Skip to content

Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Raltegravir in HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)-Infected Children and Adolescents

A Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-Label, Noncomparative Study of the International Maternal, Pediatric, Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) Group to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of Raltegravir (Isentress, MK-0518) in HIV-1 Infected Children and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00485264
Enrollment
153
Registered
2007-06-12
Start date
2007-09-17
Completion date
2017-05-18
Last updated
2021-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

Integrase is 1 of 3 HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)-1 enzymes required for viral replication. Raltegravir is a drug that prevents integrase from working properly. This drug has been tested for safety and efficacy in adults, but this is the first study to examine raltegravir in children and adolescents. The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate dose for raltegravir across the pediatric age range from 4 weeks to 18 years of age, by acquiring short and long term safety data, intensive and population pharmacokinetic (PK) data, and efficacy experience with raltegravir in HIV-infected children and adolescents.

Detailed description

Integrase is one of three enzymes necessary for HIV replication. Integrase allows for the integration of HIV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) into the human genome. Raltegravir is a strong and selective inhibitor of HIV integrase. In adults, raltegravir has shown significant antiretroviral activity in clinical trials and is well tolerated. The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate dose for raltegravir across the pediatric age range from 4 weeks (30 days) to 18 years of age, by acquiring short and long term safety data, intensive and population PK data, and efficacy experience with raltegravir in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected children and adolescents. The study consisted of two sequential Stages: I and II. The dose finding period of Stage I was intended to examine the pharmacokinetics and short term tolerability and safety of raltegravir in a limited number of participants to permit dose selection for further study in Stage II. The dose finding algorithm required a preliminary assessment of data from the first 4 patients of each cohort (termed a mini-cohort). Failure to meet PK targets required dose adjustments, contingent upon the mini-cohort's dose having met safety criteria, followed by reassessment of safety and PK data from the new mini-cohort dose. When a mini-cohort dose had passed both safety and PK criteria, further accrual to and an assessment of results from the full cohort could occur. Again, failure to meet PK targets required dose adjustments contingent upon the full cohort's dose having met safety criteria with subsequent PK and safety evaluation of data from a new cohort taking the new dose. Chronic dosing, which includes Stage I extension (the period after Stage I dose finding) and Stage II (additional participants enrolled), was intended to provide longer term safety and antiviral activity data in a larger sample of participants. Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all patients received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts. This group is denoted as the Final Dose Population, and results from this group are considered primary, since they reflect only the age-specific doses proposed for commercial use. The group with all participants exposed to raltegravir (at any dose) is denoted as the All Treated Population. Stage I lasted for a minimum of 48 weeks, Stage II was for 48 weeks, and a long-term follow-up period lasted for 5 years from initial exposure (i.e., 48 weeks of treatment plus 4 years of follow-up). Participants were stratified by age and assigned to one of six cohorts. Participants in Cohort I were between the ages of 12 and 18 years and received poloxamer film coated raltegravir tablets. Participants in Cohort IIA were between the ages of 6 and 11 years, weighed at least 25 kg, and received poloxamer film coated raltegravir tablets. Participants in Cohort IIB were between the ages of 6 and 11 years and received chewable raltegravir tablets. Participants in Cohort III were between the ages of 2 and 5 years and received chewable raltegravir tablets. Participants in Cohort IV were between the ages of 6 months (defined as 180 days) and 23 months and received oral granules for suspension. Participants in Cohort V were between the ages of 4 weeks (defined as 30 days) and 5 months and received oral granules for suspension. Enrollment for Stage I of this study began with Cohort I and progressed to the other cohorts once preliminary dosage had been determined and safety data were reviewed. When this information had been determined for Cohort I, Cohorts IIA and IIB began enrollment. Once safety and dose data for these cohorts were reviewed, enrollment into Cohort III began. Once safety and dose data for Cohort III were reviewed, enrollment into Cohort IV began and once safety and dose data for Cohort IV were reviewed, enrollment into Cohort V began. During Stage II of this study, participants took raltegravir at the dosage determined as safe and reaching PK targets based on the the Stage I data. The purpose of Stage II was to determine long-term safety of raltegravir once a safe dose meeting PK targets has been determined. Participants whose Stage I dose was different from the dose determined for Stage II and who had not had individual dose adjustments because of extreme PK values had their raltegravir dose changed to the selected Stage II dose once it was determined. If individualizing the dose for participants in this manner resulted in a dose increase, these participants had an additional safety visit 4 weeks after the dose modification, and then continued on study visits with no further changes in the visit schedule. There were at least 9 study visits for participants in this study, occurring during the 48-week raltegravir treatment period. For participants who completed 48 weeks of study and appeared to have benefited from receiving study drug, raltegravir was provided until five years after initial raltegravir exposure. For participants who opted to continue on study-provided raltegravir, extended provision of drug was implemented as part of a protocol extension involving visits every 4 months for five years after initial raltegravir exposure. Participants who did not continue on study-provided raltegravir were followed with annual visits for five years after initial raltegravir exposure (i.e. 48 weeks of raltegravir treatment plus 4 years follow-up). At each visit, a physical exam, blood collection, and determination of treatment adherence occurred. At some visits, urine collection and Tanner staging occurred. Selected cohorts underwent a taste evaluation at 1 of 2 visits. Participants aged 2 to less than 6 years of age were asked to participate in an additional PK substudy in which blood was collected two times over a 12-hour visit (or, if more convenient, this assessment may have been completed in 2 separate visits) in order to collect additional Cmin PK data. Participants were re-registered into the same cohort if a dose change was recommended. Current pediatric Food and Drug Administration approval and dosing recommendations are based upon evaluations in 122 Final Dose participants aged ≥4 weeks to 18 years enrolled in this study. The results present safety and efficacy results of the complete 5 year follow up data (primary and key secondary endpoints) of the participants from IMPAACT P1066, the Final Dose Population. By the date on which most of the data were frozen, 24 July 2017, all participants enrolled had Week 24 data (i.e., had either completed the Week 24 visit, or, for those who discontinued before Week 24, had the potential to have experienced the Week 24 visit), had also completed (or had the potential to have experienced) the Week 48 visit, and had either completed 240 weeks of study and were subsequently taken off study, or had prematurely discontinued study and were no longer in follow up.

Interventions

DRUGRaltegravir poloxamer film coated tablet

Final Selected Dose: 400-mg tablet taken orally twice daily.

Final Selected Dose: Weight based dose of \ 6 mg/kg according to the dosing table, to a maximum dose of 300 mg, taken orally twice daily.

DRUGRaltegravir oral granules for suspension (20 mg/mL)

Weight based dose of \ 6 mg/kg orally every 12 hours according to dosing table in protocol or the dose determined by review of all available data.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Days to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for All Participants: * Documentation of HIV-1 infection, defined as positive results from two samples collected at different time points. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. * For participants in Cohorts I, IIA, IIB, and III: On unchanged therapeutic regimen for at least 12 weeks, or treatment experienced (not including therapy to interrupt maternal-to-child-transmission (MTCT)) but on no treatment for 4 or more weeks prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. * Participants in Cohorts IV must have received therapy to either interrupt MTCT and/or to treat HIV infection and participants in Cohort V must have received therapy to interrupt MTCT but have not received other anti-HIV therapies. * HIV RNA (ribonucleic acid) of 1,000 copies/mL or greater at screening * Demonstrated ability or willingness to take assigned raltegravir preparation * Parent or legal guardian or participant able and willing to provide signed informed consent when applicable * Female participants who are sexually active and potentially able to become pregnant must use two methods of birth control while on study and for 3 months after stopping study drug. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. Male participants must not participate in sperm donation programs. Male participants engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy must use a condom. * Willing to be re-registered within same cohort if a dose change is recommended

Exclusion criteria

for All Participants: * Known Grade 3 or higher of any of the following laboratory tests within 30 days prior to study entry: neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lipase, serum creatinine * Clinical evidence of pancreatitis * Treatment for active tuberculosis (TB) infection or disease. * History of lactic acidosis in 3 months prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. * Diagnosis of new Centers for Disease Control Stage C criteria or opportunistic or bacterial infection diagnosed within 30 days prior to study screening and not considered clinically stable * Prior treatment with another experimental HIV integrase inhibitor * Immunosuppressive therapy within 30 days prior to beginning raltegravir study treatment. Participants taking short courses of corticosteroids are not excluded. * Current or anticipated use of any disallowed medications, listed in the protocol. * Any history of malignancy * Participants who are unlikely to adhere to the study procedures or keep appointments * Participants who are planning to relocate during study * Any clinically significant diseases (other than HIV) or findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the outcome of the study * Current or past participation in an investigational study with a compound or device that is not commercially available within 30 days of signing informed consent * Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Infants who are receiving breastmilk are allowed to enroll. * For participants in Cohorts IV and V, participant's caregiver is unable to access clean water supply (as defined by local standards) to re-suspend raltegravir oral granules

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Plasma concentration at 12 hours postdose (C12h) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)From study entry through Week 24Adverse events were graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table, Version 1.0. All grade 3 and higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.
Number of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study MedicationFrom study entry through Week 24The attribution of relationship of serious adverse events to study drug for the purposes of employing the start, stop and pause rules was by consensus among the site investigator, study team (which includes representatives from Merck) and the Division of AIDS medical officer; if unanimous agreement between them cannot be established, the attribution made by the majority of these 3 persons or entities will be used. Gradation of relationship will use the following terminology: Not related, Probably not related, Possibly related, Probably related or Definitely related.
Number of Participants Who DiedFrom study entry through Week 24Number of participants who died were summarized.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). AUC12h (area-under-the-curve from 0 to 12 hours) were determined using the linear-log trapezoidal rule.
PK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.
PK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Time to half of maximum plasma concentration Cmax (T1/2) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study MedicationFrom study entry through Week 48The attribution of relationship of serious adverse events to study drug for the purposes of employing the start, stop and pause rules was by consensus among the site investigator, study team (which includes representatives from Merck) and the Division of AIDS medical officer; if unanimous agreement between them cannot be established, the attribution made by the majority of these 3 persons or entities will be used. Gradation of relationship will use the following terminology: Not related, Probably not related, Possibly related, Probably related or Definitely related.
Number of Participants Who DiedFrom study entry through Week 48Number of participants who died were summarized.
Percentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline, Week 24, 48Plasma HIV RNA concentrations were determined at entry and at regular intervals using the HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5 (Roche Molecular Diagnostics) or RealTime HIV-1 (Abbott Molecular), and analyses used the Observed Failure Approach.
Change of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline, Week 24, 48Change in CD4 cell count from baseline was calculated as the value at later visit minus the value at baseline.
Change of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline, Week 24, 48Change in CD4 percent from baseline was calculated as the value of the later visit minus the value at baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)From study entry through Week 48Adverse events were graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table, Version 1.0. All grade 3 and higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.

Countries

Argentina, Botswana, Brazil, Puerto Rico, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort I
Participants between the ages of 12 and 18 years; receiving raltegravir poloxamer film coated tablet; final selected dose: 400-mg tablet taken orally twice daily.
71
Cohort IIA
Participants between the ages of 6 and 11 years; receiving raltegravir poloxamer film coated tablet: final selected dose: 400-mg tablet taken orally twice daily for participants weighing at least 25 kg.
16
Cohort IIB
Participants between the ages of 6 and 11 years; receiving raltegravir chewable tablet: final selected dose: Weight based dose of \ 6 mg/kg to a maximum dose of 300 mg, taken orally twice daily.
18
Cohort III
Participants between the ages of 2 and 5 years; receiving raltegravir chewable tablet: final selected dose: Weight based dose of \ 6 mg/kg to a maximum dose of 300 mg, taken orally twice daily.
21
Cohort IV
Participants between the ages of 6 and 23 months; receiving raltegravir oral granules for suspension (20 mg/mL): Stage I starting dose of 6 mg/kg orally twice daily according to dosing table in protocol or the dose determined by review of all available data.
14
Cohort V
Participants between the ages of 4 weeks and 5 months; receiving raltegravir oral granules for suspension (20 mg/mL): Stage I starting dose of 6 mg/kg orally twice daily according to dosing table in protocol or the dose determined by review of all available data..
12
Total152

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event102313
Overall StudyDeath100010
Overall StudyDisallowed Medication000001
Overall StudyEnrolled But Not Given Treatment000010
Overall StudyGuardian Consent Withdrawn100010
Overall StudyIntolerance/Unable to Tolerate Dose001000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy010000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up211001
Overall StudyNon-Compliant1721010
Overall StudyNot Able to Attend Clinic500112
Overall StudyNumber/Volume/Timing of Study Meds211000
Overall StudyOther Reason300000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision020000
Overall StudyPregnancy400000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort IIBCohort IIATotalCohort VCohort IVCohort IIICohort I
Age, Continuous8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
9.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
9.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
0.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
3.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
CD4 cell count545.4 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 280.2
652.3 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 360.4
744.3 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 654.9
1359.6 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1003.8
1647.5 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 965.7
1122.9 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 537.1
410.7 cells/µL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 238.2
CD4 percentage26.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
25.4 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
23 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
18.4 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
22.6 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
27.9 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
19.9 Percentage of total lymphocytes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
CDC HIV Clinical Classification
A
6 participants5 participants33 participants4 participants6 participants5 participants17 participants
CDC HIV Clinical Classification
B
5 participants3 participants38 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants29 participants
CDC HIV Clinical Classification
C
2 participants7 participants41 participants0 participants3 participants8 participants24 participants
CDC HIV Clinical Classification
N
5 participants1 participants14 participants7 participants3 participants7 participants1 participants
Duration of ARVs previously used7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
7.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
0.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
0.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants4 Participants55 Participants0 Participants5 Participants8 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants11 Participants81 Participants8 Participants3 Participants10 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants16 Participants4 Participants6 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Genotypic sensitivity score
0
0 participants1 participants10 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants9 participants
Genotypic sensitivity score
1
9 participants4 participants39 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants23 participants
Genotypic sensitivity score
2
7 participants6 participants52 participants5 participants3 participants11 participants20 participants
Genotypic sensitivity score
≥3
2 participants5 participants45 participants3 participants10 participants7 participants18 participants
Genotypic sensitivity score
Missing
0 participants0 participants6 participants3 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of antiretroviral (ARV) classes previously used
0
0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Number of antiretroviral (ARV) classes previously used
1
0 participants0 participants4 participants10 participants8 participants2 participants2 participants
Number of antiretroviral (ARV) classes previously used
2
8 participants5 participants35 participants2 participants4 participants13 participants9 participants
Number of antiretroviral (ARV) classes previously used
≥3
10 participants11 participants86 participants0 participants2 participants5 participants60 participants
Phenotypic Sensitivity score
0
0 participants1 participants6 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants5 participants
Phenotypic Sensitivity score
1
7 participants4 participants29 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants15 participants
Phenotypic Sensitivity score
2
8 participants2 participants50 participants5 participants2 participants8 participants25 participants
Phenotypic Sensitivity score
≥3
2 participants7 participants49 participants4 participants9 participants6 participants21 participants
Phenotypic Sensitivity score
Missing
1 participants2 participants18 participants2 participants3 participants5 participants5 participants
Plasma HIV RNA, categorical
0 to ≤4,000 copies/mL
2 participants2 participants16 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants10 participants
Plasma HIV RNA, categorical
>100,000 copies/mL
1 participants1 participants13 participants9 participants9 participants4 participants7 participants
Plasma HIV RNA, categorical
>4,000 to ≤50,000 copies/mL
11 participants12 participants74 participants2 participants1 participants11 participants40 participants
Plasma HIV RNA, categorical
>50,000 to ≤100,000 copies/mL
4 participants1 participants23 participants1 participants3 participants4 participants14 participants
Plasma HIV RNA, continuous4.3 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
4.3 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
4.6 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
6 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
5.4 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
4.4 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
4.3 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Prior use of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTI)
No
3 participants2 participants34 participants1 participants6 participants11 participants11 participants
Prior use of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTI)
Yes
15 participants14 participants118 participants11 participants8 participants10 participants60 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants12 Participants97 Participants12 Participants10 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants3 Participants45 Participants0 Participants2 Participants5 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants70 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants9 Participants82 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants37 Participants
Use of prior PIs
No
5 participants3 participants39 participants12 participants9 participants8 participants2 participants
Use of prior PIs
Yes
13 participants13 participants113 participants0 participants5 participants13 participants69 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 590 / 40 / 130 / 201 / 140 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 594 / 413 / 1320 / 2014 / 1412 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 592 / 44 / 137 / 207 / 144 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication

The attribution of relationship of serious adverse events to study drug for the purposes of employing the start, stop and pause rules was by consensus among the site investigator, study team (which includes representatives from Merck) and the Division of AIDS medical officer; if unanimous agreement between them cannot be established, the attribution made by the majority of these 3 persons or entities will be used. Gradation of relationship will use the following terminology: Not related, Probably not related, Possibly related, Probably related or Definitely related.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 24

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort INumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort VNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Died

Number of participants who died were summarized.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 24

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort INumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort VNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table, Version 1.0. All grade 3 and higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 24

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)20.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)25 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)15.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)30 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)35.7 percentage of participants
Cohort VPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)33.3 percentage of participants
Primary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). AUC12h (area-under-the-curve from 0 to 12 hours) were determined using the linear-log trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) results at the final recommended dose (Stage I).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)10.2 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 10
Cohort IIAPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)13.4 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 16.1
Cohort IIBPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)10.5 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 3.5
Cohort IIIPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)9.5 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort IVPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)9.3 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 3.2
Cohort VPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Curve (AUC12h)10.9 hour*mg/LStandard Deviation 4.4
Primary

PK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Plasma concentration at 12 hours postdose (C12h) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) results at the final recommended dose (Stage I).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)197.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 154.2
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)399.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 880.9
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)78.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 68.9
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)39.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.9
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)56.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 26.8
Cohort VPK Parameter: Concentration at 12 Hours Postdose (C12h)99.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 83.9
Primary

PK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) results at the final recommended dose (Stage I).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)2813.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2673.9
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)4055.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5269.5
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5314.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2842.6
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5204.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2940.6
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5683.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3685
Cohort VPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)4299.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1661.9
Primary

PK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Time to half of maximum plasma concentration Cmax (T1/2) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: Measured between days 5 and 12 of raltegravir initiation; Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) results at the final recommended dose (Stage I).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)4.9 hourStandard Deviation 3.6
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)3.7 hourStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)4.5 hourStandard Deviation 4.2
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)4.1 hourStandard Deviation 3.2
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)3.0 hourStandard Deviation 1.8
Cohort VPK Parameter: Time to Half of Maximum Plasma Concentration Cmax (T1/2)2.1 hourStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Change of CD4 Count From Baseline

Change in CD4 cell count from baseline was calculated as the value at later visit minus the value at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts are combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Cohort IChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24114.6 cells/µL
Cohort IChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 48168.4 cells/µL
Cohort IIAChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24-35.8 cells/µL
Cohort IIAChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 48189.5 cells/µL
Cohort IIBChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24143.4 cells/µL
Cohort IIBChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 4876.8 cells/µL
Cohort IIIChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24147.2 cells/µL
Cohort IIIChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 48158.1 cells/µL
Cohort IVChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24400.5 cells/µL
Cohort IVChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 48278.8 cells/µL
Cohort VChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 24499.2 cells/µL
Cohort VChange of CD4 Count From BaselineBaseline to Week 48876.0 cells/µL
Secondary

Change of CD4 Percent From Baseline

Change in CD4 percent from baseline was calculated as the value of the later visit minus the value at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts are combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Cohort IChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 244.1 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 485.2 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIAChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 242.2 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIAChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 486.0 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 240.8 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 481.6 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIIChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 245.3 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIIChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 484.3 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 246.2 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 486.4 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort VChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 249.0 percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort VChange of CD4 Percent From BaselineBaseline to Week 488.7 percentage of total lymphocytes
Secondary

Number of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication

The attribution of relationship of serious adverse events to study drug for the purposes of employing the start, stop and pause rules was by consensus among the site investigator, study team (which includes representatives from Merck) and the Division of AIDS medical officer; if unanimous agreement between them cannot be established, the attribution made by the majority of these 3 persons or entities will be used. Gradation of relationship will use the following terminology: Not related, Probably not related, Possibly related, Probably related or Definitely related.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort INumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Cohort VNumber of Participants Terminated From Treatment Due to Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR) Attributable to the Study Medication0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died

Number of participants who died were summarized.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort INumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Cohort VNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL

Plasma HIV RNA concentrations were determined at entry and at regular intervals using the HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5 (Roche Molecular Diagnostics) or RealTime HIV-1 (Abbott Molecular), and analyses used the Observed Failure Approach.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 2472.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4875 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 2450 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4875 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 2476.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4890.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 2470 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4884.2 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 2485.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4892.9 percentage of participants
Cohort VPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 24100 percentage of participants
Cohort VPercentage of Participants With ≥1 log10 Drop From Baseline in HIV RNA or HIV RNA <400 Copies/mLBaseline to Week 4880 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table, Version 1.0. All grade 3 and higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.

Time frame: From study entry through Week 48

Population: Final Dose Population: Participants accrued into Stage I and treated only at the dose ultimately selected for their cohorts were combined with those accrued into Stage II, where all participants received only the final selected doses for their respective cohorts.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)23.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)25 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)23.1 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)40 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)42.9 percentage of participants
Cohort VPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)33.3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026