Skip to content

A Multicenter Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Subjects With Dyslipidemia

A 12-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Combination of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Compared to ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Monotherapy in Subjects With Type IIa and IIb Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00463606
Enrollment
760
Registered
2007-04-20
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2012-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium combination therapy to monotherapy in subjects with dyslipidemia.

Detailed description

There are 3 treatment groups in the study: ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg, ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, and rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy. The 3 primary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in HDL-C and TG comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and mean percent change in LDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy. The 6 secondary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in Non-HDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, mean percent change in Non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, ApoB, and Total Cholesterol comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and median percent change in hsCRP comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy).

Interventions

ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks

ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks

Rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male and female participants who voluntarily sign the informed consent. * Fasting lipid results following greater than 12-hour fasting period: * Triglycerides level greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL, * High-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than 40 mg/dL for males and less than 50 mg/dL for females, and * Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol greater than or equal to 130 mg/dL. * Participant must agree to utilize adequate birth control methods and adhere to the American Heart Association (AHA) diet.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with unstable medical conditions, medical conditions considered inappropriate in a clinical trial, or participants who are taking excluded concomitant medications are not allowed in the study. * Participants receiving coumarin anticoagulants or systemic cyclosporine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in triglycerides, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in apolipoprotein B (ApoB), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in total cholesterol, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Median Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe median percent change from baseline to the final visit in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

760 participants were randomized at 144 sites in the United States, and 758 participants were treated between 07 June 2007 and 10 February 2008. Two participants were randomized but not treated: 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 was withdrawn at the investigator's discretion.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 168 study sites screened participants, wtih 144 of these sites randomizing participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium
ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
253
ABT-335
ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
254
Rosuvastatin Calcium
Rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
251
Total758

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event211811
Overall StudyCoordinator error100
Overall StudyExclusion criteria violation200
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up223
Overall StudyParticipation in another ABT-335 trial100
Overall StudyPatient randomized in error100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudySponsor request010
Overall StudySubject moved out of town100
Overall StudySubject noncompliance110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11115

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicABT-335Rosuvastatin CalciumABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
51 Participants46 Participants59 Participants156 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
203 Participants205 Participants194 Participants602 Participants
Age Continuous54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.71
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
254 participants251 participants253 participants758 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
144 Participants150 Participants161 Participants455 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
110 Participants101 Participants92 Participants303 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 25341 / 25445 / 251
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 2536 / 2544 / 251

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)23.0 percent changeStandard Error 1.33
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)12.4 percent changeStandard Error 1.32
Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)-28.7 percent changeStandard Error 1.33
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)-4.1 percent changeStandard Error 1.31
Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in triglycerides, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for triglycerides. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)-40.3 percent changeStandard Error 1.89
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)-17.5 percent changeStandard Error 1.88
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in apolipoprotein B (ApoB), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for ApoB. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)-30.9 percent changeStandard Error 1
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)-26.4 percent changeStandard Error 0.99
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for non-HDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)-37.4 percent changeStandard Error 1.06
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)-16.0 percent changeStandard Error 1.05
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for non-HDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)-37.4 percent changeStandard Error 1.06
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)-31.8 percent changeStandard Error 1.05
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in total cholesterol, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for total cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)-28.1 percent changeStandard Error 0.85
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)-25.0 percent changeStandard Error 0.84
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for VLDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)-41.3 percent changeStandard Error 3.56
Rosuvastatin CalciumMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)-22.2 percent changeStandard Error 3.53
Secondary

Median Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)

The median percent change from baseline to the final visit in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for hsCRP. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin CalciumMedian Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)-28.0 percent change
Rosuvastatin CalciumMedian Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)-11.4 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026