Skip to content

5-Alpha Reductase and Anabolic Effects of Testosterone

5-Alpha Reductase and Anabolic Effects of Testosterone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00475501
Enrollment
60
Registered
2007-05-21
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2018-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostate Hypertrophy, Male Hypogonadism, Muscle Atrophy, Sarcopenia

Keywords

anabolic effects, finasteride, male hypogonadism, sarcopenia, testosterone

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a higher-than-replacement dose of testosterone and finasteride can be combined to safely increase muscle strength in older men who have a low blood concentration of testosterone.

Detailed description

Approximately 40% of older male veterans have a low serum testosterone concentration. The latter is associated with diminished muscle strength and bone mineral density, depressed mood, low pain tolerance, frailty, and increased mortality. Replacement doses of testosterone have been administered to hypogonadal men for the purpose of reversing deficits in muscle and bone. Although testosterone is clearly important for maintaining muscle and bone in men, there are problems associated with T replacement. First, testosterone causes a number of undesired effects, including fluid retention, gynecomastia, worsening of sleep apnea, polycythemia, prostate enlargement and acceleration of early-stage prostate cancer. The anabolic effects obtained to date from testosterone replacement have been relatively modest, especially in older men. Our hypothesis is that combined treatment with a higher-than-replacement dose of testosterone and a 5- reductase inhibitor will produce substantial anabolic effects, while preventing testosterone-induced prostate enlargement and possibly other adverse effects. We plan to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with testosterone and finasteride in older hypogonadal male veterans by conducting a 12-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We will administer a higher-than-replacement dose of testosterone plus the 5- reductase inhibitor finasteride to a group of hypogonadal, but otherwise healthy older men. We will determine whether this treatment is a safe and effective means to increase muscle mass and strength. Men aged 60 to 80, with circulating total testosterone 300 ng/dL or bioavailable testosterone 70 ng/dL, will be treated with 125 mg testosterone enanthate/week 5 mg finasteride/day for 1 year. We will assess the effects on body composition, 1- repetition maximum (1-RM) strength, grip strength, functional reach, bone mineral density, mood, cognition, hematopoiesis and prostate volume. We have chosen a moderately high dose of testosterone that may cause some adverse effects. We predict that finasteride will not block the anabolic effects of testosterone, but will block any prostate enlargement or symptoms and possibly other adverse effects as well.

Interventions

DRUGTestosterone Enanthate

125 mg, i.m. injection, once/week, for 52 weeks

DRUGFinasteride

5 mg, oral, once/day, for 52 weeks

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Endo Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 60 years males * Primary care at the Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida. * Consenting subjects who have a morning (between 6:00 AM and 10:00 AM) serum total testosterone 300 ng/dL or bioavailable testosterone concentration 70 ng/dL and no

Exclusion criteria

will be randomized to receive either testosterone or placebo.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months1-RM strength testing for 5 exercises will be performed using dynamic resistance exercise machines. Testing will be performed before treatment (baseline), at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Densitybaseline, 12 monthsDual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA): We will assess bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition using a fan-bean densitometer (Lunar Prodigy, General Electric Medical Systems).
Geriatric Depression Scalebaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsGeriatric Depression Scale (GDS): This 15-item, yes/no questionnaire will be administered at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. The minimum score is 0 = no depressive symptoms The maximum score is 15 = a very high level of depressive symptoms
30 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) Testbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsRey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) test is a widely used standardized neuropsychological test for assessing visuospatial constructional functions, visuographic memory, and some aspects of planning. The drawing is scored by a blinded neuropsychologist on a scale of 0 to 30 with 30 representing a perfect drawing.
Trail-Making Test, Part Abaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsTrail-Making Test, Part A: is a standardized test of cognitive function which specifically assesses working memory, visual processing, visual spatial skills, selective and divided attention, and psychomotor coordination. the test is scored as seconds required to successful completion of the task with a lower score representing better performance. The mean score on test is 30.75 second with a standard deviation of 16.27.
Grip Strength kgbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsGrip strength in the dominant arm will be measured by using a dynamometer. Testing will be performed at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment.
Hematocritbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsHematocrit was assessed as a part of routine blood analysis at the indicated time points.
Dietary Protein Intakebaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsDietary protein intake will be assessed using a 3-day food log and subjects will be counseled to increase protein intake if needed using the guide Healthy Ways to Eat More Protein.
Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatebaseline, 6 month, 12 monthsTransrectal ultrasound sizing of prostate will be performed using the B&K Diagnostic System 3535, with 7 mega hertz transrectal probe at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment.
Life Satisfactionbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsLife Satisfaction: is a written test of psychological well-being that will be performed at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. This is a 20-point scale, with a possible range of scores from 0 to 20. A higher score represents greater life satisfaction.
Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Testbaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsBenton Judgment of Line Orientation Test is a standardized test with 30 items that is specific for visual spatial cognition. Tests will be administered at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. The minimum score is 0, indicating low visual spatial cognition. The maximum score is 30, indicating high visual spatial cognition

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited between 7/2/2007 and 10/13/2010. Subjects responded to letters mailed to male patients aged 60 years or more who were seen at VA clinics.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were excluded if they failed brief cognitive testing (MiniCog), if serum testosterone \> 300 ng/dL or less and bio-testosterone \> 70 ng/dL, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, hematocrit (HCT) \> 49%, prostate specific antigen (PSA) \> 2.6 ng/ml, were taking coumadin or had orthopedic limitations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Testosterone Vehicle
125 mg testosterone enanthate/week i.m. daily placebo pill
14
Vehicle Finasteride
weekly vehicle injection 5 mg finasteride/day p.o.
13
Testosterone Finasteride
125 mg testosterone enanthate/week i.m. 5 mg finasteride/day p.o.
17
Vehicle Placebo
weekly vehicle injection daily placebo pill
16
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTestosterone VehicleVehicle FinasterideTestosterone FinasterideVehicle PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
68.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.29
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants13 Participants17 Participants16 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 141 / 132 / 170 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 142 / 130 / 171 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

1 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testing

1-RM strength testing for 5 exercises will be performed using dynamic resistance exercise machines. Testing will be performed before treatment (baseline), at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 11 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 9-months change kg14.416 kgStandard Error 2.63
Arm 11 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 3-months change kg9.192 kgStandard Error 1.978
Arm 11 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 12-months change kg14.773 kgStandard Error 7.03
Arm 11 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 6-months change kg10.227 kgStandard Error 1.66
Arm 11 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press baseline Kg129.1 kgStandard Error 9.08
Arm 21 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 6-months change kg-1.136 kgStandard Error 4.095
Arm 21 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 9-months change kg-5.55 kgStandard Error 4.95
Arm 21 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 12-months change kg0 kgStandard Error 2.629
Arm 21 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 3-months change kg-1.34 kgStandard Error 3.126
Arm 21 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press baseline Kg109.4 kgStandard Error 7.87
Arm 31 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 6-months change kg13.778 kgStandard Error 4.1
Arm 31 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press baseline Kg137.2 kgStandard Error 5.8
Arm 31 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 3-months change kg9.679 kgStandard Error 3.16
Arm 31 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 9-months change kg10.49 kgStandard Error 3.1
Arm 31 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 12-months change kg12.5 kgStandard Error 3.88
Arm 41 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 9-months change kg2.02 kgStandard Error 2.636
Arm 41 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 3-months change kg-2.44 kgStandard Error 2.22
Arm 41 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press baseline Kg118.8 kgStandard Error 8.825
Arm 41 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 6-months change kg2.727 kgStandard Error 3.66
Arm 41 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Strength Testingleg press 12-months change kg1.515 kgStandard Error 3.47
Comparison: The studies was powered for 1-RM strength based on a 1.18-alpha increase reported in the literaturep-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.86, 18]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

30 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) Test

Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) test is a widely used standardized neuropsychological test for assessing visuospatial constructional functions, visuographic memory, and some aspects of planning. The drawing is scored by a blinded neuropsychologist on a scale of 0 to 30 with 30 representing a perfect drawing.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 130 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 9 month15.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.06
Arm 130 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 3 month16.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.25
Arm 130 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 12 month16.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.91
Arm 130 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 6 month15.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Arm 130 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey baseline12.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
Arm 230 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 6 month16.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.04
Arm 230 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 9 month15.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.27
Arm 230 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 12 month15 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.56
Arm 230 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 3 month12.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Arm 230 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey baseline13.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
Arm 330 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 6 month17.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.55
Arm 330 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey baseline12.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
Arm 330 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 3 month16.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Arm 330 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 9 month18.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Arm 330 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 12 month19.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.98
Arm 430 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 9 month15.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.45
Arm 430 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 3 month12.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Arm 430 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey baseline12.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.58
Arm 430 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 6 month14 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Arm 430 Minute Recall Portion of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) TestRey 12 month16.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.77
Comparison: The study was not powered for 30-minute recall on Rey figure testp-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.699, 5.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test

Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test is a standardized test with 30 items that is specific for visual spatial cognition. Tests will be administered at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. The minimum score is 0, indicating low visual spatial cognition. The maximum score is 30, indicating high visual spatial cognition

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 9 months25.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Arm 1Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 3 months25.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Arm 1Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 12 months25.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Arm 1Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 6 months25.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Arm 1Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton baseline24.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
Arm 2Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 6 months25.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Arm 2Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 9 months23.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Arm 2Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 12 months25.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
Arm 2Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 3 months25.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Arm 2Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton baseline24.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Arm 3Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 6 months26.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Arm 3Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton baseline25.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
Arm 3Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 3 months25.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Arm 3Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 9 months25.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Arm 3Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 12 months26.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Arm 4Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 9 months24.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
Arm 4Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 3 months25.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
Arm 4Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton baseline24.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Arm 4Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 6 months25.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
Arm 4Benton Judgment of Line Orientation TestBenton 12 months24.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.88
Comparison: The study was not powered for score on Benton testp-value: 0.43395% CI: [-0.869, 2.043]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Dietary Protein Intake

Dietary protein intake will be assessed using a 3-day food log and subjects will be counseled to increase protein intake if needed using the guide Healthy Ways to Eat More Protein.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 9 months1.15 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.08
Arm 1Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 3 months0.87 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.16
Arm 1Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 12 months n = 1,1,2,51.18 gm/body weight (kg)
Arm 1Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 6 months0.74 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.07
Arm 1Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake baseline0.97 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.1
Arm 2Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 6 months1.27 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.49
Arm 2Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 9 months1.20 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.3
Arm 2Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 12 months n = 1,1,2,50.74 gm/body weight (kg)
Arm 2Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 3 months0.94 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.15
Arm 2Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake baseline1.06 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.08
Arm 3Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 6 months1.05 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.18
Arm 3Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake baseline0.99 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.13
Arm 3Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 3 months1.49 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.18
Arm 3Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 9 months1.26 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.3
Arm 3Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 12 months n = 1,1,2,51.39 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.6
Arm 4Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 9 months0.82 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.09
Arm 4Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 3 months1.12 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.16
Arm 4Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake baseline1.00 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.06
Arm 4Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 6 months0.93 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.18
Arm 4Dietary Protein Intakeprotein intake 12 months n = 1,1,2,51.05 gm/body weight (kg)Standard Error 0.18
Comparison: The study was not powered for dietary protein intakep-value: 0.621995% CI: [-0.353, 6.37]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Geriatric Depression Scale

Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): This 15-item, yes/no questionnaire will be administered at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. The minimum score is 0 = no depressive symptoms The maximum score is 15 = a very high level of depressive symptoms

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 9 months0.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Arm 1Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 3 months1.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
Arm 1Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 12 months3.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Arm 1Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 6 months1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
Arm 1Geriatric Depression Scaledepression baseline2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
Arm 2Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 6 months2.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Arm 2Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 9 months1.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
Arm 2Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 12 months2.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Arm 2Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 3 months2.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Arm 2Geriatric Depression Scaledepression baseline3.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Arm 3Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 6 months5.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Arm 3Geriatric Depression Scaledepression baseline4.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.76
Arm 3Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 3 months3.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
Arm 3Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 9 months3.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
Arm 3Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 12 months3.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Arm 4Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 9 months2.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
Arm 4Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 3 months1.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Arm 4Geriatric Depression Scaledepression baseline2.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
Arm 4Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 6 months1.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Arm 4Geriatric Depression Scaledepression 12 months1.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.373
Comparison: The study is was not powered for score on Geriatric Depression Scalep-value: 0.03795% CI: [-1.41, -0.064]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Grip Strength kg

Grip strength in the dominant arm will be measured by using a dynamometer. Testing will be performed at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 6 month kg2.02 kgStandard Error 0.482
Arm 1Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 12 month kg1.909 kgStandard Error 0.249
Arm 1Grip Strength kggrip strength baseline kg17.0 kgStandard Error 1.23
Arm 1Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 9 month kg1.558 kgStandard Error 0.505
Arm 1Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 3 month kg1.66 kgStandard Error 0.427
Arm 2Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 6 month kg0.812 kgStandard Error 1.357
Arm 2Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 3 month kg-0.045 kgStandard Error 0.485
Arm 2Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 12 month kg1.477 kgStandard Error 0.211
Arm 2Grip Strength kggrip strength baseline kg16.9 kgStandard Error 1.28
Arm 2Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 9 month kg1.25 kgStandard Error 0.555
Arm 3Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 3 month kg0.485 kgStandard Error 0.447
Arm 3Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 12 month kg1.174 kgStandard Error 0.302
Arm 3Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 9 month kg1.331 kgStandard Error 0.399
Arm 3Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 6 month kg1.00 kgStandard Error 0.589
Arm 3Grip Strength kggrip strength baseline kg18.2 kgStandard Error 0.513
Arm 4Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 12 month kg0.72 kgStandard Error 0.342
Arm 4Grip Strength kggrip strength baseline kg17.472 kgStandard Error 0.8522
Arm 4Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 3 month kg0.212 kgStandard Error 0.44
Arm 4Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 6 month kg-0.035 kgStandard Error 0.411
Arm 4Grip Strength kgchange grip strength 9 month kg0.152 kgStandard Error 0.415
Comparison: The study was not powered on grip strength. We employed 2x2 analysis to determine effects of testosterone, finasteride and interaction.p-value: 0.01595% CI: [0.16, 1.31]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Hematocrit

Hematocrit was assessed as a part of routine blood analysis at the indicated time points.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Hematocritchange hematocrit 9 months %4.071 % volumeStandard Error 1.303
Arm 1Hematocritchange hematocrit 3 months %3.6 % volumeStandard Error 1.007
Arm 1Hematocritchange hematocrit 12 months %5.22 % volumeStandard Error 0.8498
Arm 1Hematocritchange hematocrit 6 months %4.044 % volumeStandard Error 0.94
Arm 1Hematocrithematocrit baseline %42.6 % volumeStandard Error 0.833
Arm 2Hematocritchange hematocrit 6 months %0.557 % volumeStandard Error 0.758
Arm 2Hematocritchange hematocrit 9 months %0.63 % volumeStandard Error 1.36
Arm 2Hematocritchange hematocrit 12 months %-1.175 % volumeStandard Error 0.984
Arm 2Hematocritchange hematocrit 3 months %0.611 % volumeStandard Error 1.143
Arm 2Hematocrithematocrit baseline %41.2 % volumeStandard Error 1.042
Arm 3Hematocritchange hematocrit 6 months %4.331 % volumeStandard Error 0.7264
Arm 3Hematocrithematocrit baseline %42.0 % volumeStandard Error 0.7
Arm 3Hematocritchange hematocrit 3 months %4.593 % volumeStandard Error 0.627
Arm 3Hematocritchange hematocrit 9 months %3.38 % volumeStandard Error 0.6622
Arm 3Hematocritchange hematocrit 12 months %4.173 % volumeStandard Error 0.8498
Arm 4Hematocritchange hematocrit 9 months %-0.155 % volumeStandard Error 0.52
Arm 4Hematocritchange hematocrit 3 months %-0.06 % volumeStandard Error 0.44
Arm 4Hematocrithematocrit baseline %40.3 % volumeStandard Error 0.975
Arm 4Hematocritchange hematocrit 6 months %0.514 % volumeStandard Error 0.396
Arm 4Hematocritchange hematocrit 12 months %-0.192 % volumeStandard Error 0.667
Comparison: This study was powered for hematocrit based on literature report that testosterone \> 2 alpha increase in hematocritp-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.07, 5.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Life Satisfaction

Life Satisfaction: is a written test of psychological well-being that will be performed at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. This is a 20-point scale, with a possible range of scores from 0 to 20. A higher score represents greater life satisfaction.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 9 months14.75 pointsStandard Error 1.03
Arm 1Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 3 months12.67 pointsStandard Error 0.76
Arm 1Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 12 months15.17 pointsStandard Error 1.11
Arm 1Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 6 months13.70 pointsStandard Error 1.05
Arm 1Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A baseline13.83 pointsStandard Error 1.01
Arm 2Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 6 months14.44 pointsStandard Error 1.65
Arm 2Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 9 months13.44 pointsStandard Error 1.39
Arm 2Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 12 months12.5 pointsStandard Error 1.91
Arm 2Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 3 months12.11 pointsStandard Error 2
Arm 2Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A baseline12.08 pointsStandard Error 1.65
Arm 3Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 6 months11.20 pointsStandard Error 1.59
Arm 3Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A baseline11.35 pointsStandard Error 1.11
Arm 3Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 3 months12.27 pointsStandard Error 1.33
Arm 3Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 9 months11.57 pointsStandard Error 1.35
Arm 3Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 12 months12.17 pointsStandard Error 1.8
Arm 4Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 9 months13.17 pointsStandard Error 1.48
Arm 4Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 3 months14.13 pointsStandard Error 0.91
Arm 4Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A baseline12.69 pointsStandard Error 1.08
Arm 4Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 6 months13.54 pointsStandard Error 1.26
Arm 4Life SatisfactionLife Satisfaction A 12 months13.83 pointsStandard Error 1.38
Comparison: The study was not powered for score on Lif Satisfaction A testp-value: 0.19695% CI: [-3.434, 1.698]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Density

Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA): We will assess bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition using a fan-bean densitometer (Lunar Prodigy, General Electric Medical Systems).

Time frame: baseline, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral DensityL2-L4 spine BMD baseline gm/cc1.03 gm/ccStandard Error 0.041
Arm 1Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Densitychange L2-L4 spine BMD 12 month gm/cc0.049 gm/ccStandard Error 0.017
Arm 2Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Densitychange L2-L4 spine BMD 12 month gm/cc0.002 gm/ccStandard Error 0.006
Arm 2Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral DensityL2-L4 spine BMD baseline gm/cc1.02 gm/ccStandard Error 0.032
Arm 3Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral DensityL2-L4 spine BMD baseline gm/cc0.99 gm/ccStandard Error 0.0167
Arm 3Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Densitychange L2-L4 spine BMD 12 month gm/cc0.053 gm/ccStandard Error 0.017
Arm 4Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral DensityL2-L4 spine BMD baseline gm/cc1.07 gm/ccStandard Error 0.045
Arm 4Lumbar Spine L2-L4 Bone Mineral Densitychange L2-L4 spine BMD 12 month gm/cc-0.020 gm/ccStandard Error 0.011
Comparison: The study was not powered on lumbar spine bone mineral density. We employed a 2x2 analysis for effects ot testosterone, finasteride and interactionp-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.95, 6.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Trail-Making Test, Part A

Trail-Making Test, Part A: is a standardized test of cognitive function which specifically assesses working memory, visual processing, visual spatial skills, selective and divided attention, and psychomotor coordination. the test is scored as seconds required to successful completion of the task with a lower score representing better performance. The mean score on test is 30.75 second with a standard deviation of 16.27.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 9 months31.0 secStandard Error 4.48
Arm 1Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 3 months38.5 secStandard Error 5.24
Arm 1Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 12 months29.17 secStandard Error 6.47
Arm 1Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 6 months32.9 secStandard Error 3.91
Arm 1Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A baseline37.59 secStandard Error 3.58
Arm 2Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 6 months39.0 secStandard Error 5.55
Arm 2Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 9 months38.56 secStandard Error 4.37
Arm 2Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 12 months40.0 secStandard Error 5.48
Arm 2Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 3 months42.1 secStandard Error 5.59
Arm 2Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A baseline46.42 secStandard Error 3.61
Arm 3Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 6 months31.2 secStandard Error 2.1
Arm 3Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A baseline36.65 secStandard Error 2.24
Arm 3Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 3 months33.53 secStandard Error 1.83
Arm 3Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 9 months29.07 secStandard Error 1.73
Arm 3Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 12 months32.5 secStandard Error 2.98
Arm 4Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 9 months43.17 secStandard Error 12.97
Arm 4Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 3 months44.33 secStandard Error 7.12
Arm 4Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A baseline44.0 secStandard Error 6.76
Arm 4Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 6 months36.92 secStandard Error 5.21
Arm 4Trail-Making Test, Part ATrails A 12 months43.75 secStandard Error 13.26
Comparison: The study was not powered for score on Trials A testp-value: 0.77995% CI: [-5.095, 3.811]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostate

Transrectal ultrasound sizing of prostate will be performed using the B&K Diagnostic System 3535, with 7 mega hertz transrectal probe at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment.

Time frame: baseline, 6 month, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatepostate volume baseline cc26.4 ccStandard Error 2.33
Arm 1Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 12 months cc11.42 ccStandard Error 3.9
Arm 1Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 6 months cc7.626 ccStandard Error 1.703
Arm 2Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatepostate volume baseline cc29.7 ccStandard Error 3.395
Arm 2Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 12 months cc-4.93 ccStandard Error 3.3
Arm 2Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 6 months cc-1.984 ccStandard Error 4.31
Arm 3Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 6 months cc-3.927 ccStandard Error 2.25
Arm 3Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatepostate volume baseline cc37.1 ccStandard Error 4.379
Arm 3Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 12 months cc-1.72 ccStandard Error 1.596
Arm 4Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatepostate volume baseline cc36.9 ccStandard Error 3.9
Arm 4Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 12 months cc-2.891 ccStandard Error 2.57
Arm 4Transrectal Ultrasound Sizing of Prostatechange prostate volume 6 months cc-1.474 ccStandard Error 3.147
Comparison: The study was powered for prostate volume based on a literature report that testosterone increases prostate volume 1.85 alpha per year. We employed a 2x2 analysis for effects of testosterone, finasteride and interaction.p-value: 0.005195% CI: [1.73, 8.94]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026