Skip to content

Correction of Farsightedness in Children Study

Correction of Hyperopia in Children Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00472212
Acronym
CHICS
Enrollment
58
Registered
2007-05-11
Start date
2003-11-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2023-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Farsightedness, Hyperopia

Brief summary

The Correction of Hyperopia In Children Study (CHICS) is a placebo-controlled, randomized, masked investigation of the effect of spectacle correction for moderate amounts of hyperopia on visual function, attention, and reading skills in children.

Detailed description

Hyperopia (farsightedness) has been reported to be associated with reduced visual perceptual and reading abilities. However, there is controversy regarding whether or not to prescribe for low to moderate amounts of hyperopia. The Correction of Hyperopia In Children Study (CHICS) is a placebo-controlled, randomized, masked investigation of the effect of spectacle correction for moderate amounts of hyperopia on visual function, attention, and reading skills in children.

Interventions

DEVICESpectacles

Hyperopic spectacle lenses

DEVICEControl

Plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses

Sponsors

American Academy of Optometry
CollaboratorOTHER
Transitions
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
College of Optometrists in Vision Development
CollaboratorOTHER
SUNY Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 6-11 years; * At least +1.00D Hyperopia (farsightedness); * \< +4.00D Hyperopia; * \< 1.00D Astigmatism; * \< 1.00D Anisometropia (difference between the two eyes); * Willing to be randomized; * Best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye; * Willing to wear eyeglasses full-time; * Willing to return for follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Previous wear of glasses or contacts for farsightedness/hyperopia; * Eye disease that affects visual function; * Amblyopia (lazy eye); * Strabismus (eye turn); * History of strabismus surgery; * Chronic use of any of the following medications: * Antianxiety agents (Librium, Valium) * Antiarrythmic agents (Cifenline, Cibenzoline) * Anticholinergics (Motion sickness patch - scopolamine) * Bladder spasmolytic (Propiverine) * Chloroquine * Phenothiazines (Compazine, Mellaril, Thorazine) * Tricyclic antidepressants (Elavil, Nortriptyline, Tofranil)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)6 week outcome examThe Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) was used to measure change in reading skill (reading comprehension). The K-TEA is a well-established, individually administered, standardized test for assessment of achievement in reading, with a mean standard score of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher values represent better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Scores as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)6 week outcome examIndividually administered battery designed to measure cognitive processing abilities. CAS is based on PASS (Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive), a well-researched cognitive/neuropsychological theory. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Change in Accommodative Response From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)6 week outcome examAccommodative response, Right eye. This is a measure the accuracy of focusing (accommodative accuracy or response) while the subject views a near target. Lower (positive) values represent better accuracy of focusing.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
Spectacles with hyperopic lenses Spectacles: Hyperopic spectacle lenses
31
Control
Spectacles with placebo lenses Control: Plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
27
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControlGlasses With Hyperopic Lenses
Accommodative Response by monocular estimation method (MEM)0.69 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
0.67 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
0.71 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42
Age, Continuous7.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
7.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
7.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Score99.82 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.25
101.96 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.52
97.83 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.09
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score96.09 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
97.07 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38
95.17 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
35 Participants17 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
17 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants13 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants14 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 310 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)

The Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) was used to measure change in reading skill (reading comprehension). The K-TEA is a well-established, individually administered, standardized test for assessment of achievement in reading, with a mean standard score of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher values represent better performance.

Time frame: 6 week outcome exam

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Glasses With Hyperopic LensesChange in Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)-2.92 score on a scale
ControlChange in Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)0.088 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Accommodative Response From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)

Accommodative response, Right eye. This is a measure the accuracy of focusing (accommodative accuracy or response) while the subject views a near target. Lower (positive) values represent better accuracy of focusing.

Time frame: 6 week outcome exam

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Glasses With Hyperopic LensesChange in Accommodative Response From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)0.23 Diopters
ControlChange in Accommodative Response From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)0.054 Diopters
Secondary

Change in Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Scores as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)

Individually administered battery designed to measure cognitive processing abilities. CAS is based on PASS (Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive), a well-researched cognitive/neuropsychological theory. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: 6 week outcome exam

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Glasses With Hyperopic LensesChange in Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Scores as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)9.14 score on a scale
ControlChange in Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Scores as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)3.46 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026