Skip to content

A Study to Test the Safety and Efficacy of MK0249 in Patients With ADHD (0249-018)(COMPLETED)

A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Incomplete Block, Two-period, Crossover Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of MK0249, 10 mg, for Adult Patients, Ages 18 to 55, With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00475735
Enrollment
72
Registered
2007-05-21
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2015-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of an investigational treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) when compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGMK0249

MK-0249, 10 mg per day was taken orally daily. If patients were unable to tolerate 10 mg per day, they were allowed to titrate down to 5 mg per day.

DRUGConcerta (methylphenidate)

Titration of Concerta began with two 18-mg capsules (36 mg) for 3 consecutive days, followed by three 18-mg capsules (54 mg) for another 3 consecutive days, ending with four 18-mg capsules (72 mg) for the remainder of the treatment period. If patients were unable to tolerate 72 mg per day, they were allowed to titrate down to 54 mg per day. Concerta was taken orally once daily.

DRUGPlacebo

For 4 of the 6 treatment sequences, patients had one 4-week treatment period with placebo of MK-0249 (tablets) and placebo of Concerta (capsules). For patients assigned to active treatments of MK-0249 or Concerta, in order to preserve the blind, placebo of the non-active component was provided, ie, if MK was assigned (tablets), then placebo of Concerta (capsules) was also provided. Each patient was to dose with tablets and capsules, either active or placebo. Placebo was taken orally once daily.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is between 18 and 55 years of age (inclusive) * Patient is an adult with a current DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD of inattentive or combined subtype, as assessed via a structured interview using the ACDS and AISRS * Females of child-bearing potential must use acceptable methods of birth control during the study and for 1 month post-therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of a neurological disorder resulting in ongoing impairment * Patient has a lifetime history of a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder * Patient has evidence of ongoing depression * Patient is sensitive or allergic to methylphenidate * Patient has glaucoma * Patient has a previous history of narrowing or blockage of the GI tract * Patient has a history of a sleep disorder (e.g., insomnia, sleep apnea, nightmares, or night terrors) within 6 months prior to screening * Patient has a history of a cardiovascular disorder within 6 months prior to screening * Patient has moderate or severe persistent asthma * Patient has a history of substance abuse or dependence not in sustained full remission for at least one year according to DSM-IV * Patient has taken part in a research study within the past 30 days of signing informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatmentafter 4 weeks of treatmentThe AISRS total score consists of 18 items from the original Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) which were derived based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-4 (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. The ADHD-RS include 9 items that address symptoms of inattention and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the AISRS Inattentive Subscale Score After 4 Weeks of Treatmentafter 4 weeks of treatmentThe AISRS inattentive subscale score consists of 9 items from the original ADHD-RS which address inattention. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS inattentive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD inattentiveness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.
>/= 30% AISRS Total Score Responder Rate After 4 Weeks of Treatment;after 4 weeks of treatmentThe AISRS total score consists of 18 items from the original ADHD-RS which were derived based on DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. The ADHD-RS include 9 items that address symptoms of inattention and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.
>/=1-point Improvement in the CGI-S Score4 weeks of treatmentThe Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) is administered by a trained investigator who rates the severity of a patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the investigator's past experience with patients who have an ADHD diagnosis. The scores range from 1 to 7. Higher numbers correspond to more severe illness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Observer Screening Version (CAARS-O:SV) Total ADHD Symptom Score.4 weeks of treatmentConners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Observer Screening version (CAARS-O: SV) evaluates DSM-IV-oriented inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity as well as measures of self-concept. It is a 30-item scale administered by a trained investigator or rater with cue questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptoms. The total score can range from 0 to 90. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-severity of Illness Scale(CGI-S) Score4 weeks of treatmentThe Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) is administered by a trained investigator who rates the severity of a patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the investigator's past experience with patients who have an ADHD diagnosis. The scores range from 1 to 7. Higher numbers correspond to more severe illness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.
Mean Change From Baseline in the AISRS Hyperactive/Impulsive Subscale Score4 weeks of treatmentThe Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) hyperactive/impulsive subscale score consists of 9 items from the original Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) which address hyperactivity and impulsivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS hyperactive/impulsive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD hyperactivity/impulsivity. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline AISRSBaselineBaseline values for all treatment groups are equal because the constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model was used (Liang and Zeger, 2000, Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 62, 134-148).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Patient Dosed: 16 AUG 2007; Last Patient Last Treatment: 04 APR 2008. Six U.S. study centers.

Pre-assignment details

Pre-Treatment consisted of 2 visits: Screening Visit1 & Baseline Randomization Visit2. Patients continuing after Visit1 entered a 1-wk placebo Run-in period. At Visit2, patients were assessed using the protocol eligibility criteria. Then, if deemed eligible, patients were randomized at Visit2 to one of six 2-period cross-over treatment sequences.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MK-0249 Then Placebo
These participants received MK-0249 during Treatment Period 1 and placebo during Treatment Period 2
14
Placebo Then MK-0249
These participants received placebo during Treatment Period 1 and MK-0249 during Treatment Period 2
13
MK-0249 Then Concerta
These participants received MK-0249 during Treatment Period 1 and Concerta during Treatment Period 2
7
Concerta Then MK-0249
These participants received Concerta during Treatment Period 1 and MK-0249 during Treatment Period 2
7
Concerta Then Placebo
These participants received Concerta during Treatment Period 1 and placebo during Treatment Period 2
16
Placebo Then Concerta
These participants received placebo during Treatment Period 1 and Concerta during Treatment Period 2
15
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Treatment Period 1Adverse Event200000
Treatment Period 1DC due to AE but continuing000122
Treatment Period 1DC due to no efficacy but Continuing010000
Treatment Period 1Lack of Efficacy100000
Treatment Period 1Lost to Follow-up000001
Treatment Period 1Protocol Violation000100
Treatment Period 1Withdrawal by Subject110000
Treatment Period 2Adverse Event010200
Treatment Period 2Lack of Efficacy000001
Treatment Period 2Withdrawal by Subject000010
Treatment WashoutLost to Follow-up010000
Treatment WashoutProtocol Violation010000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMK-0249 Then PlaceboPlacebo Then MK-0249MK-0249 Then ConcertaConcerta Then MK-0249Concerta Then PlaceboPlacebo Then ConcertaTotal
Age, Continuous39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants7 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants9 Participants5 Participants2 Participants13 Participants8 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 3733 / 4433 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 440 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment

The AISRS total score consists of 18 items from the original Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) which were derived based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-4 (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. The ADHD-RS include 9 items that address symptoms of inattention and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD.

Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients with at least one assessment (baseline or post-randomization) were included in the FAS. Missing data were handled using the data as observed (DAO) approach.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0249Mean Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment-9.8 score on scale
ConcertaMean Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment-15.3 score on scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment-7.6 score on scale
p-value: 0.341Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

>/=1-point Improvement in the CGI-S Score

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) is administered by a trained investigator who rates the severity of a patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the investigator's past experience with patients who have an ADHD diagnosis. The scores range from 1 to 7. Higher numbers correspond to more severe illness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.

Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary

>/= 30% AISRS Total Score Responder Rate After 4 Weeks of Treatment;

The AISRS total score consists of 18 items from the original ADHD-RS which were derived based on DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. The ADHD-RS include 9 items that address symptoms of inattention and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.

Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the AISRS Hyperactive/Impulsive Subscale Score

The Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) hyperactive/impulsive subscale score consists of 9 items from the original Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) which address hyperactivity and impulsivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS hyperactive/impulsive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD hyperactivity/impulsivity. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination

Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the AISRS Inattentive Subscale Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment

The AISRS inattentive subscale score consists of 9 items from the original ADHD-RS which address inattention. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS inattentive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD inattentiveness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.

Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-severity of Illness Scale(CGI-S) Score

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) is administered by a trained investigator who rates the severity of a patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the investigator's past experience with patients who have an ADHD diagnosis. The scores range from 1 to 7. Higher numbers correspond to more severe illness. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.

Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Observer Screening Version (CAARS-O:SV) Total ADHD Symptom Score.

Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Observer Screening version (CAARS-O: SV) evaluates DSM-IV-oriented inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity as well as measures of self-concept. It is a 30-item scale administered by a trained investigator or rater with cue questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptoms. The total score can range from 0 to 90. Data not reported due to failure of primary hypothesis and program termination.

Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

Other Pre-specified

Baseline AISRS

Baseline values for all treatment groups are equal because the constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model was used (Liang and Zeger, 2000, Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 62, 134-148).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients with at least one assessment (baseline or post-randomization) were included in the FAS. Missing data were handled using the data as observed (DAO) approach.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
MK-0249Baseline AISRS34.6 score on scaleStandard Error 2.8
ConcertaBaseline AISRS34.6 score on scaleStandard Error 2.8
PlaceboBaseline AISRS34.6 score on scaleStandard Error 2.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026