Skip to content

Comparison of Intramuscular Olanzapine and Intramuscular Haloperidol in Patients With Schizophrenia

A Double-Blind Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intramuscular Olanzapine and Intramuscular Haloperidol in Acutely Agitated Patients With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00485901
Enrollment
50
Registered
2007-06-13
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2005-01-31
Last updated
2007-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare intramuscular Olanzapine and intramuscular Haloperidol in changing of agitation in patients with schizophrenia

Interventions

DRUGHaloperidol

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients, between the ages of 18 and 65 * Patients must have diagnosis of schizophrenia that meets disease diagnostic criteria as defined in DSM-IV * Patients must be considered, by the investigator, to be clinically agitated and appropriate candidates for treatment with IM medication. Investigator must believe that it is safe to administer IM olanzapine and IM comparator to the patients with respect to the safety profile of these drugs (including the anticholinergic properties of Olanzapine IM or the comparator agent) * Subjects' illness must not, in the opinion of the investigator, be caused by substance abuse * Patient must be hospitalized during the study

Exclusion criteria

* Previous participation (treatment with study drug) in a Lilly sponsored intra-muscular olanzapine clinical trial * Serious, unstable illnesses such that death is anticipated within 1 year or intensive care unit hospitalization for the disease is anticipated within 6 months * Have a known diagnosis of dementia of any type, as defined in the DSM-IV or DSM-IV-TR * Documented history of allergic reaction to study medication(s) * Treatment with an injectable depot neuroleptic within 1 injection interval prior to study drug administration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the efficacy of IM olanzapine compared with IM haloperidol in changing of agitation from baseline to 2 hours post-first IM injection

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess treatment-emergent adverse events, change in vital signs and extrapyramidal symptoms of IM olanzapine versus IM haloperidol during the study
Assess the efficacy of IM olanzapine compared with IM haloperidol from baseline to 15 min, 30 min, 60 min and 120 minutes post-first IM injection
Compare the response rates and time to response during the 2 hours post-first IM injection.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026