Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Methods of Laparoscopy Port Closure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00466648
Enrollment
20
Registered
2007-04-27
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2007-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Cosmesis

Keywords

laparoscopy, port site, closure, Dermabond

Brief summary

This study wishes to compare patient satisfaction and cosmesis of two different closure methods of laparoscopic ports. One method uses tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with a deep sub-cutaneous stitch and a Band-Aid dressing. The comparison method uses a 3.o undyed vicryl transcutaneous stitch, with a Bacitracin and Tegaderm dressing.

Interventions

Sponsors

New York Presbyterian Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* gynecologic laparoscopy patients

Exclusion criteria

* known sensitivity to tissue adhesive, antibiotic ointment

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026