Skip to content

Superficial, Cervical Block in Thyroid Surgery, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact and Cost Efficiency of Bilateral, Superficial Cervical Block in Thyroid Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00472446
Enrollment
183
Registered
2007-05-11
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2016-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thyroidectomy

Keywords

Surgery, Thyroid gland, cervical block, Pain, Postoperative

Brief summary

The study investigates the impact on post-operative pain of the superficial cervical block with bupivacaine combined with subcutaneous infiltration of the incisional area in thyroid surgery under general anesthesia. In addition, cost savings using the cervical block are evaluated (due to reduced length of hospital stay). The study is prospective, randomized, double blind, and placebo-controlled. The study is performed at the Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen.

Interventions

DRUGbilateral superficial cervical block

10 ml of 5% bupivacaine (Carbostesin®) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.

DRUGplacebo bilateral superficial cervical block

10 ml of saline (the carrier of bupivacaine in the experimental treatment) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.

Sponsors

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective thyroid or combined thyroid/parathyroid surgery, restricted to the central cervical compartment * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Intolerance to used medication * Recurrent disease * Neck dissection, sternotomy * Emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale6 hours after surgeryPatient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)
Pooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS4 days after surgeryPain was obtained using the visual analog scale (VAS) three times daily for the 4 postoperative days (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) The pooled relative treatment effect is the probability of values being higher in one group than in another group (ranging from 0 to 1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale24 hours after surgeryPatient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)
Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics5 days after surgerynumber of participants taking post-operative analgetics
Mean Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics5 days after surgerymean pooled dose of post-operative analgetics
Hospital Stay90 daystime from surgery to Hospital release in days

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cervivcal Block Before Surgery
bilateral superficial cervical block placed before surgery (just before skin incision) bilateral superficial cervical block: 10 ml of 5% bupivacaine (Carbostesin®) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
41
Cervivcal Block After Surgery
bilateral superficial cervical block placed after surgery (just after skin closure) bilateral superficial cervical block: 10 ml of 5% bupivacaine (Carbostesin®) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
41
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before Surgery
placebo bilateral superficial cervical block placed before surgery (just before skin incision) placebo bilateral superficial cervical block: 10 ml of saline (the carrier of bupivacaine in the experimental treatment) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
38
Placebo Cervivcal Block After Surgery
placebo bilateral superficial cervical block with saline placed after surgery (just after skin closure) placebo bilateral superficial cervical block: 10 ml of saline (the carrier of bupivacaine in the experimental treatment) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
39
Total159

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0001
Overall StudyQuestionnaires not returned5664
Overall StudyReintervention0011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCervivcal Block Before SurgeryCervivcal Block After SurgeryPlacebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPlacebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryTotal
Age, Continuous49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
duration of surgery140.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.1
130.5 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37
129.6 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.1
141.9 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.4
135.7 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.7
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
41 participants41 participants38 participants39 participants159 participants
resection location
bilateral
23 participants19 participants14 participants13 participants69 participants
resection location
unilateral
18 participants22 participants24 participants26 participants90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants36 Participants29 Participants31 Participants129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants5 Participants9 Participants8 Participants30 Participants
specimen weight60.4 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.1
42.2 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32
51.0 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.6
39.8 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.2
47.0 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 410 / 410 / 380 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 410 / 381 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Pooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS

Pain was obtained using the visual analog scale (VAS) three times daily for the 4 postoperative days (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) The pooled relative treatment effect is the probability of values being higher in one group than in another group (ranging from 0 to 1)

Time frame: 4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS0.47 pooled relative treatment effect
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS0.45 pooled relative treatment effect
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS0.55 pooled relative treatment effect
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS0.54 pooled relative treatment effect
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure between superficial cervical block and placebo treatment (irrespective of timing of treatment)p-value: 0.016Non-parametric ANOVA-type statistic
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure pre-operative versus post-operative applicationp-value: 0.723Non-parametric ANOVA-type statistic
Primary

Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Patient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)

Time frame: 6 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure between superficial cervical block and placebo treatment (irrespective of timing of treatment)p-value: 0.028t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics

number of participants taking post-operative analgetics

Time frame: 5 days after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol21 participants
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole6 participants
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole7 participants
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol23 participants
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol18 participants
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole3 participants
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol24 participants
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryConsumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole7 participants
Comparison: null hypothesis: outcome measure (Proportion of patients taking analgetics) is equal between superficial cervical block and placebo treatment (irrespective of timing)~Proportion taking Paracetamol:p-value: 0.94Fisher Exact
Comparison: null hypothesis: outcome measure (Proportion of patients taking analgetics) is equal between superficial cervical block and placebo treatment (irrespective of timing)~Proportion taking Metamizole:p-value: 0.58Fisher Exact
Secondary

Hospital Stay

time from surgery to Hospital release in days

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryHospital Stay1.8 daysStandard Deviation 0.7
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryHospital Stay1.6 daysStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryHospital Stay2.0 daysStandard Deviation 1.1
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryHospital Stay1.6 daysStandard Deviation 0.6
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure for superficial cervical block versus placebo treatmentp-value: 0.925non-parametric ANOVA-type statistic
Secondary

Mean Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics

mean pooled dose of post-operative analgetics

Time frame: 5 days after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol3.33 gramStandard Deviation 2.43
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole1.25 gramStandard Deviation 0.88
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol3.37 gramStandard Deviation 2.43
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole.93 gramStandard Deviation 0.61
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole2.46 gramStandard Deviation 2.53
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol4.06 gramStandard Deviation 3.19
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsmetamizole1.21 gramStandard Deviation 0.64
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryMean Consumption of Post-operative Analgeticsparacetamol4.33 gramStandard Deviation 3.56
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in pooled dose of analgetics, superficial block versus Placebo~outcome: paracetamolp-value: 0.328Non-parametric ANOVA-type
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in pooled dose of analgetics, superficial block versus Placebo~outcome: metamizolep-value: 0.81Non-parametric ANOVA-type
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure pre-operative and post-operative application~outcome measure: pooled paracetamol dosep-value: 0.331Non-parametric ANOVA-type statistic
Comparison: null hypothesis: no difference in outcome measure pre-operative and post-operative application~outcome measure: pooled metamizole dosep-value: 0.44Non-parametric ANOVA-type statistic
Secondary

Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Patient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)

Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale1.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Placebo Cervivcal Block Before SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Placebo Cervivcal Block After SurgeryPost-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026