Skip to content

REQUIP (Ropinirole Hydrochloride) IR Long-Term Phase 4 Study

Post-Marketing Clinical Study of REQUIP (Ropinirole Hydrochloride) Tablets in Patients With Parkinson's Disease- Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy and Safety -

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00485069
Enrollment
123
Registered
2007-06-12
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2010-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease, Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Ropinirole hydrochloride, L-dopa, Parkinson's Disease, Dopamine agonist

Brief summary

Ropinirole Hydrochloride (ROP) was granted approval for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD) on 20 October 2006. ROP is expected to be used for a long term in clinical practice. However, no long-term clinical data with ROP administered three times daily are currently available from Japanese patients, and the clinical experience with ROP at \>10mg/day is limited. For this reason, this study was designed as a multicenter open-label uncontrolled study. This study will evaluate the long-term efficacy (Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Awake time spent Off/On, Modified Hoehn & Yahr stage, Schwab-England scale, Proportion of subjects remaining in this study and Clinical Global Impression (CGI)) and the long-term safety of ROP administered three times daily for in PD patients.

Interventions

DRUGROP

Ropinirole Hydrochloride monotherapy group (ROP): Patients will receive ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose will start at 0.75 mg/day and will be increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose will be increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose will be maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement is expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa is prohibited during the study.

DRUGROP+L-Dopa

Ropinirole Hydrochloride with L-Dopa adjunct therapy group (ROP+L-Dopa): Patients will receive ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose will start at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day and will be increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose will be increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose will be maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement is expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remain unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria. Note that both inpatients and outpatients are eligible. * Patients with a diagnosis of PD (including juvenile parkinsonism) with Modified Hoehn & Yahr Stages I to IV. * Patients who have been receiving another dopamine agonist for at least 4 weeks prior to the start of the screening phase and are expected to benefit from conversion to ROP. * Age: 20 years (at the time of written informed consent). * Informed consent: Patients who are able to give written informed consent in person (i.e., patients who are capable of giving written informed consent on their own). * Gender: Male or female Females of childbearing potential are eligible for enrollment in the study, only if the subject has a negative pregnancy test at the start of the screening phase and agrees to conduct pregnancy testing at the protocol-specified visits during the study and use one of the following acceptable methods of contraceptions properly and accurately: * Abstinence * Oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone * Injectable progestogen * Implants of levonorgestrel * Estrogenic vaginal ring (Caution: This should be used cautiously, because the blood concentration of the study drug may be increased.) * Percutaneous contraceptive patches * Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) * Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject) * Double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical / vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)

Exclusion criteria

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study: * Patients who present with any serious medical condition other than PD (e.g., cardiac, hepatic or renal disorder or hematopoietic disorder). Serious is defined as Grade 3 as a rule according to the Classification of the Severity of Adverse Experiences. * Patients with postural hypotension with any subjective symptoms (e.g., dizziness and syncope). * Patients who have had any serious psychiatric symptoms (e.g., confusion, hallucination, delusion, abnormal behavior) (including symptoms caused by anti-PD drugs) within 6 months (26 weeks) prior to written informed consent. * Patients who have initiated any of the following drugs within 4 weeks of the start of the screening phase and have the dosing regimen of the drug changed within 4 weeks of the start of the screening phase. * L-dopa (+DCI) (NOTE: This does not apply to the monotherapy group.) * Anticholinergic agents: trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride, piroheptine hydrochloride, mazaticol hydrochloride, metixene hydrochloride, biperiden, profenamine * amantadine hydrochloride * droxidopa * citicoline * selegiline hydrochloride * entacapone * zonisamide * Patients with severe dementia with a Japanese UPDRS Part I (mentation, behavior, and mood) score of 3 or 4. * Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, who may be pregnant, or who plan for pregnancy during the study period or within 30 days after the last dose of the study drug. * Patients with a history of drug allergy to any ingredients of ROP tablets. * Patients who have received surgical treatment for PD in the past (e.g., pallidectomy, deep brain stimulation). * Patients who have been treated with any other investigational product within 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening phase. * Patients who, in the judgement of the investigator (or sub-investigator), have evidence of alcohol or drug abuse. * Others whom the investigator (or sub-investigator) considers ineligible for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.
Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state or having no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal.
Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.
Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.
Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants in each state were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in the corresponding state or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal.
Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupThe Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).
Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP GroupBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).
Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDays 0-422The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.
Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDays 0-419The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.
Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52 and FAP (up to Week 52)CGI is measured on the following 7-point scale: 1, Very much improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; and 7, Very much worse. Responders are defined as those participants scored as very much improved or much improved.
Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at BaselineBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The off's duration (awake time spent off) and the on's duration (awake time spent on) on each day were calculated.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAPBaseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

52 weeks of Treatment Phase, consisting of 4 weeks of Fixed Titration Phase and 48 weeks of Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, was started after 1 to 4 weeks of Screening Phase. Although the results are presented by participants with and without L-dopa, this study was a single-arm design, and L-dopa was not the investigational product.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ROP+L-Dopa
Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study.
65
Ropinirole Hydrochloride
Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study.
58
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event104
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy21
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRopinirole HydrochlorideTotalROP+L-Dopa
Age Continuous65.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.18
65.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.56
66.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
58 participants123 participants65 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants58 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants65 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
42 / 6543 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 653 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants enrolled in the Treatment Phase, excluding those with objective measurements not meeting the major eligibility criteria, who did not receive ROP at all, and those with no valid post-baseline data. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)Week 52, n=45, 46-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.17
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)FAP, n=61, 58-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)Week 52, n=45, 46-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.56
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP)FAP, n=61, 58-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Secondary

Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. Participants having off state at baseline were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at baseline. The participant not included in the FAP as well as one having off state in the ROP+L-dopa group at Week 52 and those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=62,5820.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=46, 4612.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 5814.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=62,5819.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=46, 4613.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.86
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 5814.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.01
Secondary

Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state or having no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. Participants without off state at baseline were not included in the analysis of baseline off state data. Participants not included at FAP as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 277.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 164.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.37
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=64, 265.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.18
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 2714.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.04
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 1611.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.93
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=64, 2615.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.98
Secondary

Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP GroupBaseline, n=587.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.59
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP GroupWeek 52, n=465.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP GroupFAP, n=585.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.52
Secondary

Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=65, 580.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 460.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 580.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=65, 580.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 460.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 580.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=65, 582.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 461.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
ROP+L-DopaJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 582.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPBaseline, n=65, 580.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 460.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Ropinirole HydrochlorideJapanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAPFAP, n=64, 580.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at Baseline

Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The off's duration (awake time spent off) and the on's duration (awake time spent on) on each day were calculated.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants having off hour of zero at baseline were not included at FAP. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at BaselineWeek 52, n=16-0.09 hoursStandard Deviation 3.502
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at BaselineFAP, n=22-0.40 hoursStandard Deviation 3.453
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at BaselineWeek 52, n=161.00 hoursStandard Deviation 4.09
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in Awake Time Off (Hours) and Awake Time On (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With 0 Off (Hour) at BaselineFAP, n=221.00 hoursStandard Deviation 3.867
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline, or no data in off state at Week 52/withdrawal. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 13-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=64, 22-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.54
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 13-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=64, 22-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.46
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.86
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 46-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 58-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 46-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 58-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 460.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 580.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 460.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 580.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline in off state, or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 133.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.52
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 213.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.97
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 135.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.31
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 212.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.63
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group

The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score is measured as percentage, from 100% (Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal. Unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP GroupFAP, n=581.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.28
ROP+L-DopaMean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP GroupWeek 52, n=462.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.74
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants with off state at baseline or without post-baseline data were not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP. These participants as well as one with off state at Week 52 in that group and those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=45, 46-36.83 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 40.001
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=61, 58-30.42 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 41.427
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=45, 46-37.73 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 34.739
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in On State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=61, 58-27.79 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 42.531
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. On state is where PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for FAP data. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, having no post-baseline data in on state, not having off state at baseline in off state, or having no data at Week 52/withdrawal in off state. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 13-48.98 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 45.862
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=62, 22-29.00 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 73.391
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 13-17.68 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 31.381
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=62, 22-4.10 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 36.155
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn were not included at Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=44-24.35 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 59.429
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=56-16.74 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 61.175
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change, or having no post-baseline data. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn in each group were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=19, 22-68.86 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 41.929
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=27, 26-38.09 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 109.715
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=19, 22-22.73 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 79.772
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=27, 26-21.92 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 73.595
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (change from baseline score/baseline score) \* 100; change from baseline was calculated as thescore at the observation day minus the baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants were not included at FAP as having a baseline value of zero, which could not be used for calculating the percent change, or having no post-baseline data. These participants as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=23, 17-8.70 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 62.889
ROP+L-DopaMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=37, 2013.30 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 91.068
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=23, 170.00 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 115.92
Ropinirole HydrochlorideMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=37, 20-2.50 percent change in scoreStandard Deviation 109.394
Secondary

Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Some participants in each state were not included at FAP as having no post-baseline data in the corresponding state or having no data in the corresponding state at Week 52/withdrawal.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. Participants without off state at baseline were not included in the analysis of baseline off state data. Participants not included at FAP as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 38 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 00 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1.57 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 15 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 50 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1.53 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 221 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 222 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 215 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2.516 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2.57 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 316 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 01 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 43 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 311 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 50 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 01 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 110 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 41 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1.56 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 43 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 113 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2.56 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 50 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 1.51 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 00 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 34 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 44 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 51 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 00 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 11 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 1.51 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 21 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 2.55 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 37 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 47 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupFAP, n=63, 25, Stage 53 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 00 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 10 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 52 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 22 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 2.59 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 37 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupBaseline, n=65, 27, Stage 46 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 11 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 1.51 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 21 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by On/Off State in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupWeek 52, n=47, 16, Stage 2.54 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group

The Modified Hoehn & Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for staging: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided.

Time frame: Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. Participants prematurely withdrawn from the study were not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 00 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 19 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 1.52 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 221 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 2.514 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 312 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 40 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupBaseline, n=58, Stage 50 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 01 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 112 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 1.51 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 214 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 2.513 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 35 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 40 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupWeek 52, n=46, Stage 50 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 01 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 113 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 1.52 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 217 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 2.518 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 37 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 40 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP GroupFAP, n=58, Stage 50 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP

CGI is measured on the following 7-point scale: 1, Very much improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; and 7, Very much worse. Responders are defined as those participants scored as very much improved or much improved.

Time frame: Week 52 and FAP (up to Week 52)

Population: FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 4633 participants
ROP+L-DopaNumber of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 5834 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAPWeek 52, n=47, 4628 participants
Ropinirole HydrochlorideNumber of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAPFAP, n=64, 5831 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group

The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.

Time frame: Days 0-419

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 16788 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 0100 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 1498 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 2997 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 3695 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 6693 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 7191 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 8590 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 16986 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 17584 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 21083 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 24181 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 25379 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP GroupDay 41979 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group

The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 52) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.

Time frame: Days 0-422

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 0100 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 2298 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 3395 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 4394 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 8592 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 10191 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 11289 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 12888 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 19682 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 20380 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 23878 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 28277 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 30175 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 34174 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 36572 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 42272 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 15486 percentage of participants
ROP+L-DopaPercentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa GroupDay 16983 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026