Skip to content

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression

A Comparison of Left vs. Right Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Bipolar Depression

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00470639
Enrollment
0
Registered
2007-05-08
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Depression

Keywords

TMS, Treatment, Bipolar, Efficacy

Brief summary

This is a study to assess the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for depressed adults with bipolar disorder. In rTMS high-intensity, fluctuating magnetic fields non-invasively stimulate the cortex of the brain depolarising neurons. No anaesthetic is required and the treatment in subconvulsive. Recent studies suggest that rTMS can be an effective treatment for depressive illness in adults (Loo and Mitchell et al, 2005) and appears to be quite safe. Most of the published studies to date have focused on unipolar depression. There is limited data of TMS use in bipolar depression. Eg. Pilot study by Nahas Z, Kozel FA, Li X, Anderson B, George MS.in 2003, which was negative. The investigators wish to assess this in a sham-controlled study of adults. The investigators hypothesise that both left and right sided rTMS will have an antidepressant effect superior to sham in this population.

Detailed description

Inpatients and outpatients with major depressive episodes as part of either bipolar I or II illness will be eligible. In the event that patients (in any arm) have no significant response after a defined period, they will shift to an open phase where they will receive left prefrontal 10Hz stimulation. Thus all participants will have the opportunity to receive active treatment.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sponsors

The University of New South Wales
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* DSM-IV Major Depressive Episode of no more than 3 years. * Diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder * Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of 20 or more. * Aged over 18 * May or may not be taking antidepressant medication.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient not able to give informed consent. * Failure to respond to ECT in current episode of depression. * Significant other Axis I psychiatric disorders e.g. schizophrenia. * In imminent physical or psychological danger, or needs rapid clinical response due to inanition, psychosis or high suicide risk. * Comorbid substance abuse or dependence * History of neurological illness e.g. epilepsy; neurosurgical procedure * Metal in the cranium, a pacemaker, cochlear implant, medication pump or other electronic device. * Women of child-bearing age in whom pregnancy cannot be ruled out. * Patients with a history of mood 'switching' in response to other treatments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
All measures at baseline and at the end of each week of treatment in the blind phase and after every 2 weeks of treatment in the open phase.weekly
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Weekly
Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI)Weekly

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Global Improvement scaleWeekly
Young Mania Rating Scaleweekly

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026