Skip to content

Measuring Gait And Self-Reported Pain In Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Using Placebo/Oxycodone/Celecoxib.

MEASURES OF GAIT AND SELF-REPORTED PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE: A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLIND WASHOUT, DOUBLE-BLIND TREATMENT, DOUBLE DUMMY CROSS-OVER PILOT TRIAL USING PLACEBO, OXYCODONE AND CELECOXIB (A9011030)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00484718
Enrollment
6
Registered
2007-06-11
Start date
2008-01-17
Completion date
2009-06-10
Last updated
2021-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The Purpose of this trial is to evaluate the use of a cross-over trial design in an osteoarthritis population. We will determine the inter- and intra-subject variability in osteoarthritis (OA) endpoints and evaluate if efficacy can be detected by measuring OA endpoints following treatment with 2 different types of analgesics in a crossover study of this design.

Detailed description

Methodology study to evaluate the use of a cross over design and gait analysis. The study was terminated by mutual consent with the study site at a meeting on the 1 April 2009, because of slow recruitment due to a high screen fail rate. The study was not stopped for safety reasons.

Interventions

DRUGcelecoxib

oral, 100 mg bid

DRUGOxycodone

oral, 20 mg bid

DRUGplacebo

oral bid

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has been taking an NSAID at least 15 of the past 30 days for index knee pain * Grades 2 or 3 OA as defined by the Kellgren and Lawrence Grading System of the medial tibiofemoral joint (joint space narrowing in the medial compartment \> lateral compartment as assessed by x-ray) using the Altman Atlas of OA7. This must be documented with a report from an x-ray of the study joint taken either at screening or within 1 year prior to screening * Subject meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical classification criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee, defined by the following: Knee pain and at least 3 of the following: oAge \>50 oMorning stiffness \<30 minutes oCrepitus on active motion oBony tenderness oBony enlargement oNo palpable warmth of synovium.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to celecoxib, sulfonamides, aspirin, or opioids including oxycodone * Significant pain outside the index knee, including significant hip or back pain that can not be distinguished from OA pain or that interferes with ability to walk. (Patients with bilateral knee OA will be allowed into the study. The index knee should be defined as the more painful knee * Predominantly patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis in the index knee as assessed by clinical examination * Subject who are unable to discontinue all formulations of prior analgesics other than acetaminophen during the Washout Period of the study, or who are anticipated to be unable to discontinue rescue medication for 24 hours prior to the respective visits. (Low dose aspirin may be taken for cardiac prophylaxis * Excessive signal knee joint laxity indicative of functional ligamentous deficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee at the time of the visit was assessed using an 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS ranging from 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain. Higher score indicate more pain.
Change From Baseline in Knee Adduction Moment at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Adduction (external) moment was defined as the ground-generated torque that forces the distal tibia toward the midline of the body, which forces the knee away from the midline, into a varus or bow-legged position. External knee adduction moment was assessed as percent body weight\*height (%BW\*ht).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The index consists of 24 questions (5 pain, 2 stiffness, and 17 physical function). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse pain. Pain subscale total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in in the study joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse physical function. Physical function subscale scores range from 0 to 68, where higher scores indicated more difficulty in performing daily activities.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in study joint. The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the in the study joint during the past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse stiffness. The stiffness subscale score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicated worse stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Total Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 \[minimum\] to 4 \[maximum\], higher score indicating worse study joint condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.
Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Inhibition at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Quadriceps inhibition was assessed in terms of flexion-extension range of motion and normalized mid stance knee flexion angle in degrees.
Change From Baseline in Peak Ground Reaction Force at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Change from baseline in peak ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds (BW\*sec) was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.
Change From Baseline in Total Ground Reaction Force at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Change from baseline in total ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.
Change From Baseline in Stride Length at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The level walking was assessed by stride length; assessment was done based on 6 stride cycles over a range of walking speeds.
Change From Baseline in Walking Speed at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Change from baseline in walking speed in meters per second was assessed.
Change From Baseline in Cadence at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Cadence was defined as the rate at which a person walk, expressed in steps per minute.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition (PGAAC) Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The PGAAC is self-administered measure in which participants answered the following question: considering all the ways the OA in your signal knee affects you, how are you doing today?. Participants rated their condition using the following scale: 1= very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Total 6 participants were randomized to receive 1 of 6 possible treatment sequences of ABC, ACB. BAC, BCA, CAB, CBA (where: A=placebo, B=celecoxib, C=oxycodone) in treatment periods 1, 2 and 3 (each 2-week treatment period was separated by a 2-week washout period).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All randomized participants who received placebo matched to celecoxib and oxycodone, celecoxib 100 mg and oxycodone 20 mg orally, twice daily in one of the 6 treatment sequences in each of three treatment periods.
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 64 / 66 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Cadence at Week 12

Cadence was defined as the rate at which a person walk, expressed in steps per minute.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Knee Adduction Moment at Week 12

Adduction (external) moment was defined as the ground-generated torque that forces the distal tibia toward the midline of the body, which forces the knee away from the midline, into a varus or bow-legged position. External knee adduction moment was assessed as percent body weight\*height (%BW\*ht).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12

The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee at the time of the visit was assessed using an 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate worse pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12

The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS ranging from 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain. Higher score indicate more pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition (PGAAC) Score at Week 12

The PGAAC is self-administered measure in which participants answered the following question: considering all the ways the OA in your signal knee affects you, how are you doing today?. Participants rated their condition using the following scale: 1= very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Peak Ground Reaction Force at Week 12

Change from baseline in peak ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds (BW\*sec) was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Inhibition at Week 12

Quadriceps inhibition was assessed in terms of flexion-extension range of motion and normalized mid stance knee flexion angle in degrees.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Stride Length at Week 12

The level walking was assessed by stride length; assessment was done based on 6 stride cycles over a range of walking speeds.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Total Ground Reaction Force at Week 12

Change from baseline in total ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Walking Speed at Week 12

Change from baseline in walking speed in meters per second was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Week 12

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The index consists of 24 questions (5 pain, 2 stiffness, and 17 physical function). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse pain. Pain subscale total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating worse pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 12

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in in the study joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse physical function. Physical function subscale scores range from 0 to 68, where higher scores indicated more difficulty in performing daily activities.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 12

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in study joint. The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the in the study joint during the past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse stiffness. The stiffness subscale score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicated worse stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Total Score at Week 12

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 \[minimum\] to 4 \[maximum\], higher score indicating worse study joint condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As study was terminated, data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed due to low number of participant enrolled which were required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026