Skip to content

Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Statins and Ezetimibe

Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00474123
Enrollment
78
Registered
2007-05-16
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2010-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stable Angina

Keywords

angina, atherosclerosis, simvastatin, ezetimibe, inflammation

Brief summary

Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin. The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).

Detailed description

Introduction Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of \<70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects. Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.

Interventions

DRUGSimvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks

Simvastatin 80 mg/day, single dose, for 6 weeks.

DRUGEzetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable angina * Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 70-160 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

* Renal failure * Age\>80 * Simvastatin current treatment\>20mg * Hepatic disease * Inflammatory diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interleukin-6Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1Change from baseline at 6 weeksSerum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).
Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1Change from baseline at 6 weeksserum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)
Soluble CD40 LigandFasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).
C-reactive ProteinChange from baseline at 6 weeksSerum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolChange from baseline at 6 weeksSerum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.
Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100Change from baseline at 6 weeksSamples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TriglycerideFasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.
Endothelial Progenitor CellsFasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors.
LDL CholesterolFasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From July 2006 to January 2009, we randomized 78 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with LDL-C \> 70 mg/dl, Angiographically documented CAD, stable angina, and age between 18 and 80 years. Patients were assigned randomly to two groups. The one group received Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg the one other received Simvastatin 80 mg.

Pre-assignment details

No wash-out period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Simvastatin 80 mg
Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks
38
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
40
Total78

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSimvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgSimvastatin 80 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants35 Participants72 Participants
Age Continuous64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
40 participants38 participants78 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants20 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

C-reactive Protein

Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).

Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Simvastatin 80 mgC-reactive Protein-16 Percentage
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgC-reactive Protein-11 Percentage
Comparison: The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.p-value: 0.3Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Interleukin-6

A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.

Time frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Simvastatin 80 mgInterleukin-60 percentage
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgInterleukin-60 percentage
Primary

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).

Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgMonocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-111 percentageStandard Deviation 47
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgMonocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-110 percentageStandard Deviation 21
Comparison: The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.p-value: 0.85ANCOVA
Primary

Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.

Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgOxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-18 PercentageStandard Deviation 47
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgOxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-15 PercentageStandard Deviation 33
Comparison: The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.p-value: 0.65ANCOVA
Primary

Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100

Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.

Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgPlatelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-10027 PercentageStandard Deviation 43
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgPlatelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-1008 PercentageStandard Deviation 33
Comparison: The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.p-value: 0.02ANCOVA
Primary

Soluble CD40 Ligand

A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).

Time frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgSoluble CD40 Ligand6 percentageStandard Deviation 43
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgSoluble CD40 Ligand6 percentageStandard Deviation 34
Primary

Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1

serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)

Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgSoluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-110 percentageStandard Deviation 14
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgSoluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-110 percentageStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors.

Time frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgEndothelial Progenitor Cells0.4 percentageStandard Deviation 1.7
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgEndothelial Progenitor Cells0.1 percentageStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

LDL Cholesterol

Time frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgLDL Cholesterol-28 percentageStandard Deviation 30
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgLDL Cholesterol-29 percentageStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Triglyceride

Time frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin 80 mgTriglyceride-4 percentageStandard Deviation 32
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgTriglyceride-14 percentageStandard Deviation 31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026