Skip to content

A Randomized Study to Evaluate a Novel Method of Specific Allergen Immunotherapy

A Randomized Study to Evaluate a Novel Method of Specific Allergen Immunotherapy in Grass and/or Tree Pollen Allergic Subjects by Intralymphatic Allergen Administration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00470457
Enrollment
156
Registered
2007-05-07
Start date
2001-06-30
Completion date
2005-03-31
Last updated
2015-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinoconjunctivitis Due to Grass Pollen Allergy

Brief summary

Allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only causative treatment of IgE-mediated allergies. The disadvantages of SIT, however, are the requirement of numerous allergen administrations over three to five years, and that the treatment itself causes frequent allergic reactions. We aim at enhancing grass pollen SIT in hay fever patients by injecting the allergen directly into subcutaneous lymph nodes. In a monocentric randomized trial safety and efficacy of intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) with 3 low dose grass pollen extract injections over 2 months are compared to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using 54 injections over 3 years. * Trial with immunodulatory product / biological

Interventions

Sponsors

AlleCure
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * History of allergic rhino-conjunctivitis in spring and summer * Age 18 years to 65 years * Positive skin prick test to grass pollen

Exclusion criteria

* Blood donation within previous 30 days * Surgery within the previous 30 days * Use of investigational drugs within previous 90 days * Pregnancy or nursing * Mastocytosis * Significant cardiovascular disease * Hypertension * Active infectious disease * Significant hepatic disease * Significant renal disease * Significant hematological disorder * Significant pulmonary disease * Moderate or severe asthma * Autoimmune disease * History of malignancy. * Contraindicated medications were immunosuppressive agents, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Safety efficacy and toxicity3 years

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026