Parkinson Disease, Parkinson's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Ropinirole hydrochloride, L-dopa, Parkinson's Disease, Dopamine agonist
Brief summary
Ropinirole Hydrochloride (ROP) was granted approval for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD) on 20 October 2006. ROP is expected to be used for a long term in clinical practice. However, no long-term clinical data with ROP administered three times daily are currently available from Japanese patients, and the clinical experience with ROP at \>10mg/day is limited. For this reason, this study was designed as a multicenter open-label uncontrolled study. This study will evaluate the long-term efficacy (Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Awake time spent Off/On, Modified Hoehn & Yahr stage, Schwab-England scale, Proportion of subjects remaining in this study and Clinical Global Impression (CGI)) and the long-term safety of ROP administered three times daily for in PD patients.
Interventions
Ropinirole Hydrochloride monotherapy group (ROP): Patients will receive ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose will start at 0.75 mg/day and will be increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose will be increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose will be maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement is expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa is prohibited during the study.
Ropinirole Hydrochloride with L-Dopa adjunct therapy group (ROP+L-Dopa): Patients will receive ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose will start at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day and will be increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose will be increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose will be maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement is expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remain unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria. Note that both inpatients and outpatients are eligible. * Patients with a diagnosis of PD (including juvenile parkinsonism) with Modified Hoehn & Yahr Stages I to IV. * Patients who have been receiving another dopamine agonist for at least 4 weeks prior to the start of the screening phase and are expected to benefit from conversion to ROP. * Age: 20 years (at the time of written informed consent). * Informed consent: Patients who are able to give written informed consent in person (i.e., patients who are capable of giving written informed consent on their own). * Gender: Male or female Females of childbearing potential are eligible for enrollment in the study, only if the subject has a negative pregnancy test at the start of the screening phase and agrees to conduct pregnancy testing at the protocol-specified visits during the study and use one of the following acceptable methods of contraceptions properly and accurately: * Abstinence * Oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone * Injectable progestogen * Implants of levonorgestrel * Estrogenic vaginal ring (Caution: This should be used cautiously, because the blood concentration of the study drug may be increased.) * Percutaneous contraceptive patches * Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) * Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject) * Double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical / vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)
Exclusion criteria
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study: * Patients who present with any serious medical condition other than PD (e.g., cardiac, hepatic or renal disorder or hematopoietic disorder). Serious is defined as Grade 3 as a rule according to the Classification of the Severity of Adverse Experiences. * Patients with postural hypotension with any subjective symptoms (e.g., dizziness and syncope). * Patients who have had any serious psychiatric symptoms (e.g., confusion, hallucination, delusion, abnormal behavior) (including symptoms caused by anti-PD drugs) within 6 months (26 weeks) prior to written informed consent. * Patients who have initiated any of the following drugs within 4 weeks of the start of the screening phase and have the dosing regimen of the drug changed within 4 weeks of the start of the screening phase. * L-dopa (+DCI) (NOTE: This does not apply to the monotherapy group.) * Anticholinergic agents: trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride, piroheptine hydrochloride, mazaticol hydrochloride, metixene hydrochloride, biperiden, profenamine * amantadine hydrochloride * droxidopa * citicoline * selegiline hydrochloride * entacapone * zonisamide * Patients with severe dementia with a Japanese UPDRS Part I (mentation, behavior, and mood) score of 3 or 4. * Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, who may be pregnant, or who plan for pregnancy during the study period or within 30 days after the last dose of the study drug. * Patients with a history of drug allergy to any ingredients of ROP tablets. * Patients who have received surgical treatment for PD in the past (e.g., pallidectomy, deep brain stimulation). * Patients who have been treated with any other investigational product within 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening phase. * Patients who, in the judgement of the investigator (or sub-investigator), have evidence of alcohol or drug abuse. * Others whom the investigator (or sub-investigator) considers ineligible for the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. |
| Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score. |
| Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state or having no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal. |
| Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score. |
| Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. |
| Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score. |
| Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants in each state were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in the corresponding state or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal. |
| Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden). |
| Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Days 0-422 | The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored. |
| Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Days 0-419 | The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored. |
| Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52 and FAP (up to Week 52) | CGI is measured on the following 7-point scale: 1, Very much improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; and 7, Very much worse. Responders are defined as those participants scored as very much improved or much improved. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The off's duration (awake time spent off) and the on's duration (awake time spent on) on each day were calculated. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
52 weeks of Treatment Phase, consisting of 4 weeks of Fixed Titration Phase and 48 weeks of Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, was started after 1 to 4 weeks of Screening Phase. Although the results are presented by participants with and without L-dopa, this study was a single-arm design, and L-dopa was not the investigational product.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. | 65 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. | 58 |
| Total | 123 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 10 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Total | ROP+L-Dopa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 65.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.18 | 65.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.56 | 66.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Japanese Heritage | 58 participants | 123 participants | 65 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 31 Participants | 58 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 27 Participants | 65 Participants | 38 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 42 / 65 | 43 / 58 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 65 | 3 / 58 |
Outcome results
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants enrolled in the Treatment Phase, excluding those with objective measurements not meeting the major eligibility criteria, who did not receive ROP at all, and those with no valid post-baseline data. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) | Week 52, n=45, 46 | -7.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.17 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) | FAP, n=61, 58 | -5.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.33 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) | Week 52, n=45, 46 | -6.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.56 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) | FAP, n=61, 58 | -5.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.08 |
Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. Participants having off state at baseline were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at baseline. The participant not included in the FAP as well as one having off state in the ROP+L-dopa group at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=62,58 | 20.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.44 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=46, 46 | 12.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.26 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=62,58 | 19.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=46, 46 | 13.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.86 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.01 |
Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state or having no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. Participants without off state at baseline were not included in the analysis of baseline off state data. Participants not included at FAP as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27 | 7.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16 | 4.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.37 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=64, 26 | 5.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.18 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.04 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16 | 11.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.93 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=64, 26 | 15.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.98 |
Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group | Baseline, n=58 | 7.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.59 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group | Week 52, n=46 | 5.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.65 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group | FAP, n=58 | 5.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.52 |
Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=65, 58 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=65, 58 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=65, 58 | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.01 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Baseline, n=65, 58 | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline
Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The off's duration (awake time spent off) and the on's duration (awake time spent on) on each day were calculated.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants having off hour of zero at baseline were not included at FAP. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline | Week 52, n=16 | -0.09 hours | Standard Deviation 3.502 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline | FAP, n=22 | -0.40 hours | Standard Deviation 3.453 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline | Week 52, n=16 | 1.00 hours | Standard Deviation 4.09 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline | FAP, n=22 | 1.00 hours | Standard Deviation 3.867 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline, or no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | -3.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.19 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=64, 22 | -2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.54 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.77 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=64, 22 | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.46 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46 | -2.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.86 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | -0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.54 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.24 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline in off state, or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | 3.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 10.52 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 21 | 3.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 9.97 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | 5.8 percent change | Standard Deviation 16.31 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 21 | 2.6 percent change | Standard Deviation 14.63 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group
The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group | FAP, n=58 | 1.5 percent change | Standard Deviation 7.28 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group | Week 52, n=46 | 2.1 percent change | Standard Deviation 6.74 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 in that group and those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=45, 46 | -36.83 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 40.001 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=61, 58 | -30.42 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 41.427 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=45, 46 | -37.73 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 34.739 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=61, 58 | -27.79 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 42.531 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline in off state, or having no data at Week 52/withdrawal in off state. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | -48.98 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 45.862 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=62, 22 | -29.00 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 73.391 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 13 | -17.68 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 31.381 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=62, 22 | -4.10 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 36.155 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=44 | -24.35 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 59.429 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=56 | -16.74 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 61.175 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change, or having no post-baseline data. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=19, 22 | -68.86 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 41.929 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=27, 26 | -38.09 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 109.715 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=19, 22 | -22.73 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 79.772 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=27, 26 | -21.92 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 73.595 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change, or having no post-baseline data. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=23, 17 | -8.70 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 62.889 |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=37, 20 | 13.30 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 91.068 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=23, 17 | 0.00 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 115.92 |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=37, 20 | -2.50 percent change in score | Standard Deviation 109.394 |
Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants in each state were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in the corresponding state or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. Participants without off state at baseline were not included in the analysis of baseline off state data. Participants not included at FAP as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 3 | 8 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 0 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1.5 | 7 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1 | 5 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1.5 | 3 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2 | 21 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2 | 22 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2 | 15 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2.5 | 16 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2.5 | 7 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 3 | 16 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 0 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 4 | 3 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 3 | 11 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 0 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1 | 10 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 4 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1.5 | 6 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 4 | 3 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1 | 13 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2.5 | 6 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1.5 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 0 | 0 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 3 | 4 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 4 | 4 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 5 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 0 | 0 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1.5 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2.5 | 5 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 3 | 7 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 4 | 7 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | FAP, n=63, 25, Stage 5 | 3 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 0 | 0 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1 | 0 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 5 | 2 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2 | 2 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2.5 | 9 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 3 | 7 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Baseline, n=65, 27, Stage 4 | 6 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1.5 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2 | 1 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Week 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2.5 | 4 participants |
Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group
The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided.
Time frame: Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 0 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 1 | 9 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 1.5 | 2 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 2 | 21 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 2.5 | 14 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 3 | 12 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 4 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Baseline, n=58, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 0 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 1 | 12 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 1.5 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 2 | 14 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 2.5 | 13 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 3 | 5 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 4 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | Week 52, n=46, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 0 | 1 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 1 | 13 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 1.5 | 2 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 2 | 17 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 2.5 | 18 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 3 | 7 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 4 | 0 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group | FAP, n=58, Stage 5 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP
CGI is measured on the following 7-point scale: 1, Very much improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; and 7, Very much worse. Responders are defined as those participants scored as very much improved or much improved.
Time frame: Week 52 and FAP (up to Week 52)
Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 33 participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 34 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP | Week 52, n=47, 46 | 28 participants |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP | FAP, n=64, 58 | 31 participants |
Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group
The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.
Time frame: Days 0-419
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 167 | 88 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 0 | 100 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 14 | 98 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 29 | 97 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 36 | 95 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 66 | 93 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 71 | 91 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 85 | 90 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 169 | 86 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 175 | 84 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 210 | 83 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 241 | 81 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 253 | 79 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group | Day 419 | 79 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group
The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.
Time frame: Days 0-422
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 0 | 100 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 22 | 98 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 33 | 95 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 43 | 94 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 85 | 92 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 101 | 91 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 112 | 89 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 128 | 88 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 196 | 82 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 203 | 80 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 238 | 78 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 282 | 77 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 301 | 75 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 341 | 74 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 365 | 72 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 422 | 72 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 154 | 86 percentage of participants |
| ROP+L-Dopa | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group | Day 169 | 83 percentage of participants |