Skip to content

Ergot and Oxytocin During Cesarean Delivery Following Failure to Progress in Labour

Prophylactic Ergonovine-Oxytocin Versus Oxytocin During Cesarean Delivery Following Failure to Progress in Labour

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00481533
Enrollment
47
Registered
2007-06-01
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2007-01-31
Last updated
2007-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Loss, Surgical

Keywords

Cesarean Delivery, Uterine Contractility

Brief summary

Despite of marked improvements in clinical management, early postpartum hemorrhage(PPH)remains a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality both in developing countries and in hospitals equipped with all that modern medicine has to offer. This complication is amongst the most challenging that a clinician will face in the obstetric patient. Prevention, early recognition and prompt appropriate intervention are the keys to minimizing the impact of PPH on women's health. Patients undergoing Cesarean sections following failure to progress in labor are at great risk for PPH and should theoretically benefit from an additional uterotonic agent. This study will be conducted to define whether the addition of ergonovine maleate to oxytocin, administered in a prophylactic way, reduces blood loss during Cesarean section for failure to progress in labor.

Detailed description

Despite of marked improvements in management, early postpartum hemorrhage(PPH)remains a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality both in developing countries and in hospitals equipped with all that modern medicine has to offer. This complication is amongst the most challenging that a clinician will face in Obstetrics. Prevention, early recognition and prompt appropriate intervention are the keys to minimizing the impact of PPH on women's health. Prophylactic oxytocin, commonly administered after fetal and placental delivery, has been shown to reduce the incidence of PPH. The main advantages of this drug are its rapid onset of action and the fact that it does not cause elevations of blood pressure or tetanic contractions like ergonovine. The effect of oxytocin is limited by the number and status of the oxytocin receptors. Increases in the dose of oxytocin will not necessarily improve uterine contraction, if receptors are not adequate in quantity and quality.This is the cause of patients exposed to oxytocin for labor augmentation, in whom oxytocin receptors are known to reduce both number and response to oxytocin. Therefore, a different uterotonic agent, involving a different mechanism of action should be used instead. Alternative drugs include ergot derivatives and prostaglandins (carboprost and misoprostol). Although protection from PPH with ergot derivatives and prostaglandin appear to be similar, prostaglandins are associated with more side effects. Patients undergoing Cesarean sections following failure to progress in labor are at great risk for PPH and should theoretically benefit from an additional uterotonic agent. This study will be conducted to define whether the addition of ergonovine maleate to oxytocin, administered in a prophylactic way, reduces blood loss during Cesarean section for failure to progress in labor.

Interventions

DRUGMethyl-Ergonovine-Oxytocin
DRUGOxytocin

Sponsors

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cesarean section secondary to failure to progress in labour * First stage of labour * Received oxytocin for at least 4 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Require General Anesthesia * Cardiac Disease * Hypertension * Predisposition to uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Blood lossDuring surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effectiveness of Uterine ContractionDuring surgery
Side EffectsDuring surgery

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026