Skip to content

Effect of Timing on Efficacy of Morphine Analgesia After 2-chloroprocaine Anesthesia

Interaction Between Epidural 2-chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine: Effect of Timing on Efficacy of Morphine Analgesia After 2-chloroprocaine Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00487084
Enrollment
136
Registered
2007-06-15
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2014-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia, Epidural, Labor

Keywords

analgesia, tubal ligation, chloroprocaine

Brief summary

Epidural chloroprocaine is often used in obstetrical anesthesia because of its fast onset and short duration. These properties make it an ideal drug to use for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation. When epidural morphine is given after chloroprocaine, there is a decreased efficacy of analgesia as compared to lidocaine (1). Several studies have hypothesized a specific opioid receptor mediated antagonism of chloroprocaine (2,3). Karambelkar raised the question whether this decreased efficacy is due to a disparity between the time the chloroprocaine anesthesia resolves and the onset of epidural morphine analgesia, resulting in a time window of pain (2). The duration of action of epidural 2-CP anesthesia is 30-45 minutes and the onset of epidural morphine analgesia is 60-70 minutes, therefore the regression of sensory blockade before the onset of the morphine analgesia could result in a window of pain (2). Hess and colleagues studied epidural morphine analgesia and women who had a Cesarean delivery under spinal bupivacaine anesthesia (3). Subjects were randomized to receive epidural 2-CP and morphine or epidural saline and morphine. There was no difference in postoperative analgesia between the two groups (3 and personal communication, Dr. Philip Hess). A literature search cross referencing epidural chloroprocaine, using Pub Med, did not produce any articles comparing epidural morphine given before the procedure (in an attempt to time the onset of analgesia with the resolution of chloroprocaine anesthesia) to the standard administration time after the procedure.

Detailed description

Women undergoing post partum tubal ligation with an epidural in-situ will be randomly double blindedly selected into one of three groups for pain control. The groups are epidural 1) epidural morphine-chloroprocaine 2) epidural chloroprocaine-morphine 3) epidural morphine-lidocaine. Groups 1 and 3 will receive morphine 30 minutes prior to local anesthetic dosing followed by saline placebo after local dosing. Group 2 will receive placebo 30 minutes prior to local anesthetic dosing followed by epidural morphine. Pain scores and supplemental analgesic requirements will be evaluated 30 minutes, 1hr, 2hr, 4hr and every 4 hrs for the first 24hrs.

Interventions

DRUGMorphine-CP-saline (MCS)

3mg of preservative free morphine will be administered epidurally 30 min prior to epidural anesthesia. Epidural 3% 2CP will be used to achieve a T4 dermatomal level for surgical anesthesia for PPTL. 6ml of epidural saline will be administered at skin incision

DRUGsaline-2CP-morphine (SCM)

6ml of saline will be administered epidurally 30 min prior to epidural anesthesia. Epidural 3% 2CP will be used to achieve a T4 dermatomal level for surgical anesthesia for PPTL. 3mg of preservative free morphine will be administered at skin incision

DRUGsaline-lidocaine-morphine (SLM)

3mg of preservative free morphine will be administered epidurally 30 min prior to epidural anesthesia. Epidural 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 will be used to achieve a T4 dermatomal level for surgical anesthesia for PPTL. 6ml of epidural saline will be administered at skin incision

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with an epidural catheter in situ for labor analgesia, status post a vaginal delivery, and scheduled for a postpartum tubal ligation under epidural anesthesia will be eligible

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy/hypersensitivity to morphine * Allergy/hypersensitivity to ester-linked local anesthetics or para-amino benzoic acid (PABA) * Body Mass Index \>40 kg/m2 * Patients using chronic opioids * History of obstructive sleep apnea * Any contraindication to epidural anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Continuing Analgesia48 hoursTime to first request for supplemental analgesia
Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes90 minParticipants requesting supplemental analgesia in the first 90 minutes following study drug

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)At recovery room entryVerbal Rating Pain Score (VRPS) at time of post-anesthesia recovery room entry, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable
Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours48 hoursParticipants requesting supplemental analgesia in first 48 hours

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

136 subjects approached and assessed for eligibility

Pre-assignment details

Excluded from randomization (n=37), 26 refused to participate, 11 did not meet exclusion criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)
morphine will be administered 30 min prior to epidural anesthesia; 2CP will be used to achieve a T4 level; saline will be administered at skin incision
33
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)
saline will be administered 30 min prior to epidural anesthesia; 2-chloroprocaine will be used to achieve a T4 level; morphine will be administered at skin incision
33
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)
Saline administered 30 minutes prior to lidocaine to achieve a T4 anesthesia level. Morphine administered at skin incision.
33
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDid not receive intervention435

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
33 Participants33 Participants33 Participants99 Participants
Age, Continuous31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Region of Enrollment
United States
33 participants33 participants33 participants99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants33 Participants33 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 300 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 300 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Continuing Analgesia

Time to first request for supplemental analgesia

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: All participants receiving the intervention were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)Duration of Continuing Analgesia28.6 hours
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)Duration of Continuing Analgesia2.2 hours
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)Duration of Continuing Analgesia25.8 hours
Comparison: A sample of 56 was estimated to have an 80% power to detect a 30% difference in the proportion of subjects with continuing analgesia in the MCS versus the SCM groups when 50% of the subjects in the SCM had requested supplemental analgesia. 28 subjects was added to compare the influence of time of morphine and 2-chloroprocaine administration to lidocaine-morphine analgesia. The primary outcome was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test.p-value: 0.006Log Rank
p-value: 0.83Log Rank
p-value: 0.009Log Rank
Primary

Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes

Participants requesting supplemental analgesia in the first 90 minutes following study drug

Time frame: 90 min

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes0 participants
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes10 participants
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes0 participants
p-value: 0.01Chi-squared, Corrected
p-value: 0.01Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours

Participants requesting supplemental analgesia in first 48 hours

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours12 Participants
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours8 Participants
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours12 Participants
p-value: 0.2Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)

Verbal Rating Pain Score (VRPS) at time of post-anesthesia recovery room entry, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable

Time frame: At recovery room entry

Population: Verbal Rating Score for Pain (0-10) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)2 Scores on a scale
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)2 Scores on a scale
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)0 Scores on a scale
p-value: <0.05Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: <0.05Kruskal-Wallis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026