Skip to content

Tetracaine Compared to Placebo for Reducing Pain With Palivizumab - A Pilot Study

Tetracaine (Ametop®) Compared to Placebo for Reducing Pain Associated With Intramuscular Injection of Palivizumab (Synagis®) - A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00484393
Enrollment
7
Registered
2007-06-08
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2015-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

This is a small study known as a pilot study. This pilot study is being done to see if a difference in pain from intramuscular palivizumab injection can be detected if tetracaine a topical numbing gel is used compared to no medication (placebo). If a difference is found in this pilot study, then a larger study may be done to confirm that there is a difference in pain experience.

Detailed description

Objective: 1\) To determine if tetracaine 4% gel (Ametop ®) reduces the pain of intramuscular palivizumab compared to placebo for pediatric patients between 1 month and 2 years of age. Rationale: Premedication with a systemic analgesic has not been shown to be effective in reducing the pain from an acute localized insult. EMLA and tetracaine have been shown to decrease pain associated with immunizations. EMLA requires a 60 minute application, which decreases the usefulness in a busy clinic. Tetracaine has a quicker onset of action and therefore may be more suitable for use in a busy clinic. Efficacy of tetracaine prior to palivizumab has not been reported and therefore it is not known if it can reduce the pain associated with intramuscular palivizumab injection. Setting: Respiratory synctial virus (RSV) clinic in the pediatric outpatient ward at Surrey Memorial Hospital. Procedure: A notice will be posted in the RSV clinic inviting parents to contact research staff if interested in participating in this study. When a parent contacts staff about the study, a nurse or pharmacist involved in the study will meet with the parent to review eligibility and obtain informed consent. Once informed consent obtained subject will be randomized by study pharmacist to receive either tetracaine 4% gel (Ametop®) or placebo before administration of the next palivizumab injection (study injection 1); a 4 block randomization design will be used. At the next injection (study injection 2) the subject will receive either tetracaine or placebo, whichever agent they did not receive at study injection 1. The subjects will serve as their own control. The placebo (Aquatain; Whitehall-Robins, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) is visually and cosmetically similar to tetracaine 4% gel. One gram of drug or placebo will be dispensed in unit dose 5mL oral syringes, heat sealed to prevent evaporation and stored in a refrigerator for up to one week, after which it will be discarded if unused and redispensed. Tetracaine is commercially available in 1.5g tubes that produce approximately 1g tetracaine. On the day of immunization and on arrival to the clinic, a clinic nurse who is unaware of the treatment assignment will apply 1g of tetracaine or placebo to the subject's thigh and cover it with a dressing (opcit; Smith and Nephew). They will record the time of the application of the study gel. The clinic nurse will remove the dressing and study gel after 30-45 minutes and record the time of removal. The gel will be wiped from the skin with a paper tissue. A 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) will be used to assess local skin reactions after removing study gel. Immediately before the injection the site will be cleaned with an alcohol swab, then the dose (15mg/kg using current weight) of palivizumab will be administered using a ½ - 5/8 inch 23-25 gauge needle. A RSV clinic nurse will inject palivizumab within several minutes of gel removal; clinic nurses will not be aware of the treatment assignment for the subjects. Study injection 1 and 2 will be video recorded. A mirror will be mounted so the video recorder can capture the subject's reaction both face on and from the mirror image. The videotape will continue until the subject calms down following the injection. The subject can be held by a parent during the injection and provide whatever usual comfort measures they would provide. Following the injection the parent will be asked questions to determine their interpretation of the subject's pain response to the injections and if there any factors that may affect the pain response. Once both study injections are completed the video will be reviewed and pain assessed for both injections by the same scorer using FLACC pain scale. The scorer will be one pediatric registered nurse who is competent in completing pain analysis for infants. The scorer will be blind as to which dose is tetracaine and which is placebo. Data Collection: The data collected will include the FLACC pain scale, parent assessment of patient's pain, factors affecting pain response, as well as identify adverse effects from tetracaine and placebo. Sample size and statistical Analysis: The number of subjects with informed consent will determine sample size. Statistical analysis will involve descriptive statistics only. Ethics: Confidentiality will always be maintained. No information as to the identify of the child will be placed on the data collection forms. Every child will be assigned a number to facilitate identification by the researchers. Informed consent will be obtained. Personnel: A team consisting of nurses, a physician, and a clinical pharmacist from SMH will conduct the study. All personnel are currently involved in the day-to-day management of these children and have the required expertise in carrying out this project. Timeline: The study will be submitted for ethical approval by the research ethics board, Fraser Health in April 2007. After approval anticipate patient enrolment to start in November 2007 and complete enrolment by March 2008. A further 4 months will be needed to analyze the data and prepare a manuscript. Expected completion date for the project is July 2008. Budget: No additional costs are expected for this study.

Interventions

DRUGtetracaine 4% gel

tetracaine applied prior to 1 injection

DRUGPlacebo

placebo applied prior to 1 injection

Sponsors

Fraser Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Infants between 1 month and 2 years of age receiving palivizumab at Surrey Memorial Hospital for 2 consecutive intramuscular injections during the 2007/8 season * Parents need to complete informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy/sensitivity to tetracaine, or ester type anaesthetics. * Infants who present with fever or illness that prevent administration of palivizumab.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.2 visits, 1 month apartParent score 1-10 (1 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score 0-10 (at baseline and post injection) (0 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) Change in FLACC score

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tetracaine First
Tetracaine 4% gel 1g applied to injection site first, then placebo with subsequent injection
4
Placebo First
Placebo cream (Aquatain) 1g applied to inejction site first, then tetracaine with subsequent injection
3
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTetracaine FirstPlacebo FirstTotal
Age, Customized
2-6 months
4 participants3 participants7 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
1 participants1 participants2 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

To Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.

Parent score 1-10 (1 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score 0-10 (at baseline and post injection) (0 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) Change in FLACC score

Time frame: 2 visits, 1 month apart

Population: Each participant was evaluated for repsonse following tetracaine and following placebo

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
TetracaineTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.Parent score7.3 units on a scale
TetracaineTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.FLACC at baseline1.7 units on a scale
TetracaineTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.FLACC post injection8.4 units on a scale
TetracaineTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.Change in FLACC6.7 units on a scale
PlaceboTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.Change in FLACC7.7 units on a scale
PlaceboTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.Parent score7.3 units on a scale
PlaceboTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.FLACC post injection9.3 units on a scale
PlaceboTo Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.FLACC at baseline1.6 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026