Skip to content

Forefoot Adduction (FFA) in Infants and Toddlers. Differences of Neuromuscular Activity.

Difference of Neuromuscular Activity in Infants and Toddlers With Foot Dorsiflexion Compare to Infants and Toddlers With Foot Plantarflexion

Status
Suspended
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00470756
Enrollment
20
Registered
2007-05-08
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Forefoot Adduction

Brief summary

Every week we encounter with 5-8 pairs of worried parents of infants with forefoot adduction. Most of them usually need only reassurance and education how to manipulate the deformed foot. During the examination we usually use provocative maneuver to trigger peroneal activity. This manual stimulation usually reveals active eversion and dorsiflexion of the foot in most of the children, but not in all of them. Small part of the children reacts in opposite direction - instead of the typical eversion they demonstrate inversion and some plantar flexion of the foot. We have the impression that this subgroup of children improves the deformity slower and sometime less complete than most of the children. We did not find in the literature any description of this phenomenon. We postulate, that atypically reacting patients probably have different response due to abnormalities of neuromuscular balance between invertors-flexors and evertors-extensors muscle groups. This small subgroup of children may need more close follow-up and probably casting to speed up and secure the improvement of their deformity. Study goals: 1. Evaluate ability of children with FFA to respond on mechanical triggering of peroneal activity 1. The majority of the patients with standard reaction - foot dorsiflexion and eversion (evertors) 2. The minority of the patients with nonstandard reaction - foot plantarflexion and inversion (invertors) 2. Evaluate randomly selected children from each group for character of muscular response on electrical stimulation (EMG) of calf muscles.

Interventions

OTHERmechanical triggering of peroneal activity

mechanical triggering of peroneal activity

Sponsors

Hadassah Medical Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Boys and girls between two months and one year old. 2. Non associated pathology. 3. Signing Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Unwillingness to sign informed consent. 2. Associated pathology

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026