Skip to content

High Dose or High Dose Frequency Study of Alglucosidase Alfa

An Exploratory, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of High Dose or High Dosing Frequency Alglucosidase Alfa Treatment in Patients With Pompe Disease Who Do Not Have an Optimal Response to the Standard Dose Regimen

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00483379
Enrollment
13
Registered
2007-06-07
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2014-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pompe Disease, Glycogen Storage Disease Type II (GSD-II), Glycogenesis 2 Acid Maltase Deficiency

Brief summary

Pompe disease (also known as glycogen storage disease Type II) is caused by a deficiency of a critical enzyme in the body called acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). Normally, GAA is used by the body's cells to break down glycogen (a stored form of sugar) within specialized structures called lysosomes. In patients with Pompe disease, an excessive amount of glycogen accumulates and is stored in various tissues, especially heart and skeletal muscle, which prevents their normal function. The objective of this exploratory study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of alternative dosing regimens of alglucosidase alfa in patients with Pompe disease who have not demonstrated an optimal response to the standard dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg every other week after a minimum of 6 months treatment immediately prior to study entry.

Interventions

intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient or patient's legal guardian must provide signed, informed consent prior to performing any study-related procedures; * The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of Pompe disease as defined by documented GAA deficiency in skin fibroblasts or blood; * The patient must have been compliant with the standard dosing regimen of alglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg every other week) for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to study entry * The patient must have clinical decline or sub-optimal improvement in at least one of the following parameters as compared to their condition prior to the beginning alglucosidase alfa treatment: 1. Cardiac: Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-score ≥6 or LVM index ≥150 g/m2 after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa; OR 2. Respiratory: New development of respiratory failure requiring the use of ventilatory assistance (invasive or non-invasive) after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa. Ventilatory assistance must have been required for at least 4 weeks prior to study enrollment; OR 3. Motor Skills: * For patients ≤ 2 years of age at study entry, failure to acquire at least 2 new gross motor milestones after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa; OR * For patients \> 2 years of age at study entry, worsening of proximal upper extremity muscle weakness as determined by the Investigator through loss of functional use of the upper extremities after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa, OR * For patients \> 8 years of age at study entry, worsening of proximal upper extremity muscle weakness as determined by the Investigator through longitudinal assessments of manual muscle testing after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa, OR * For patients previously ambulatory, progression to use of an assistive device for ambulation due to worsening of proximal lower extremity muscle weakness after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa.

Exclusion criteria

* For patients \< 18 years of age, negative Cross-Reactive Immunologic Material (CRIM) assay result (added in protocol amendment #2); * Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with treatment or evaluation of safety and/or efficacy of alglucosidase alfa; * The patient is not currently receiving alglucosidase alfa; * The patient has major congenital abnormality; * The patient has used any investigational product (other than alglucosidase alfa in those regions where the product is not commercially available) within 30 days prior to study enrollment; * The patient is pregnant or lactating.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentBaseline, Week 52Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; respiratory decline as measured by change in ventilator use is summarized in this outcome. Ventilator use might have improved (less use of ventilator support), had no change, or worsened (more use of ventilator support). Each participant served as his or her own control.
Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentBaseline, Week 52Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; motor function decline primarily based on Gross Motor Function Measure 66 and Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory results is summarized. Participants could gain motor function (improve), had no change (declined stopped), or continued loss (worsened). Each participant served as his or her own control.
Summary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodDay 1 up to Week 52Overall safety summary of participants experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), treatment-related AEs, and Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs). Summary is based on Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as AEs that occurred following the initiation of study treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment (Week 52). Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.
Change From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Baseline, approximately Week 52The change from baseline in ventilator use at the last assessment is summarized as improved (less use of ventilator support), no change, worsened (increased use of ventilator support), and did not use ventilator support.
Change From Baseline in Body Strength Measured by the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Total Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Body strength is measured by the MMT score on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores representing greater body strength.
Baseline Values of Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) ResultsDay 0The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.
Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-ScoresDay 0Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. Negative values indicate a smaller than mean LVM and values higher than 0 indicate a larger LVM than the mean. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.
Baseline Values in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI)Day 0The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near 0 reflecting low capability and scores near 100 reflecting high capability.
Change From Baseline in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Change from baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near 0 reflecting low capability and scores near 100 reflecting high capability.
Baseline Values for Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Day 0Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease and positive change from baseline an increase in LVM Z-score. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.
Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)Day 0Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline. Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Fourteen participants were screened and enrolled; however, one withdrew before receiving any study infusions due to the burden of weekly trips to the medical center.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every Week
Participants were treated with alglucosidase alfa 20 mg/kg every week for 52 weeks. This was the 'frequent dose' arm.
6
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other Week
Participants were treated with alglucosidase alfa 40 mg/kg every other week for 52 weeks. This was the 'high dose' arm.
7
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event10
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekAlglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekTotal
Age, Continuous23.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.75
16.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.56
19.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.29
Age, Customized
>= 18 and <=65 years
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
<18 years
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Cross-Reactive Immunologic Material (CRIM) Assay Result
Negative
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Cross-Reactive Immunologic Material (CRIM) Assay Result
Positive
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Cross-Reactive Immunologic Material (CRIM) Assay Result
Unknown
5 participants4 participants9 participants
Life-stage of Disease Onset
Infantile-onset Pompe Disease
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Life-stage of Disease Onset
Late-onset Pompe Disease
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Parameter in Clinical Decline
Cardiac
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Parameter in Clinical Decline
Motor Skills
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Parameter in Clinical Decline
Respiratory
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 67 / 71 / 11 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 61 / 71 / 10 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard Treatment

Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; motor function decline primarily based on Gross Motor Function Measure 66 and Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory results is summarized. Participants could gain motor function (improve), had no change (declined stopped), or continued loss (worsened). Each participant served as his or her own control.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All participants who enrolled due to decline in motor function while on standard treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentGained gross or fine motor skills2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentNo change1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentContinued motor loss1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentNot evaluated1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentNot evaluated0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentGained gross or fine motor skills4 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentContinued motor loss0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard TreatmentNo change2 participants
Primary

Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard Treatment

Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; respiratory decline as measured by change in ventilator use is summarized in this outcome. Ventilator use might have improved (less use of ventilator support), had no change, or worsened (more use of ventilator support). Each participant served as his or her own control.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All participants who enrolled due to decline in respiratory function while on standard treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentImproved0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentNo change (on invasive ventilator for 24 hrs)0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentWorsened0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentNot evaluated1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentNot evaluated0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentImproved0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentWorsened0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekParticipants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard TreatmentNo change (on invasive ventilator for 24 hrs)1 participants
Primary

Summary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment Period

Overall safety summary of participants experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), treatment-related AEs, and Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs). Summary is based on Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as AEs that occurred following the initiation of study treatment.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 52

Population: Safety population comprised of all participants who received intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodParticipants with AEs6 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodRelated AEs0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodNot related AEs6 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodMild AEs6 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodModerate AEs3 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodSevere AEs2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation from study1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodDeaths1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodInfusion Associated Reactions0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodSerious AEs2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodDeaths0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodParticipants with AEs7 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodSevere AEs0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodRelated AEs2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodSerious AEs1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodNot related AEs7 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation from study0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodMild AEs6 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodInfusion Associated Reactions2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekSummary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment PeriodModerate AEs2 participants
Secondary

Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)

Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline. Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Full analysis population of participants with LVMI data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekBaseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)62.1 g/m^2
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekBaseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)56.5 g/m^2
Secondary

Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Scores

Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. Negative values indicate a smaller than mean LVM and values higher than 0 indicate a larger LVM than the mean. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Full analysis population of participants with LVM data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekBaseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Scores0.3 Z-score
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekBaseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Scores-0.3 Z-score
Secondary

Baseline Values for Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Full analysis population of participants \>= 14 years old.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekBaseline Values for Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)31.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekBaseline Values for Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)36.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.33
Secondary

Baseline Values in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI)

The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near 0 reflecting low capability and scores near 100 reflecting high capability.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Full analysis population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekBaseline Values in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI)38.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.94
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekBaseline Values in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI)46.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.26
Secondary

Baseline Values of Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results

The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Full analysis population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekBaseline Values of Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results65.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 60.52
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekBaseline Values of Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results82.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Strength Measured by the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Total Score at Week 52

Body strength is measured by the MMT score on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores representing greater body strength.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population of participants \>= 8 years old. Due to the age restriction and small study population, the number of participants analyzed is too small for results to be meaningful.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) at Week 52

Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment (Week 52). Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population of participants with LVMI data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) at Week 5212.5 g/m^2Full Range 14.44
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) at Week 524.0 g/m^2Full Range 5.95
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Score at Week 52

Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease and positive change from baseline an increase in LVM Z-score. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population of participants with LVM data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Score at Week 520.3 Z-scoreFull Range 1.04
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Score at Week 520.4 Z-scoreFull Range 0.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI) at Week 52

The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Change from baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near 0 reflecting low capability and scores near 100 reflecting high capability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI) at Week 520.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.28
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI) at Week 523.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population of participants \>= 14 years old.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 522.5 units on a scale
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 524.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results at Week 52

The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full analysis population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results at Week 526.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.49
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results at Week 526.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)

The change from baseline in ventilator use at the last assessment is summarized as improved (less use of ventilator support), no change, worsened (increased use of ventilator support), and did not use ventilator support.

Time frame: Baseline, approximately Week 52

Population: Full analysis population. The participant in the worsened category died after week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Did not use ventilator3 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Worsened1 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Improved0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 20 mg/kg Every WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)No change2 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Did not use ventilator4 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)No change3 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Worsened0 participants
Alglucosidase Alfa 40 mg/kg Every Other WeekChange From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)Improved0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026