Skip to content

Comparison Trial of Enema vs. PEG 3350 for Constipation

Randomized Clinical Trial of Milk and Molasses Enema vs. PEG 3350 for Fecal Impaction in Childhood Constipation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00467350
Enrollment
80
Registered
2007-04-30
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2020-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Keywords

constipation, treatment, fecal impaction, pediatric

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if milk and molasses enema or PEG 3350 works better for treatment of fecal impaction in children who are constipated.

Detailed description

Constipation is a common condition in childhood and occurs without evidence of a pathological condition in most children. Symptoms range from decreased appetite to abdominal pain and constipation is frequently diagnosed in children evaluated in emergency departments. A general guideline for constipation treatment is fecal impaction removal before initiation of maintenance therapy. Disimpaction may be achieved using various oral therapies (e.g. including Polyethylene Glycol 3350 or PEG); however, rectal therapies, most commonly enemas, are frequently used, especially in the emergency/urgent care setting. The optimal treatment has not been established. There are no published randomized studies that compare effectiveness of oral versus rectal treatments. Comparison: One milk and molasses enema given to the patient in the emergency department compared to three oral doses of PEG 3350 for relief of symptoms due to fecal impaction and constipation.

Interventions

PEG 3350 1.5 gram/kg for disimpaction then 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance

DRUGmilk and molasses enema

enema 10 cc/kg per rectum (max 500 cc)then PEG 3350 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance

Sponsors

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Constipated children who have one of the following three conditions: * Fecal impaction (lower quadrant mass or dilated rectum with hard stool), * Functional fecal retention (large diameter stools as determined by caregiver \<twice/week and retentive behaviors, or * Excessive stool in colon on abdominal radiograph as determined by attending radiologist or treating physician

Exclusion criteria

* Ill appearing patients (signs of acute surgical abdomen, abnormal vital signs, or overall ill appearing as determined by treating physician) * Patients whose evaluation in the ED includes more than plain radiographs or urinalysis * Patients who receive analgesia for the abdominal pain in the ED (except acetaminophen or ibuprofen) * Non-English speaking patients and families * Patients with milk allergy * Patients with molasses allergy * Patients who are pregnant * Patients with a chronic medical conditions which may be associated with constipation (including patients with cystic fibrosis, cerebral palsy, hypothyroidism, spinal anomalies, and known gastrointestinal anatomic abnormalities) or a history of prior abdominal or rectal surgery * Patients who are admitted to an in-patient unit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Participants With Main Symptom Improvement5 daysOn day 5, the number of participants who respond improved to the question Has your child's main symptom improved, stayed the same or gotten worse?

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A convenience sample of patients aged 1 to 17 years was recruited between December 2006 and May 2009 from a pediatric emergency department.

Pre-assignment details

There were no significant events that occurred after enrollment and before study arm assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enema
Rectal enema containing mixture of milk and molasses milk and molasses enema: enema 10 cc/kg per rectum (max 500 cc)then PEG 3350 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance
40
PEG 3350
Medication to be taken orally once each day for three consecutive days PEG 3350: PEG 3350 1.5 gram/kg for disimpaction then 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance
39
Total79

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnemaPEG 3350Total
Age, Continuous6.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
6.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
6.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
17 Participants14 Participants31 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
other
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
12 Participants18 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 Participants39 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants20 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants19 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 404 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Participants With Main Symptom Improvement

On day 5, the number of participants who respond improved to the question Has your child's main symptom improved, stayed the same or gotten worse?

Time frame: 5 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnemaThe Number of Participants With Main Symptom Improvement28 Participants
PEG 3350The Number of Participants With Main Symptom Improvement22 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026