Diabetic Macular Edema
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal implant of dexamethasone with laser treatment vs. laser treatment alone in patients with diabetic macular edema.
Interventions
Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.
Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.
Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older with diabetic macular edema * Decrease in visual acuity in at least one eye as a result of macular edema (20/50 or worse) * Visual acuity in other eye no worse than 20/200
Exclusion criteria
* Known anticipated need for ocular surgery within next 12 months * History of glaucoma or current high eye pressure requiring more than 1 medication * Uncontrolled systemic disease * Known steroid-responder * Use of systemic steroids - Use of Warfarin/Heparin
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye | Baseline, Month 12 | BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye | Baseline, Month 12 | BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening. |
| Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye | 12 Months | Time to retreatment in the study eye is defined as the number of days between the initial treatment and re-treatment with the study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye | Baseline, Month 12 | Central subfield retinal thickness is assessed in the study eye by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The central subfield is an area in the retina (back of the eye). OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening. |
| Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye | Baseline, Month 12 | Focal leakage area in the study eye is assessed using fluorescein angiography. A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria. | 126 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria. | 127 |
| Total | 253 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 45 to 65 years | 72 Participants | 84 Participants | 156 Participants |
| Age, Customized <45 years | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age, Customized >65 years | 47 Participants | 40 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 64 Participants | 61 Participants | 125 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 62 Participants | 66 Participants | 128 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 125 / 125 | 127 / 127 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 23 / 125 | 27 / 127 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye | 27.8 Percentage of Patients |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye | 23.6 Percentage of Patients |
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye | Baseline | 57.6 Letters Read Correctly | Standard Deviation 9.38 |
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 2.9 Letters Read Correctly | Standard Deviation 11.45 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye | Baseline | 57.8 Letters Read Correctly | Standard Deviation 9.66 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 2.1 Letters Read Correctly | Standard Deviation 12.05 |
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye
Central subfield retinal thickness is assessed in the study eye by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The central subfield is an area in the retina (back of the eye). OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye | Baseline | 438.4 Microns | Standard Deviation 133.93 |
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | -102.8 Microns | Standard Deviation 130.86 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye | Baseline | 430.3 Microns | Standard Deviation 131.15 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | -125.3 Microns | Standard Deviation 123.38 |
Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye
Focal leakage area in the study eye is assessed using fluorescein angiography. A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye | Baseline | 0.6 Millimeters Squared (mm^2) | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | -0.2 Millimeters Squared (mm^2) | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye | Baseline | 1.1 Millimeters Squared (mm^2) | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline at Month 12 | -0.7 Millimeters Squared (mm^2) | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye
Time to retreatment in the study eye is defined as the number of days between the initial treatment and re-treatment with the study medication.
Time frame: 12 Months
Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye | 189 Days |
| Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation | Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye | 196 Days |