Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

The signal knee was chosen prior to randomization based on which knee met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The JSW is the space measured in mm between the 2 bones in the knee joint and this is assessed by x-ray. The JSW decreases with disease progression. The lower limit for participation in the trial were 2 mm JSW. There were no upper limit as long as inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The outcome was measured as a change in JSW from baseline to month 24.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 months

Population: The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.

WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the degree of difficulty for performing each daily function listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no difficulty (best), 100 is extreme difficulty (worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 1700. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less difficulty).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 months

Population: The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.

WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the pain associated with performing each daily activity listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no pain (best), 100 is extreme pain (Worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 500. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less pain).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 months

Population: The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.

The central laboratory analyzed serum CTX-I (S-Crosslaps, Elecsys) and osteocalcin as well as urine CTX-I/creatinine and CTX-II/creatinine. It was originally planned that serum CTX-II would be measured, but this was not done.

Time frame: From Baseline to Month 24

Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed in some rows differs from the overall number analyzed due to missing values from patients who prematurely discontinued.

Disease progression in the signal knee (cartilage volume and thickness) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania using a quality controlled low-field 0.18T C-Span scanner from Esaote dedicated to the imaging of extremities. The same solenoid coil was used for all patients at a given site.

Time frame: From Baseline to Month 24

Population: MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania.

To assess disease progression of OA affected joints, X-rays of both hands were performed & assessed by two central readers (at Synarc). Hand OA was assessed by calculating total score for osteophytes, cyst erosion, & joint space narrowing, each of which were based on sum of left and right hand X-ray analysis with possible scores of 0-66. The overall total score (possible range 0-198) was also used. Higher scores (closer to 66 or to 198 when using overall total score) imply a worse outcome. Hand analyses were based on double readings, and the mean was used in the analyses. The AUStralian/CANadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaire was also used for assessment of hand OA. It measures pain (5 questions), stiffness (1 question) and difficulties with daily activities (9 questions) through a visual analogue scale (0-100mm; 0 = lowest score; 100 = highest score). Lower AUSCAN scores represent a better outcome. Change (from baseline to month 24) in these scores was calculated.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: About 15% of the ITT population had hand OA at baseline and only these subjects were included in the X-ray assessments.The AUSCAN questionnaire was administered to all the patients at sites in Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania.

Adverse events were by system organ class of all patients.

Time frame: From Baseline to Month 24

Population: ITT population. A patient with multiple occurrences of a TEAE under one treatment is counted only once in the AE category for that treatment.