Skip to content

Protocol Memory Deficit in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Comparison of the Evolution of Memory Deficit in Patients With Sleep Apnea Obstructive Syndrome (SAOS) Before and After Effective Versus Sham Treatment by Positive Pression Continues (PPC)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00464659
Enrollment
40
Registered
2007-04-23
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2015-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Memory Deficit

Keywords

Sleep apnea obstructive syndrome (SAOS), memory deficit, Continuous Positive Airway Pression (CPAP), Sham CPAP

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the evolution of memory deficit (verbal episodic memory, procedural memory, working memory, short-term memory) in Sleep Apnea Obstructive Syndrome (SAOS) patients after treatment by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment (CPAP). For thus, we will compare memory tests in two separate groups of SAOS patients with effective versus ineffective ( or sham) CPAP, before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment. Thus we will assess the evolution of memory deficit, the effectiveness of the treatment on the evolution of memory deficit before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment by effective versus ineffective CPAP. We feel the results of the tests of memory will show greater memory disorders in patients with SAOS before beginning the treatment rather than six weeks afterwards. Thus we hypothesise that, after the treatment by effective CPAP, the patients with SAOS will have greater improvement of their memory disorders than those treated by sham CPAP.

Detailed description

We want to assess the evolution, before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment, of the significant differences of the performances of the various memory tests evaluating several forms of memory (episodic memory, working memory, short-term memory and procedural memory) according to the treatment for patients with SAOS (effective versus sham).

Interventions

Auto-titrating CPAP machines (Remstar Auto; Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA) provided by a home care company (Bastide Medical, France). Pressure was set between 6 and 14 cm of water

DEVICESham CPAP

Similar CPAP machine delivering a 4 cm of water pressure that was too low to suppress sleep respiratory events.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major patients, * agreeing, * diagnosed suffering from the SAOS, * regulation by the specialist in a treatment by CPAP, * patients do not begin the treatment * affiliated to the social security, * fluent in French.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients presenting severe depressive disorders (HADS score\>19), * intellectual deterioration (MMS\< 28), * a functional failure of the dominant arm upper limb inhibiting realization of graphic tasks, * an associated oxygen treatment, * suffering from cancer, * cerebro-vascular accident, * pregnant or nursing women, * adult under supervision or trusteeship, * patients already included in another research protocol or in period of exclusion, * antidepressant and anxiolytic treatment.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026