Skip to content

Improving Basic and Social Cognition in Veterans With Schizophrenia

Improving Basic and Social Cognition in Veterans With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00470106
Acronym
IBASC
Enrollment
85
Registered
2007-05-07
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2016-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia

Keywords

Cognition, Remediation, Schizophrenia, Social Cognition

Brief summary

Veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder experience very high levels of disability and poor community outcome. Further improvements in community outcome for patients with these disorders will not occur simply through better control of clinical symptoms. Instead, it will be necessary to find treatments that address the key determinants of poor functional outcome. Evidence strongly suggests that basic (non-social) cognitive and social cognitive deficits are among the key determinants of functional outcome for these illnesses. The primary goal of this 2-year pilot study is to implement and validate a new remediation program for social cognition that is appropriate for veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

Detailed description

Veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder experience very high levels of disability and poor community outcome. Further improvements in community outcome for patients with these disorders will not occur simply through better control of clinical symptoms. Instead, it will be necessary to find treatments that address the key determinants of poor functional outcome. Evidence strongly suggests that basic (non-social) cognitive and social cognitive deficits are among the key determinants of functional outcome for these illnesses. The primary goal of this 2-year pilot study is to implement and validate a new remediation program for social cognition that is appropriate for veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. We plan to recruit 72 patients over the 2 years of the study from the outpatient clinics at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VAGLAHS). They will receive baseline assessment that includes measures of social cognition, basic cognition, electrophysiology, functional capacity, clinical symptoms, community status, and demographics / clinical history. Follow up assessments will be administered at the mid-point of training (at 6 weeks) and end of training (at 12 weeks). Each follow up assessment will include measures of basic cognition, social cognition, electrophysiology, functional capacity, and clinical symptoms. The tester administering the assessments will be blind to treatment group. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) social cognitive training, 2) basic cognitive remediation, 3) a combined social cognitive and basic cognitive intervention, or 4) social skills training. All groups will meet in one-hour sessions held twice a week over the course of 12 weeks in small groups of 3-6. The Social Cognition Intervention (SCI) is a new 24-session, manualized intervention program specifically designed to improve emotion perception, social context processing, and theory of mind / attributional bias in veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The Basic Cognitive Intervention (BCI) will involve computer-assisted training exercises. Each participant will work individually on a notebook computer. The combined intervention will cover the same content areas as the social cognitive and basic cognitive interventions, but will not go into as much detail as the separate intervention programs. The control condition will be facilitated discussion of current events. Treatment will be administered in a group format with three to six patients and a training coach.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive remediation

Computer exercises in attention, memory, and speed of processing.

Group training on emotion perception, social perception, and understanding others' mental states.

A combination of the two groups listed above.

BEHAVIORALskills training

Skills training in how to identify symptoms of illness and medication side effects.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients must be diagnosed with Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Psychosis not otherwise specified according to Diagnosis and Statistical Manual-IV criteria. * In addition, the subjects will meet the following criteria: * Between 18 and 60 years of age * Estimated premorbid intelligence quotient \> 70 (based on reading ability) * Understand spoken English sufficiently to comprehend testing procedures * Clinically stable (e.g., no inpatient hospitalization in the 8 weeks prior to enrollment, no significant changes in medication in the 6 weeks prior to enrollment, and none anticipated for the 3 months of participation)

Exclusion criteria

* No clinically significant neurological disease as determined by medical history * No history of serious head injury (e.g., loss of consciousness longer than 1 hour) * No physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of data * No evidence of drug or alcohol dependence in the past six months, and not intoxicated at time of testing * The patients psychotic experiences can be explained solely by the use of drugs or alcohol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.Assessments for end point (12 weeks).This is a test of social cognition that measures the ability to identify the emotion shown in photos of still faces. The construct of interest is facial affect perception. It is an experimental measure and does not have norms or cut-offs. The range of accuracy scores is 0-56 with higher being better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).Assessments at endpoint (12 weeks).This is a role play demonstration test that measures how well someone handles social communication in daily life. The scores reflect overall effectiveness and are the mean number scored across different social situations with a range of 0-5 with higher being better. There are no norms for this test.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at VA Greater Los Angeles Health care system and local mental health facilities. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (not secondary to substance use disorder)

Pre-assignment details

This is not a drug study so there is no wash out or run in. Participants were excluded if they did not meet diagnostic criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Social Cognition
Social Cognitive remediation: Group training on emotion perception, social perception, and understanding others' mental states.
16
Cognitive Remediation
Cognitive remediation: Computer exercises in attention, memory, and speed of processing.
19
Hybrid Group
Half of the sessions were cognitive remediation and half were social cognitive training.
14
Control - Social Skills Training
This group was a control for the amount of time in sessions. There was no social cognitive training.
19
Total68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControl - Social Skills TrainingHybrid GroupCognitive RemediationSocial Cognition
Affect perception39.8 number of correct answers
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
43.4 number of correct answers
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
38.6 number of correct answers
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
40.6 number of correct answers
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
37.1 number of correct answers
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Age, Continuous48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
68 participants19 participants14 participants19 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants15 Participants13 Participants17 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 241 / 210 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 191 / 242 / 213 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.

This is a test of social cognition that measures the ability to identify the emotion shown in photos of still faces. The construct of interest is facial affect perception. It is an experimental measure and does not have norms or cut-offs. The range of accuracy scores is 0-56 with higher being better.

Time frame: Assessments for end point (12 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Social Cognitive Skills TrainingMean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.45.5 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 8.2
Cognitive RemediationMean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.41.1 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 12.1
Hybrid InterventionMean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.43.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 6.7
Skills TrainingMean Test Scores for Facial Emotion Identification.45.1 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 5
p-value: <0.001mixed model
Secondary

Mean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).

This is a role play demonstration test that measures how well someone handles social communication in daily life. The scores reflect overall effectiveness and are the mean number scored across different social situations with a range of 0-5 with higher being better. There are no norms for this test.

Time frame: Assessments at endpoint (12 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Social Cognitive Skills TrainingMean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).3.43 number correctStandard Deviation 0.78
Cognitive RemediationMean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).3.57 number correctStandard Deviation 0.74
Hybrid InterventionMean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).3.35 number correctStandard Deviation 1.11
Skills TrainingMean Test Score From a Test of Functional Capacity (Ability to Perform Daily Activities).3.19 number correctStandard Deviation 0.86
p-value: <0.1mixed model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026