Skip to content

Effect of Diabetic Medications on Bone Metabolism

Effect of Thiazolidinediones on Skeletal Health

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00467285
Enrollment
96
Registered
2007-04-30
Start date
2006-10-01
Completion date
2009-09-01
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Bone Density, C-telopeptide, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, N-telopeptide, Osteocalcin, Osteoporosis, Thiazolidinediones, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Subjects with diabetes and pre-diabetes are said to have increased bone loss when compared to the general population. Pioglitazone a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Though there are many benefits for using thiazolidinediones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, there is data that indicates that rosiglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density in mice. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. If the animal data can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinediones may pose a significant risk of adverse effects on bone. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of this are: 1. to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health; 2. to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers, at different times of persons taking thiazolidinediones and others not taking them; 3. to determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within different groups at different times; and 4. to compare these changes.

Detailed description

The prevalence rate of diabetes among veterans is 16% in general and 27% at out medical center compared to 6.3% among United States population. Subjects with diabetes and prediabetes said to have increased bone loss compared to the general population. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Most of the pleiotropic effects of teh thiazolidinediones are beneficial in atherosclerosis and cancer, in addition to improving insulin resistance. Data from studies in mice show that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density was observed. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. There are no prospective studies to date. Subjects with diabetes are already at an increased risk for femoral fractures. If the animal data can be can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant risk of adverse skeletal effects. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in a significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of the study include: 1. To prospectively evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health, we will study 140 subjects with diabetes receiving pioglitazone as part of their diabetes management and compare them with 140 diabetic controls (matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol history), not treated with pioglitazone. 2. To measure the bone mineral density by DXA at AP spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers-procollagen type 1C-terminal propeptide (P1CP), and procollagen type 1N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), bone specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, plasma C-telopeptide (CTx) and N-telopeptide (NTx) at baseline, six and 12 months of follow-up. 3. To determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within each group from baseline to follow-up at six and 12 months. 4. To compare the changes in the BMD and bone turnover markers between groups at baseline and follow-up at six and 12 months. Subjects: Prospectively study 140 subjects with type 2 diabetes and on pioglitazone, age, and sex matched controls. Sample Size: The sample size is based on the primary objective of comparing the levels bone turnover markers and bone mineral density changes in diabetes with or without avandia. Number of visits: 140 subjects with diabetes and on pioglitazone and 140 subjects with diabetes not on pioglitazone 1. Subjects will be studies at three visits. 2. The procedures to be done include assessment of bone mineral density measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), measurement of bone turnover markers like serum osteocalcin and urinary N-telopeptide after the informed consent. About 15ml (one tablespoonful) of blood will be drawn at each visit for the study. 3. All the baseline measurements will be repeated at 6 months and at one year. 4. Statistical analysis of the data will be done to compare the changes in bone turnover markers and bone mineral density between the two groups. Site of the study: Overton Brooks VAMC Diabetics clinic and Primary care clinics. If our hypothesis is proven correct, subjects with diabetes requiring thiazolidinediones should have bone turnover markers and BMD measurement at baseline and have serial follow up. Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary protective measures to protect the bone to decrease the fracture risk. Potential Impact on Veterans Health Care: Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary preventive measures to protect the bone and decrease the risk of fractures, or avoid the use of TZDs altogether in select patients. Since the prevalence of diabetes is very high among veterans, evaluation of a possible risk of skeletal health with the use of pioglitazone is highly relevant to VA health care.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 30-55 years * Gender: men and women * Ethnicity: all ethnic groups * 140 subjects with diabetes and no pioglitazone (recently started i.e. less than 3 months as well as those who have just initiated pioglitazone treatment) * 140 control subjects (subjects with diabetes and not on pioglitazone) will be included * The control subjects will be chosen to match age, sex, ethnicity and comparable smoking and alcohol history * To avoid confusion factor of vitamin D and calcium intake, all the subjects will be given vitamin D and calcium supplements (USDA recommended doses)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unable or unwilling yo give informed consent * Immobilized or bed bound subject * Subjects wil known diseases associated with disordered bone metabolism such as chronic renal insufficiency, chronic steroid use, primary hyperparathyroidism, untreated subclinical or clinical hyperthyroidism and Paget's disease. To identify subjects with decreased Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) even if creatinine is normal will be excluded (at the proposed study site, routine bm includes calculated GFR from the chemistry lab) * Patients on medications that will alter bone metabolism will be excluded. They are glucocorticoids, gonadal hormones (testosterone in men and estrogen in women). * Subjects with known history of chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy or malabsorption syndromes to avoid confounding factors known to affect vitamin D metabolism and indirectly bone mineral metabolism. * Female patients with perimenopause or menopause: history of hypogonadism (History of ovariectomy or postmenopausal women) to avoid bone turn over changes secondary to hypogonadism. Perimenopausal women identifies by screening FSH and LH and excluding women with elevated FSH be excluded to avoid perimenopausal effect on bone turnover (women over 35 will still have a screening gonadal hormonal evaluation).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck6 months% changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone
Changes in BMD Total Hip6 months% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Changes in BMD AP Spine6 months% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius6 months% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CTx6 months% Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Osteocalcin6 months% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Changes in CTx at Follow up6 months% change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSubhashini Yaturu, MD

Albany VA Medical Center Samuel S. Stratton, Albany, NY

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Endo-Research clinic

Pre-assignment details

Young male veterans with type 2 diabetes with creatinine less than 1.4, aged less than 55 years

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pioglitazone
32 subjects with type 2 diabetes on pioglitazone.
32
No Pioglitazone
64 subjects with type 2 diabetes not on pioglitazone, less than 55 years old.
64
Total96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo PioglitazonePioglitazoneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants32 Participants96 Participants
Age, Continuous49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Ctx19 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
29 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
22 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants32 Participants96 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius

% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneChanges in BMD 0.33 Radius-3.8 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.22
No PioglitazoneChanges in BMD 0.33 Radius-0.21 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.4
Primary

Changes in BMD AP Spine

% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneChanges in BMD AP Spine-0.1 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.04
No PioglitazoneChanges in BMD AP Spine0.89 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.1
Primary

Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck

% changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 28 subjects on pioglitazone and 64 subjects not on pioglitazone

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneChanges in BMD at Femoral Neck-3.2 percentage of change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.25
No PioglitazoneChanges in BMD at Femoral Neck0.25 percentage of change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.24
Comparison: comparison of changes in BMD at 6months compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Changes in BMD Total Hip

% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneChanges in BMD Total Hip-3.5 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.24
No PioglitazoneChanges in BMD Total Hip-0.2 % change in BMDStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Changes in CTx at Follow up

% change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneChanges in CTx at Follow up29 % changeStandard Deviation 2
No PioglitazoneChanges in CTx at Follow up19 % changeStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

CTx

% Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneCTx4.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.1
No PioglitazoneCTx4.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Osteocalcin

% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PiogliazoneOsteocalcin-20.49 % changeStandard Deviation 2.5
No PioglitazoneOsteocalcin-12.44 % changeStandard Deviation 2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026