Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab Induction Therapy, Administered Subcutaneously, in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00487539
Enrollment
1065
Registered
2007-06-18
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2014-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colitis, Ulcerative

Keywords

Colitis, Ulcerative, Golimumab, CNTO 148

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects (good and bad) of golimumab (CNTO 148) therapy in participants with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Detailed description

This is a multi-center (conducted in more than one center), randomized (study medication assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the physician nor the participant know about the study medication), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (a medical research study comparing the response in 2 or more groups of participants receiving different interventions) study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab in participants with moderately to severely active UC. There are 2 parts in this study. Part 1 is Phase 2 dose-ranging portion of study. Participants enrolled in Part 1, will receive subcutaneous (under the skin by way of a needle) injections of placebo, golimumab 100 milligram (mg), 200 mg, or 400 mg at Week 0, followed by subcutaneous injections of placebo, golimumab 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg respectively at Week 2. Part 2 is Phase 3 dose-confirming portion of study and newly enrolled participants will receive same doses studied in Part 1, until the doses for Part 2 are selected. At the time that the final doses are selected, all newly enrolled participants will receive 1 of the selected doses or matching placebo. At Week 6, participants will be asked to participate in an additional 1-year maintenance study. Participants not entering the 1-year golimumab maintenance study will be evaluated for safety 16 weeks after last administration of study agent. The duration of study will be 6 weeks for participants who enter the 1-year golimumab maintenance study and 16 weeks after last administration of study agent for participants who do not enter the 1-year golimumab maintenance study. Efficacy of the participants will primarily be evaluated by clinical response at Week 6. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo subcutaneous injection (given under the skin by way of a needle) matching to golimumab administered at Week 0 and Week 2.

Golimumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection administered at Week 0 for Golimumab 100 mg -\> 50 mg arm group and at Week 2 for Golimumab 200 mg -\> 100 mg arm group.

Golimumab 200 mg subcutaneous injection administered at Week 0 for Golimumab 200 mg -\> 100 mg arm group and at Week 2 for Golimumab 400 mg -\> 200 mg arm group.

BIOLOGICALGolimumab 400 mg

Golimumab 400 mg subcutaneous injection administered at Week 0 for Golimumab 400 mg -\> 200 mg arm group.

BIOLOGICALGolimumab 50 mg

Golimumab 50 mg subcutaneous injection administered at Week 2 for Golimumab 100 mg -\> 50 mg arm group.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants diagnosed with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) defined by a Mayo score of 6 to 12 inclusive at Baseline (Week 0), including an endoscopic (examination of an internal part of the body with a lighted tube; looking at a part of the body with a lighted tube) subscore of greater than or equal to 2 * Participants must have biopsy results (collected at the screening endoscopy (procedure or obtained within the last year) consistent with the diagnosis of UC * Participants either currently receiving treatment with, or have a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral 5-aminosalicylate, oral corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine * Participants with current dependency or with a history of corticosteroid dependency (i.e., an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC) * Not have a diagnosis of active tuberculosis * Participants with negative stool test for enteric (by way of the intestines) pathogens

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with prior exposure to biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents * Participants with severe extensive UC that is likely to require a colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) within 12 weeks of study entry * Participants having UC limited to the rectum only or to less than 20 centimeter of the colon * Presence of a stoma (an artificial permanent opening especially in the abdominal wall made in surgical procedures) or presence of a fistula * Participants with a history of extensive colonic resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Baseline, Week 6Clinical response is defined as decrease from baseline in Mayo score by greater than or equal to 30 percent and greater than or equal to 3, with either a decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding sub-score of greater than or equal to 1 or a rectal bleeding sub-score of 0 or 1. The Mayo score is sum of 4 sub-scores (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and physician's global assessment); each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total Mayo score value ranges from 0 to 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 6Week 6Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of less than or equal to 2, with no individual sub-score greater than 1. The Mayo score is sum of 4 sub-scores (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and physician's global assessment); each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total Mayo score value ranges from 0 to 12.
Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 6Week 6Mucosal healing is determined from the endoscopy sub-score of the Mayo score. Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy sub-score of 0 or 1. Higher score indicates higher severity of disease. Endoscopy sub-score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease; spontaneous bleeding and ulceration).
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Baseline to Week 6The IBDQ is used to measure disease specific quality of life on a 32 Likert-scaled items questionnaire. The IBDQ scale contains 4 component subscales: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function with scores ranging from 10 to 70, 5 to 35, 12 to 84 and 5 to 35 respectively and the total score ranges from 32 to 224. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Japan, Lithuania, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned to Placebo, Golimumab 100 mg-\>50 mg, Golimumab 200 mg-\>100 mg and Golimumab 400 mg-\>200 mg groups for dose selection. Efficacy results were reported for only newly enrolled participants assigned to Placebo, Golimumab 200 mg-\>100 mg and Golimumab 400 mg-\>200 mg groups after dose-selection as per planned analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo subcutaneous injection (given under the skin by way of a needle) matched to golimumab administered at Week 0 and Week 2.
331
Golimumab 100 mg -> 50 mg
Golimumab 100 milligram (mg) subcutaneous injection was administered at Week 0 and dose was decreased to 50 mg at Week 2.
72
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mg
Golimumab 200 mg subcutaneous injection was administered at Week 0 and dose was decreased to 100 mg at Week 2.
331
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mg
Golimumab 400 mg subcutaneous injection was administered at Week 0 and dose was decreased to 200 mg at Week 2.
331
Total1,065

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3211
Overall StudyOther3122
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect1001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboGolimumab 100 mg -> 50 mgGolimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgGolimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgTotal
Age, Continuous39 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.04
40.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.19
40 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.54
40.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
40 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.37
Sex: Female, Male
Female
156 Participants32 Participants151 Participants130 Participants469 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
175 Participants40 Participants180 Participants201 Participants596 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
61 / 33018 / 7154 / 33155 / 332
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 3303 / 7110 / 33115 / 332

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6

Clinical response is defined as decrease from baseline in Mayo score by greater than or equal to 30 percent and greater than or equal to 3, with either a decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding sub-score of greater than or equal to 1 or a rectal bleeding sub-score of 0 or 1. The Mayo score is sum of 4 sub-scores (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and physician's global assessment); each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total Mayo score value ranges from 0 to 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all the participants who were randomly assigned to the study after the dose selection.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 676 Participants
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6129 Participants
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6141 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6

The IBDQ is used to measure disease specific quality of life on a 32 Likert-scaled items questionnaire. The IBDQ scale contains 4 component subscales: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function with scores ranging from 10 to 70, 5 to 35, 12 to 84 and 5 to 35 respectively and the total score ranges from 32 to 224. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all the participants who were randomly assigned to the study after the dose selection. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Baseline129.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 32.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Change at Week 614.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 31.25
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Baseline131.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 33.93
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Change at Week 627.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 33.72
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Baseline127.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 33.9
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgChange From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 6Change at Week 626.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 34.28
p-value: <0.0001ANOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 6

Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of less than or equal to 2, with no individual sub-score greater than 1. The Mayo score is sum of 4 sub-scores (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and physician's global assessment); each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total Mayo score value ranges from 0 to 12.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all the participants who were randomly assigned to the study after the dose selection.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 616 Participants
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 645 Participants
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 646 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 6

Mucosal healing is determined from the endoscopy sub-score of the Mayo score. Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy sub-score of 0 or 1. Higher score indicates higher severity of disease. Endoscopy sub-score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease; spontaneous bleeding and ulceration).

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all the participants who were randomly assigned to the study after the dose selection.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 672 Participants
Golimumab 200 mg -> 100 mgNumber of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 6107 Participants
Golimumab 400 mg -> 200 mgNumber of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 6116 Participants
p-value: 0.0014Chi-squared
p-value: 0.0001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026