Skip to content

Adequacy and Efficacy of the e2TM Cervical Cell Collector Compared to Standard Spatula/CytoBrush Technique.

Clinical Study Validating the Adequacy, Efficacy, and Safety of the e2TM Cervical Cell Collector Compared to Standard Spatula/CytoBrush Technique In Patients With Recent History of Abnormal Pap Test Returning for Colposcopy/Biopsy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00474968
Enrollment
737
Registered
2007-05-17
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2009-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biopsy, Colposcopy

Brief summary

A clinical study to determine the adequacy and efficacy of the InPath e2TM Collector compared to the FDA-approved spatula/cytobrush when used as the cell collection device in screening for cervical cancer. The InPath e2TM Collector name has been changed to the CytoCore SoftPAP(R) Collector

Detailed description

The e2TM (SoftPAP) Collector collects only cells that have been exfoliated from the cervix whereas spatulas, brushes and broom-style collection devices collect cells by scraping or abrading the cervix. THis trial is to determine whether the purely exfoliated sample collected using the e2TM Collector is equivalent to samples obtained by scraping or abrading the cervix for purposes of cervical cancer screening and HPV detection.

Interventions

DEVICEe2 Cell Collector [SoftPAP(R)]

Cervical cells collected using the e2 Cell Collector \[SoftPAP(R)\]

DEVICESpatula/Brush

Cervical cells collected using a combination of a cervical spatula and an endocervical brush

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
CytoCore, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women ages 18 years old and above * Women scheduled to undergo colposcopy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have had a hysterectomy * Patients who are pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cell Collection EfficacyAt the time of cell collection.True Positive (TP); True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) participants and percentage of participants based upon comparison of the cytology diagnosis (Dx) with biopsy (Bx) and endocervical curretage (ECC) results from the same patient.
Specimen AdequacyAt time of cell collectionNumber and percentage of samples classified as adequate for diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyAt the time of cell collection.Number and percentage of HPV positive specimens by the Hybrid Capture II (HC-II) assay

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients presenting for a previously scheduled colposcopy subsequent to an abnormal Pap result were recruited for this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SoftPAP
Samples collected using the SoftPAP Collector
366
Brush/Spatula
Samples collected using an endocervical brush and cervical spatula
371
Total737

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation98
Overall StudySample not collected11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject87

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSoftPAPBrush/SpatulaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
366 Participants365 Participants731 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
366 participants371 participants737 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
366 Participants371 Participants737 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3480 / 355
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3480 / 355

Outcome results

Primary

Cell Collection Efficacy

True Positive (TP); True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) participants and percentage of participants based upon comparison of the cytology diagnosis (Dx) with biopsy (Bx) and endocervical curretage (ECC) results from the same patient.

Time frame: At the time of cell collection.

Population: 79/348 (Arm 1) and 81/355 (Arm 2) participants were excluded from the sensitivity/specificity analysis due to biopsy (Bx) and/or endocervical curettage (ECC) results not being reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SoftPAPCell Collection EfficacyTrue Negative (TN) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))33 Participants
SoftPAPCell Collection EfficacyFalse Negative (FN) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))20 Participants
SoftPAPCell Collection EfficacyFalse Positive (FP) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))42 Participants
SoftPAPCell Collection EfficacyExcluded - Bx/ECC results not reported79 Participants
SoftPAPCell Collection EfficacyTrue Positive (TP) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC)174 Participants
Brush/SpatulaCell Collection EfficacyExcluded - Bx/ECC results not reported81 Participants
Brush/SpatulaCell Collection EfficacyTrue Positive (TP) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC)170 Participants
Brush/SpatulaCell Collection EfficacyTrue Negative (TN) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))14 Participants
Brush/SpatulaCell Collection EfficacyFalse Positive (FP) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))63 Participants
Brush/SpatulaCell Collection EfficacyFalse Negative (FN) (Cytology Dx vs (Bx + ECC))27 Participants
Primary

Specimen Adequacy

Number and percentage of samples classified as adequate for diagnosis

Time frame: At time of cell collection

Population: Includes all cytology specimens

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SoftPAPSpecimen AdequacySatisfactory for Diagnosis343 Participants
SoftPAPSpecimen AdequacyUnsatisfactory for Diagnosis4 Participants
SoftPAPSpecimen AdequacyExcluded - Slide Preparation Error1 Participants
Brush/SpatulaSpecimen AdequacyExcluded - Slide Preparation Error1 Participants
Brush/SpatulaSpecimen AdequacySatisfactory for Diagnosis352 Participants
Brush/SpatulaSpecimen AdequacyUnsatisfactory for Diagnosis2 Participants
Secondary

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection Frequency

Number and percentage of HPV positive specimens by the Hybrid Capture II (HC-II) assay

Time frame: At the time of cell collection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SoftPAPHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHPV Positive by Hybrid Capture-II165 Participants
SoftPAPHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHPV Negative by Hybrid Capture-II82 Participants
SoftPAPHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHybrid Capture-II Results Not Reported101 Participants
Brush/SpatulaHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHPV Positive by Hybrid Capture-II214 Participants
Brush/SpatulaHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHPV Negative by Hybrid Capture-II104 Participants
Brush/SpatulaHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV) Detection FrequencyHybrid Capture-II Results Not Reported37 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026