number of perseveration errors was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final CategoryBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of consecutive responses on the final category was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories CompletedBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of sorting categories achieved was assessed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B TestBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)Trail B is an instrument designed to assess set shifting. The patient was given a paper with numbers and letters on it and asked to connect them in an alternating manner (eg. 1-A-2-B-3C). The time required for the patient to complete the test was recorded. The change from Baseline to last observation following Baseline in the time necessary to complete the test is presented here.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch)to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 3.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in maximum activity to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in maximum activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to endpoint in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineAn actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 1An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 2An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 3An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total ActivityBaseline and Week 4An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total ScoresBaseline and Week 4 or last observation after baselineThe SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total ScoresBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global RatingBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ESS total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global RatingBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationn The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global RatingBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Endpoint which is Week 4 or the last observation following Baseline.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineWeek 4 or last observation following BaselineThe PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 or at the last observation following Baseline is presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoresBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationSANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoresBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationSANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationSANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale ScoreBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total ScoreBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationThe BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline in the total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationThe CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the total score.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale ScoreBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale ScoreBaseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administrationPANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total ScoreBaseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administrationThe Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total ScoreBaseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eleven centers in the United States (US). First participant enrolled: July 2007 / Last participant last visit: December 2007

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period of at least 1 week, a 4 week double blind treatment period, and a 1 week follow up period. Of the 60 patients enrolled, 59 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluated for safety; 1 patient who was assigned to receive placebo withdrew before taking any study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day
Patients took 4 tablets orally, once daily in the morning. The 4 tablets consumed consisted of one 50 mg active tablet of armodafinil and three placebo tablets. Patients remained at their randomized dosage for the duration of the study.
15
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day
Patients took 4 tablets orally, once daily in the morning. Treatment with study drug began at 50 mg/day (one 50 mg armodafinil tablet and three placebo tablets) and was titrated in a 50 mg increment to the randomized dosage of 100 mg/day (two 50 mg armodafinil tablets and two placebo tablets) on day 2. Patients remained at their randomized dosage for the duration of the study.
15
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day
Patients took 4 tablets orally, once daily in the morning. Treatment with study drug began at 50 mg/day (one 50 mg armodafinil tablet and three placebo tablets) and was titrated in 50 mg increments (an additional 50 mg armodafinil tablet and one less placebo tablet), as appropriate, on days 2, 4, and 6 to the randomized dosage of 200 mg/day (four 50 mg armodafinil tablets and no placebo tablets). Patients remained at their randomized dosage for the duration of the study.
15
Placebo
Placebo tablets matching the 50 mg armodafinil tablet were used in a manner identical to that of the armodafinil tablets for those patients administered placebo during the double blind treatment period.
15
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArmodafinil 100 mg/DayArmodafinil 200 mg/DayArmodafinil 50 mg/DayPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants60 Participants
Age Continuous40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.88
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants15 participants15 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants11 Participants11 Participants12 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 156 / 158 / 157 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 151 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represents the change from baseline to last observation after baseline in Composite T-Score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. If any part of the composite score was missing then the composite score was set to missing. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayMean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.22
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayMean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.98
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayMean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.06
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.81, 0.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.68, 0.86]ANCOVA
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.66, 0.95]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had at least one assessment by actigraphy after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity175906.8 CountsStandard Deviation 234098.9
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity45621.4 CountsStandard Deviation 112402.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity144855.3 CountsStandard Deviation 191836.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity38708.1 CountsStandard Deviation 132339.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment by actigraphy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-17.6 CountsStandard Deviation 25.81
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-0.7 CountsStandard Deviation 27.33
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity4.2 CountsStandard Deviation 27.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity0.8 CountsStandard Deviation 32.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in maximum activity to Endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had at least one assessment by actigraphy after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-124.3 CountsStandard Deviation 235.16
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-73.2 CountsStandard Deviation 284.32
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity70.4 CountsStandard Deviation 191.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-5.9 CountsStandard Deviation 267.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to endpoint in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had at least one assessment by actigraphy after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-5.1 CountsStandard Deviation 17.97
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-0.7 CountsStandard Deviation 25.68
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity6.0 CountsStandard Deviation 17.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-1.9 CountsStandard Deviation 20.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had at least one assessment by actigraphy after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity7037.0 CountsStandard Deviation 63882.86
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-9164.8 CountsStandard Deviation 75454.69
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity23631.1 CountsStandard Deviation 70519.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-24811.4 CountsStandard Deviation 95900.22
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had at least one assessment by actigraphy after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-41210.0 CountsStandard Deviation 97542.44
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-16150.5 CountsStandard Deviation 45645.34
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-5159.5 CountsStandard Deviation 25855.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-34443.8 CountsStandard Deviation 72427.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.28
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SCoRS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.76, 1]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SCoRS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.15, 0.48]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SCoRS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.61, 1.15]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1 in the ESS total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.05
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-1.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.64, 0.87]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.79, 0.74]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.11, 0.5]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.88, 0.63]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.72, 0.82]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.81]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity92077.4 CountsStandard Deviation 260737.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-28961.9 CountsStandard Deviation 96313.45
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity18639.8 CountsStandard Deviation 95180.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-118038 CountsStandard Deviation 388177.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch)to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-2.3 CountsStandard Deviation 43.02
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity8.9 CountsStandard Deviation 38.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity2.1 CountsStandard Deviation 31.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity0.8 CountsStandard Deviation 36.66
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in maximum activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-85.7 CountsStandard Deviation 312.58
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity14.8 CountsStandard Deviation 365.46
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity20.5 CountsStandard Deviation 436.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity6.2 CountsStandard Deviation 309.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-4.3 CountsStandard Deviation 20.75
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity7.6 CountsStandard Deviation 27.14
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity4.2 CountsStandard Deviation 23.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity1.7 CountsStandard Deviation 32.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity5913.6 CountsStandard Deviation 63868.75
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-3818.5 CountsStandard Deviation 78107.11
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity23665.1 CountsStandard Deviation 83030.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-12675.4 CountsStandard Deviation 118072.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity2419.5 CountsStandard Deviation 147029.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity37665.8 CountsStandard Deviation 124537.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity15892.7 CountsStandard Deviation 36649.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity1116.3 CountsStandard Deviation 100205.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.06, 0.46]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.87, 0.67]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [0.05, 1.74]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.82
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-4.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.27, 0.27]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.05, 0.5]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.51, 1.11]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the ESS total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.68
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.95, 0.65]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.87, 0.73]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.24, 0.38]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.13
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-4.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-6.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.11
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.44, 0.2]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.98, 0.62]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.97, 0.63]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-46326.7 CountsStandard Deviation 105330.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-44034.8 CountsStandard Deviation 120738.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-1954.7 CountsStandard Deviation 97046.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-78154.5 CountsStandard Deviation 367148.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-15.4 CountsStandard Deviation 27.93
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-7.9 CountsStandard Deviation 38.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-7.2 CountsStandard Deviation 30.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity13.1 CountsStandard Deviation 40.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in maximum activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-152.7 CountsStandard Deviation 244.27
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-146.3 CountsStandard Deviation 291.42
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity11.8 CountsStandard Deviation 282.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-28.4 CountsStandard Deviation 288.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-11.3 CountsStandard Deviation 23.14
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-6.6 CountsStandard Deviation 31.61
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-6.6 CountsStandard Deviation 21.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-0.3 CountsStandard Deviation 24.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity2346.8 CountsStandard Deviation 45862.44
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-32082.8 CountsStandard Deviation 91836.83
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity3103.1 CountsStandard Deviation 69263.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity30660.0 CountsStandard Deviation 111626.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-3534.2 CountsStandard Deviation 45509.04
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity27543.3 CountsStandard Deviation 89272.51
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity7937.0 CountsStandard Deviation 19889.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity27759.5 CountsStandard Deviation 100774.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.05, 0.55]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.52, 1.09]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.08, 1.58]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.05
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.32
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.92, 0.68]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.73, 0.87]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.77, 0.83]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

n The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose interviewers completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.21, 0.4]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.09, 0.52]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.51, 0.14]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-5.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.88
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.58, 1.24]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.91, 0.81]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.33, 0.45]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity40120.5 CountsStandard Deviation 151218.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity23748.0 CountsStandard Deviation 107713.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity61304.7 CountsStandard Deviation 158096.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-41751.7 CountsStandard Deviation 117072.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity1.5 CountsStandard Deviation 38.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity7.2 CountsStandard Deviation 29.11
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity9.9 CountsStandard Deviation 35.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-1.6 CountsStandard Deviation 25.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in maximum activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity1420.4 CountsStandard Deviation 345.81
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity1522.5 CountsStandard Deviation 558.66
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity1469.2 CountsStandard Deviation 440.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity1505.1 CountsStandard Deviation 356.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity5.2 CountsStandard Deviation 32.29
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-6.6 CountsStandard Deviation 29.58
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity15.2 CountsStandard Deviation 26.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity1.1 CountsStandard Deviation 26.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity39831.8 CountsStandard Deviation 115073.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity16850.4 CountsStandard Deviation 55047.52
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity56889.1 CountsStandard Deviation 83338.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity29067.5 CountsStandard Deviation 178423.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 3

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity89886.7 CountsStandard Deviation 58766.65
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity91057.2 CountsStandard Deviation 105129.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity126496.5 CountsStandard Deviation 71256.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity60259.0 CountsStandard Deviation 81898.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ESS total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-2.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.29
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.75, 0.86]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.99, 0.62]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.28, 0.34]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in composite T-score from baseline to 4 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had a MATRICS efficacy assessment at baseline and at Week 4. If any part of the composite score was missing then the composite score was set to missing. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.28
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.83]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.51, 1.14]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.66, 0.98]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.73
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-5.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.97
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-7.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.17
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.88, 0.72]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.88, 0.72]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.72, 0.89]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity7898.0 CountsStandard Deviation 71370.81
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-10300.1 CountsStandard Deviation 165816.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity123442.9 CountsStandard Deviation 168028.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-240840 CountsStandard Deviation 666800.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-15.4 CountsStandard Deviation 27.06
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity9.0 CountsStandard Deviation 34.81
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-0.4 CountsStandard Deviation 39.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity-18.7 CountsStandard Deviation 39.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in maximum activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-173.5 CountsStandard Deviation 371.31
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-61.4 CountsStandard Deviation 335.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity57.5 CountsStandard Deviation 218.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity-60.4 CountsStandard Deviation 286.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-7.9 CountsStandard Deviation 26.27
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity6.3 CountsStandard Deviation 30.62
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity7.4 CountsStandard Deviation 40.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity-7.6 CountsStandard Deviation 23.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity1341.8 CountsStandard Deviation 92122.95
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity12620.9 CountsStandard Deviation 88874.07
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity55151.0 CountsStandard Deviation 67614.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-24323.9 CountsStandard Deviation 104375.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in total activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who had an assessment by actigraphy at baseline and at Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-12493.6 CountsStandard Deviation 40759.54
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity-6742.8 CountsStandard Deviation 45841.91
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity39458.0 CountsStandard Deviation 36820.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity1744.3 CountsStandard Deviation 92667.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-3.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.78, 0.82]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.27, 1.36]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [0.7, 2.55]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.89
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.8]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.62, 0.98]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.16, 1.49]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose interviewers completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.78
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.06, 0.58]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.85, 0.75]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.9, 0.7]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-3.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores-2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.75, 1.1]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.98, 0.78]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.54, 1.27]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one baseline observation and one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-5.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.78
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-7.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores-6.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SANS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.71]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SANS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.06, 0.45]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the SANS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.68, 0.89]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Attention/Vigilance Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.89
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.02
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.56
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.03, 0.48]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.65, 0.88]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.97, 0.6]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The BASC SC Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in BASC SC Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.26
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery2.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery4.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.16, 0.37]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.21, 0.31]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.99, 0.58]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Fluency Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Fluency Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.81
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.83
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.3, 1.23]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.48, 1.04]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.64, 0.93]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The LNS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in LNS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.79
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.95, 0.56]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.11, 0.41]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.95, 0.62]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one baseline observation and one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.43
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score-3.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Negative Scale score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.65, 0.87]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Negative Scale score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.63, 0.88]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Negative Scale score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [0.78, 2.6]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.37, 1.15]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.81, 0.7]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.77]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose interviewers completed an efficacy assessment at least once after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.14, 0.38]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.89, 0.63]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.84, 0.73]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Social Cognition Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.62
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.79, -0.19]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.44, 0.11]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.82, 0.75]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Processing Speed Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.81
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery5.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.95
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.51, 1.01]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.86, 0.66]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.31, 1.28]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Trail Making Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Trail Making Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.15
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.76
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery9.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.3, 1.23]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.68, 0.83]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [0, 1.63]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test

Trail B is an instrument designed to assess set shifting. The patient was given a paper with numbers and letters on it and asked to connect them in an alternating manner (eg. 1-A-2-B-3C). The time required for the patient to complete the test was recorded. The change from Baseline to last observation following Baseline in the time necessary to complete the test is presented here.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test-8.7 MinutesStandard Deviation 41.45
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test17.5 MinutesStandard Deviation 56.31
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test-20.8 MinutesStandard Deviation 61.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test-27.6 MinutesStandard Deviation 40.92
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the Trails B Test score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.22, 0.33]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the Trails B Test score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.69, -0.08]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the Trails B Test score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.95, 0.7]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Verbal Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.93
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.61, 0.9]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.5, 1.01]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.34, 1.25]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Visual Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.84
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.15
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.33, 1.23]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.42, 1.1]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.68, 0.93]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The WMS-III SS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in WMS-III SS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.21
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.67
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.99, 0.52]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.42, 1.1]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.72, 0.85]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed

WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of sorting categories achieved was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed0.0 Categories CompletedStandard Deviation 1.36
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed0.5 Categories CompletedStandard Deviation 1.85
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed-0.3 Categories CompletedStandard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed0.2 Categories CompletedStandard Deviation 0.72
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.92, 0.63]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.54, 1.04]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.12, 0.49]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category

WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of consecutive responses on the final category was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category-1.6 ResponsesStandard Deviation 2.98
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category-0.5 ResponsesStandard Deviation 4.46
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category0.3 ResponsesStandard Deviation 2.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category0.7 ResponsesStandard Deviation 3.8
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.43, 0.15]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.05, 0.53]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.9, 0.7]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors

WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. The change from baseline in number of perseveration errors was assessed.

Time frame: 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors1.6 ErrorsStandard Deviation 5.35
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors-8.0 ErrorsStandard Deviation 12.79
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors-2.2 ErrorsStandard Deviation 11.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors-1.9 ErrorsStandard Deviation 7.77
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.3, 0.27]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.25, 1.35]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.78, 0.82]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Working Memory Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who had at least 1 MATRICS efficacy assessment after baseline. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.51
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.08, 0.44]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.77, 0.74]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil treatment in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the composite score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.89, 0.68]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or last observation following baseline) in the ESS total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one baseline observation and one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.87
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the ESS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.51, 1.01]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the ESS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.73, 0.78]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the ESS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-1.01, 0.56]
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one baseline observation and one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.56
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score-1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.89
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Total score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.64, 0.87]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Negative Scale score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.87, 0.64]
Comparison: This study was not designed for hypothesis testing, but to gather information relative to the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Inferential statistics were not performed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals of the effect sizes for the change from baseline in the PANSS Negative Scale score are provided for each armodafinil treated group compared with placebo. Actual changes from baseline are summarized using descriptive statistics.95% CI: [-0.08, 1.54]
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Baseline

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineBorderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineModerately ill4 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMildly ill11 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineModerately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineBorderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMildly ill8 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineModerately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineBorderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineBorderline ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineNormal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineModerately ill2 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineMildly ill11 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Borderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Markedly ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Mildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Moderately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Moderately ill2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Borderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Mildly ill11 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Borderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Mildly ill8 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Moderately ill2 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Normal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Mildly ill11 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Normal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Borderline ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Moderately ill1 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Markedly ill1 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1Severely ill0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Mildly ill9 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Moderately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Borderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Borderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Mildly ill8 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Moderately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Borderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Mildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Moderately ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Severely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Normal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Severely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Markedly ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Borderline ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Mildly ill11 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2Moderately ill1 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Mildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Borderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Moderately ill2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Mildly ill8 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Normal0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Moderately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Borderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Moderately ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Mildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Borderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Markedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Severely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Normal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Moderately ill1 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Severely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Mildly ill11 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Among the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Normal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Markedly ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4Borderline ill0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Endpoint which is Week 4 or the last observation following Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Full analysis set defined as the number of subjects who had at least one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineBorderline ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMildly ill11 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineModerately ill3 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineModerately ill5 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineBorderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMildly ill8 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNormal0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineBorderline ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMildly ill10 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineModerately ill1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineModerately ill2 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMildly ill11 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineSeverely ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineBorderline ill0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNormal0 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMarkedly ill0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 1 is presented here.

Time frame: Week 1

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1No change9 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1No change10 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally improved0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally improved6 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1No change2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1No change4 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Very much improved1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much improved3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally improved4 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Minimally worse1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1Much worse0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 2 is presented here.

Time frame: Week 2

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2No change5 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much improved3 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally improved3 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2No change6 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much improved3 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally improved5 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2No change2 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much improved4 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2No change3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much improved3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Very much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2Minimally improved2 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 is presented here.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and who completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4No change0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much improved3 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally improved7 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally improved4 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4No change4 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally improved6 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4No change0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much improved4 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally improved5 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Very much improved3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4Minimally worse1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4No change1 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 or at the last observation following Baseline is presented.

Time frame: Week 4 or last observation following Baseline

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who have at least one observation after Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNo change0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally improved9 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch improved3 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNo change5 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch improved2 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally improved4 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch improved1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally worse1 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much improved4 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch worse0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNo change0 Participants
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally improved6 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineNo change2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much improved3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally improved5 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMinimally worse1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following BaselineMuch worse0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 1. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 2. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

Population: Full analysis set defined as subjects who received one or more doses of the study drug and whose clinician completed an efficacy assessment at week 4. Summary statistics are provided for the observed data only, missing data was not estimated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Safety Analysis Set defined as subjects who had at least one dose of study medication and an observation at baseline and at least one observation after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Safety Analysis Set defined as subjects who had at least one dose of study medication and an observation at baseline and at least one observation after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.34
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline in the total score.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Safety Analysis Set defined as subjects who had at least one dose of study medication and an observation at baseline and at least one observation after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

Population: Safety Analysis Set defined as subjects who had at least one dose of study medication and an observation at baseline and at least one observation after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armodafinil 50 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Armodafinil 100 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Armodafinil 200 mg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026