Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment in Combination With Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00464685
Enrollment
253
Registered
2007-04-24
Start date
2007-05-01
Completion date
2010-02-08
Last updated
2019-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal implant of dexamethasone with laser treatment vs. laser treatment alone in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.

DRUGSham injection

Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.

PROCEDURELaser Photocoagulation

Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older with diabetic macular edema * Decrease in visual acuity in at least one eye as a result of macular edema (20/50 or worse) * Visual acuity in other eye no worse than 20/200

Exclusion criteria

* Known anticipated need for ocular surgery within next 12 months * History of glaucoma or current high eye pressure requiring more than 1 medication * Uncontrolled systemic disease * Known steroid-responder * Use of systemic steroids - Use of Warfarin/Heparin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 12BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 12BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye12 MonthsTime to retreatment in the study eye is defined as the number of days between the initial treatment and re-treatment with the study medication.
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Central subfield retinal thickness is assessed in the study eye by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The central subfield is an area in the retina (back of the eye). OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Focal leakage area in the study eye is assessed using fluorescein angiography. A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation
Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
126
Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation
Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
127
Total253

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationSham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationTotal
Age, Customized
45 to 65 years
72 Participants84 Participants156 Participants
Age, Customized
<45 years
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
47 Participants40 Participants87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants61 Participants125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants66 Participants128 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
125 / 125127 / 127
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 12527 / 127

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye27.8 Percentage of Patients
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye23.6 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline57.6 Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 9.38
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 122.9 Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 11.45
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline57.8 Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 9.66
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 122.1 Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 12.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye

Central subfield retinal thickness is assessed in the study eye by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The central subfield is an area in the retina (back of the eye). OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline438.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 133.93
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 12-102.8 MicronsStandard Deviation 130.86
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline430.3 MicronsStandard Deviation 131.15
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 12-125.3 MicronsStandard Deviation 123.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye

Focal leakage area in the study eye is assessed using fluorescein angiography. A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study EyeBaseline0.6 Millimeters Squared (mm^2)Standard Deviation 1.46
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 12-0.2 Millimeters Squared (mm^2)Standard Deviation 0.96
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study EyeBaseline1.1 Millimeters Squared (mm^2)Standard Deviation 2.64
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 12-0.7 Millimeters Squared (mm^2)Standard Deviation 3.07
Secondary

Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye

Time to retreatment in the study eye is defined as the number of days between the initial treatment and re-treatment with the study medication.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationTime to Retreatment in the Study Eye189 Days
Sham Implant and Laser PhotocoagulationTime to Retreatment in the Study Eye196 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026