Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant vs Standardized Therapy

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.5mg) Implant Compared to Standardized Therapy in Subjects With Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment of the Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00468871
Enrollment
140
Registered
2007-05-03
Start date
2002-04-30
Completion date
2006-06-30
Last updated
2011-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-infectious Uveitis

Brief summary

This is a 3 year,superiority, multicenter, open-label, randomised controlled safety and efficacy study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (0.59 mg) implant compared to standardized therapy in subjects with unilateral or bilateral, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye.

Interventions

surgical intravitreal implant of fluocinolone acetonide

Systemic corticosteroids alone or combined with immunosuppressants

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and non-pregnant females at least 6 years of age * History of recurrent unilateral or asymmetric non-infectious posterior uveitis of at east 1 year duration not associated with significant systemic activity of the disease * The more severely affected eye having had at least 2 separate recurrences * The more severely affected eye having been treated by systemic therapy for at least one month just before inclusion * Visual acuity (VA) of at least 1.4 logMAR units at enrollment * At time of enrollment, \</=10 anterior chamber cells/HPF and vitrous haze\</= grade 2.

Exclusion criteria

* known allergy or contraindication to fluocinolone acetonide, systemic corticosteroids, or the immunosuppressive agents to be administered * history of retinal detachment, retinoschisis in the area of implantation, or media opacity precluding evaluation of the retina and vitreous * presence or history of uncontrolled IOP while on steroid therapy resulting in loss of vision, or IOP \>25 mm Hg requiring at least 2 types of antiglaucoma medication to be reduced to \<25 mm Hg * history of NIPU only or iritis only with no vitritis, macular edema, vitreous cells, or vitreous haze * infectious etiology, vitreous hemorrhage, or a toxoplasma scar in the study eye * ocular surgery and/or trauma on the study eye within 3 months prior to enrollment, or trabeculoplasty or yttrium aluminum garnet laser within 1 month prior to study enrollment * monocularity * AIDS * pregnancy/lactation * potential for noncompliance * or participation in other clinical studies within 1 month of enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to first occurrence of uveitis in the study eye.2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of recurrences33 months
Number of recurrences compared to the 52 weeks prior to enrollment33 months
Change in quality of life indices33 months
The proportion of subjects with a visual acuity improvement of more than 15 letters on ETDRS charts from baseline.33 months
Change in the size, if present at baseline, of the area of CME on fluorescein angiography33 months
Analysis of safety variables33 months
Percent of subjects who had at least one recurrence33 months
Adjunctive treatment required33 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026