Skip to content

An Open-Label Study to Compare the Lipid Effects of Niacin ER and Simvastatin (NS) to Atorvastatin in Subjects With Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia (SUPREME)

SUPREME: A 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Compare the Lipid Effects of Niacin ER and Simvastatin (NS) to Atorvastatin in Subjects With Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00465088
Acronym
SUPREME
Enrollment
199
Registered
2007-04-24
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia

Brief summary

To demonstrate that niacin ER and simvastatin (NS) tablets, when compared to atorvastatin (Lipitor®; Pfizer, Inc.), has superior high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) elevating effects at Week 12 in subjects with type II hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia who are currently off lipid-modifying therapy. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study.

Interventions

DRUGNiacin ER/Simvastatin Tablets

Up to 2000 mg/40 mg at bedtime

DRUGatorvastatin

40 mg at bedtime

Sponsors

Abbott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must meet all of the following laboratory criteria: * HDL-C \<40 mg/dL for men and \<50 mg/dL for women. * LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL but \<250 mg/dL. * TG \<350 mg/dL. * Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) \< 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\] and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\] \< 1.3 x ULN. * Subjects must also be reasonably compliant with the Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes (TLC) diet during the 4 to 5 week Screening Period prior to randomization (and be willing to comply for the duration of the study).

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have a history of any important medical conditions or abnormalities (as specified in the protocol) that would preclude study inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8From baseline to Week 8(Week 8 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C
Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8From baseline to Week 8(Week 8 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C
Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C
Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C) x 100/baseline LDL-C
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides) x 100/baseline triglycerides
Percent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C RatioFrom baseline to Week 12(Week 12 LDL-C:HDL-C ratio minus baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio
Percentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 1212 weeks
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C RatioFrom baseline to Week 12(Week 12 total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio minus baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio
Percent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 lipoprotein A minus baseline lipoprotein A) x 100/baseline lipoprotein A
Percentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 1212 weeksFor high-risk patients (coronary heart disease or equivalent), LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 130 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients (having 2 risk factors), LDL-C \< 130 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 160 mg/dL; for low-risk patients (having 0 or 1 risk factor): LDL-C \< 160 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 190 mg/dL.
Percentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1212 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1212 weeksNCEP ATP III goals for LDL-C are as follows: For high-risk patients, LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients, LDL-C \< 130 mg/dL; for low-risk patients: LDL-C \< 160 mg/dL. High-risk means coronary heart disease or risk equivalents; moderate risk means having at least 2 risk factors; low-risk means having no or 1 risk factor.
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12From baseline to Week 12(Week 12 total cholesterol minus baseline total cholesterol) x 100/baseline total cholesterol

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 199 subjects randomized, 6 did not receive study drug: 2 withdrew consent, 1 had a protocol violation, and 3 had randomization errors. 193 subjects were treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin
Up to 2000 mg of niacin extended-release plus 40 mg simvastatin once daily at bedtime
114
Atorvastatin
40 mg atorvastatin once daily at bedtime
79
Total193

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtorvastatinNiacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants21 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
73 Participants93 Participants166 Participants
Age Continuous51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.12
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Region of Enrollment
United States
79 participants114 participants193 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants71 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants43 Participants84 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
89 / —27 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / —1 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 1230.1 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 129.4 percent change
Comparison: An n = 81 for niacin extended-release with simvastatin and n = 54 for atorvastatin would provide \> 99% power to detect a 13% increase in HDL-C with niacin extended-release with simvastatin relative to atorvastatin, assuming an SD of 16%p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 12

For high-risk patients (coronary heart disease or equivalent), LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 130 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients (having 2 risk factors), LDL-C \< 130 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 160 mg/dL; for low-risk patients (having 0 or 1 risk factor): LDL-C \< 160 mg/dL and non-HDL-C \< 190 mg/dL.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All treated subjects not meeting NCEP ATP III goals at baseline with both a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline LDL-C value

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 1278 Percentage of subjects
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 1284 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All treated subjects not meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III goals at baseline with both a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline HDL-C value

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 1278 Percentage of subjects
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 1228 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12

NCEP ATP III goals for LDL-C are as follows: For high-risk patients, LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients, LDL-C \< 130 mg/dL; for low-risk patients: LDL-C \< 160 mg/dL. High-risk means coronary heart disease or risk equivalents; moderate risk means having at least 2 risk factors; low-risk means having no or 1 risk factor.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All treated subjects not meeting NCEP ATP III goals at baseline with both a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline value for all 3 lipid parameters

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1265 Percentage of subjects
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1234 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All treated subjects not meeting NCEP ATP III goals at baseline with both a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline triglyceride value

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1279 Percentage of subjects
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 1270 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8

(Week 8 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C

Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 8 value was obtained within the Week 8 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 826.7 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 81.4 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C Ratio

(Week 12 LDL-C:HDL-C ratio minus baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 values were obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C Ratio-54.5 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C Ratio-50.5 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 lipoprotein A minus baseline lipoprotein A) x 100/baseline lipoprotein A

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 12-15.8 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 1216.0 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C) x 100/baseline LDL-C

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window (between 70 days after first dose and not more than 3 days after last dose)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12-43.8 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12-46.0 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12-43.4 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12-43.3 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8

(Week 8 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C

Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 8 value was obtained within the Week 8 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8-45.0 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8-44.3 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 total cholesterol minus baseline total cholesterol) x 100/baseline total cholesterol

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-31.3 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-35.1 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C Ratio

(Week 12 total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio minus baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 values were obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C Ratio-45.2 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C Ratio-40.3 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides) x 100/baseline triglycerides

Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Population: All treated subjects whose Week 12 value was obtained within the Week 12 visit window

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Niacin Extended-release Plus SimvastatinPercent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12-44.0 percent change
AtorvastatinPercent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12-37.0 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026